Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HAND 1/2015

01-03-2015

Composite grafting for pediatric fingertip injuries

Authors: Kyle R. Eberlin, Kathleen Busa, Donald S. Bae, Peter M. Waters, Brian I. Labow, Amir H. Taghinia

Published in: HAND | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fingertip injuries are common in the pediatric population. Composite grafting is a frequently used technique for distal amputations in children given the reported success rate. We sought to study the early clinical results of composite grafting for fingertip injuries in the pediatric population.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed over a 5-year period at a tertiary care pediatric hospital to identify those patients who underwent composite grafting of fingertip injuries. Patients were included if they were 18 years old or younger and sustained an injury distal to the distal interphalangeal joint (or thumb interphalangeal joint). Demographic information was recorded. Graft viability was characterized as no take, partial take, or complete take. The number of secondary procedures and number and duration of follow-up appointments were recorded. Hypothesis testing was done using ordinal logistic regression analysis.

Results

Thirty-nine patients underwent fingertip composite grafting. The mean age was 5.9 years (1–18 years); there were 24 males (61.5 %) and 15 females (38.5 %). Thirteen patients had no graft take (33.3 %), 23 patients had partial take (59.0 %), and three patients had complete take (7.7 %). Only four patients underwent secondary revision (10 %). The median number of follow-up appointments was 3 and the average follow-up time was 4.5 months. Age did not appear to have a statistically significant influence on graft take.

Conclusions

Fingertip composite grafts rarely take completely even in young children. Despite poor viability, however, most patients will have at least partial graft take and do not undergo additional reconstructive procedures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aden KK, Biel MA. The evaluation of pharmacologic agents on composite graft survival. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:175–8.CrossRefPubMed Aden KK, Biel MA. The evaluation of pharmacologic agents on composite graft survival. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:175–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brent B. Replantation of amputated distal phalangeal parts of fingers without vascular anastomoses, using subcutaneous pockets. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Brent B. Replantation of amputated distal phalangeal parts of fingers without vascular anastomoses, using subcutaneous pockets. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Douglas B. Successful replacement of completely avulsed portions of fingers as composite grafts. Plas Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1959;23:213–25.CrossRef Douglas B. Successful replacement of completely avulsed portions of fingers as composite grafts. Plas Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1959;23:213–25.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Elsahy NI. When to replant a fingertip after its complete amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60:11–21.CrossRef Elsahy NI. When to replant a fingertip after its complete amputation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60:11–21.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fassler PR. Fingertip injuries: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996;4:84–92.PubMed Fassler PR. Fingertip injuries: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1996;4:84–92.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Fetter-Zarzeka A, Joseph MM. Hand and fingertip injuries in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002;18:341–5.CrossRefPubMed Fetter-Zarzeka A, Joseph MM. Hand and fingertip injuries in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2002;18:341–5.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Foucher G, Citron N. Therapeutic approach in fingertip injuries. Skin cover in the injured hand. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. 182. Foucher G, Citron N. Therapeutic approach in fingertip injuries. Skin cover in the injured hand. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1992. 182.
8.
go back to reference Gellman H. Fingertip-nail bed injuries in children: current concepts and controversies of treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:1033–5.CrossRefPubMed Gellman H. Fingertip-nail bed injuries in children: current concepts and controversies of treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20:1033–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hartman DF, Goode RL. Pharmacologic enhancement of composite graft survival. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113:720–3.CrossRefPubMed Hartman DF, Goode RL. Pharmacologic enhancement of composite graft survival. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113:720–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, et al. A retrospective study of functional outcomes after successful replantation versus amputation closure for single fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg. 2006;31:811–8.CrossRef Hattori Y, Doi K, Ikeda K, et al. A retrospective study of functional outcomes after successful replantation versus amputation closure for single fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg. 2006;31:811–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Heistein JB, Cook PA. Factors affecting composite graft survival in digital tip amputations. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:299–303.CrossRefPubMed Heistein JB, Cook PA. Factors affecting composite graft survival in digital tip amputations. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50:299–303.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hirase Y. Postoperative cooling enhances composite graft survival in nasal-alar and fingertip reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:707–11.CrossRefPubMed Hirase Y. Postoperative cooling enhances composite graft survival in nasal-alar and fingertip reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;46:707–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hong JP, Lee SJ, Lee HB, et al. Reconstruction of fingertip and stump using a composite graft from the hypothenar region. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:57–62.CrossRefPubMed Hong JP, Lee SJ, Lee HB, et al. Reconstruction of fingertip and stump using a composite graft from the hypothenar region. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;51:57–62.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lee PK, Ahn ST, Lim P. Replantation of fingertip amputation by using the pocket principle in adults. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1428–35.CrossRefPubMed Lee PK, Ahn ST, Lim P. Replantation of fingertip amputation by using the pocket principle in adults. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1428–35.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lemmon JA, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ. Soft-tissue injuries of the fingertip: methods of evaluation and treatment. An algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:105e–17.CrossRefPubMed Lemmon JA, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ. Soft-tissue injuries of the fingertip: methods of evaluation and treatment. An algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:105e–17.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Li EN, Menon NG, Rodriguez ED, et al. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on composite graft survival. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:141–5.CrossRefPubMed Li EN, Menon NG, Rodriguez ED, et al. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on composite graft survival. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;53:141–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Martin, C., Gonzalez del Pino, J. Controversies in the treatment of fingertip amputations. Conservative versus surgical reconstruction. Clinical orthopaedics and related research: 63–73, 1998. Martin, C., Gonzalez del Pino, J. Controversies in the treatment of fingertip amputations. Conservative versus surgical reconstruction. Clinical orthopaedics and related research: 63–73, 1998.
19.
go back to reference Moiemen NS, Elliot D. Composite graft replacement of digital tips. 2. A study in children. J Hand Surg (Br). 1997;22:346–52.CrossRef Moiemen NS, Elliot D. Composite graft replacement of digital tips. 2. A study in children. J Hand Surg (Br). 1997;22:346–52.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Murai M, Lau HK, Pereira BP, et al. A cadaver study on volume and surface area of the fingertip. J Hand Surg. 1997;22:935–41.CrossRef Murai M, Lau HK, Pereira BP, et al. A cadaver study on volume and surface area of the fingertip. J Hand Surg. 1997;22:935–41.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Rose EH, Norris MS, Kowalski TA, et al. The “cap” technique: nonmicrosurgical reattachment of fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg. 1989;14:513–8.CrossRef Rose EH, Norris MS, Kowalski TA, et al. The “cap” technique: nonmicrosurgical reattachment of fingertip amputations. J Hand Surg. 1989;14:513–8.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Son D, Han K, Chang DW. Extending the limits of fingertip composite grafting with moist-exposed dressing. Int Wound J. 2005;2:315–21.CrossRefPubMed Son D, Han K, Chang DW. Extending the limits of fingertip composite grafting with moist-exposed dressing. Int Wound J. 2005;2:315–21.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Yeo CJ, Sebastin SJ, Chong AK. Fingertip injuries. Singap Med J. 2010;51:78–86. quiz 87. Yeo CJ, Sebastin SJ, Chong AK. Fingertip injuries. Singap Med J. 2010;51:78–86. quiz 87.
Metadata
Title
Composite grafting for pediatric fingertip injuries
Authors
Kyle R. Eberlin
Kathleen Busa
Donald S. Bae
Peter M. Waters
Brian I. Labow
Amir H. Taghinia
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
HAND / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1558-9447
Electronic ISSN: 1558-9455
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9671-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

HAND 1/2015 Go to the issue