Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Article

Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of cervical disc replacement and fusion hybrid surgery with various geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc

Authors: Yang Li, Guy R. Fogel, Zhenhua Liao, Weiqiang Liu

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Few finite element studies have investigated changes in cervical biomechanics with various prosthesis design parameters using hybrid surgery (HS), and none have investigated those combined different HS strategies. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of ball-and-socket prosthesis geometry on the biomechanical performance of the cervical spine combined with two HS constructs.

Methods

Two HS strategies were conducted: (1) ACDF at C4–C5 and anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) at C5–C6 (ACDF/ACDR), and (2) ACDR/ACDF. Three different prostheses were used for each HS strategy: prosthesis with the core located at the center of the inferior endplate with a radius of 5 mm (BS-5) or 6 mm (BS-6), or with a 5 mm radius core located 1 mm posterior to the center of the inferior endplate (PBS-5). Flexion and extension motions were simulated under displacement control.

Results

The flexion motions in supra- and infra-adjacent levels increased in all cases. The corresponding extension motions increased with all prostheses in ACDR/ACDF group. The stiffness in flexion and extension increased with all HS models, except for the extension stiffness with ACDF/ACDR. The facet stresses between the index and infra-adjacent level in ACDR/ACDF were significantly greater than those in the intact model . The stresses on the BS-5 UHMWPE core were greater than the yield stress.

Conclusion

The core radii and position did not significantly affect the moments, ROM, and facet stress in extension. However, the moments and ROM in flexion were easily affected by the position. The results implied that the large core radii and posterior core position in ACDR designs may reduce the risk of subsidence and wear in the long term as they showed relative low stress . The ACDF/ACDR surgery at C4–C6 level may be an optimal treatment for avoiding accelerating the degeneration of adjacent segments.
Literature
4.
go back to reference McDonald CP, Chang V, McDonald M, Ramo N, Bey MJ, Bartol S (2014) Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 20:245–255. doi:10.3171/2013.11.SPINE13392 CrossRefPubMed McDonald CP, Chang V, McDonald M, Ramo N, Bey MJ, Bartol S (2014) Three-dimensional motion analysis of the cervical spine for comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus artificial disc replacement in 17 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 20:245–255. doi:10.​3171/​2013.​11.​SPINE13392 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Artificial disc versus fusion a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 32:2933–2940CrossRefPubMed Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG (2007) Artificial disc versus fusion a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 32:2933–2940CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Liu B, Zeng Z, Van Hoof T, Kalala JP, Liu Z, Wu B (2015) Comparison of hybrid constructs with 2-level artificial disc replacement and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for surgical reconstruction of the cervical spine: a kinematic study in whole cadavers. Med Sci Monit 21:1031–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu B, Zeng Z, Van Hoof T, Kalala JP, Liu Z, Wu B (2015) Comparison of hybrid constructs with 2-level artificial disc replacement and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for surgical reconstruction of the cervical spine: a kinematic study in whole cadavers. Med Sci Monit 21:1031–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
15.
go back to reference Rousseau M, Bonnet X, Skalli W (2008) Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine–a finite element study. Spine 33:E10–E14CrossRefPubMed Rousseau M, Bonnet X, Skalli W (2008) Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine–a finite element study. Spine 33:E10–E14CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Faizan A, Goel VK, Garfin SR, Bono CM, Serhan H, Biyani A, Elgafy H, Krishna M, Friesem T (2012) Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 5):S653–S662. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1211-6 CrossRefPubMed Faizan A, Goel VK, Garfin SR, Bono CM, Serhan H, Biyani A, Elgafy H, Krishna M, Friesem T (2012) Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation. Eur Spine J 21(Suppl 5):S653–S662. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-009-1211-6 CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Mo Z, Zhao Y, Du C, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan Y (2015) Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics? Spine 40:E469–E475CrossRefPubMed Mo Z, Zhao Y, Du C, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan Y (2015) Does location of rotation center in artificial disc affect cervical biomechanics? Spine 40:E469–E475CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mo Z, Li Q, Jia Z, Yang J, Wong DW, Fan Y (2016) Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 26:1181–1190. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4777-9 Mo Z, Li Q, Jia Z, Yang J, Wong DW, Fan Y (2016) Biomechanical consideration of prosthesis selection in hybrid surgery for bi-level cervical disc degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J 26:1181–1190. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-016-4777-9
22.
go back to reference Ganbat D, Kim YH, Kim K, Jin YJ, Park WM (2016) Effect of mechanical loading on heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15:1191–1199. doi:10.1007/s10237-015-0752-3 CrossRefPubMed Ganbat D, Kim YH, Kim K, Jin YJ, Park WM (2016) Effect of mechanical loading on heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15:1191–1199. doi:10.​1007/​s10237-015-0752-3 CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mo ZJ, Bin Zhao Y, Wang LZ, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan YB (2014) Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue. Eur Spine J 23:613–621. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3070-4 CrossRefPubMed Mo ZJ, Bin Zhao Y, Wang LZ, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan YB (2014) Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue. Eur Spine J 23:613–621. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-013-3070-4 CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Park J, Shin JJ, Lim J (2014) Biornechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery. World Neurosurg. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.013 Park J, Shin JJ, Lim J (2014) Biornechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery. World Neurosurg. doi:10.​1016/​j.​wneu.​2014.​06.​013
31.
go back to reference Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Renner SM, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG (2011) Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion. Spine 36:1932–1939. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc1aff Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Renner SM, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG (2011) Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion a biomechanical comparison  of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion. Spine 36:1932–1939. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181fc1aff​
33.
go back to reference Pan L, Yang X, Gu L, Lu W, Fang M (2011) Validation and prediction of traditional Chinese physical operation on spinal disease using multiple deformation models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol 6:201–208. doi:10.1007/s11548-010-0500-1 CrossRef Pan L, Yang X, Gu L, Lu W, Fang M (2011) Validation and prediction of traditional Chinese physical operation on spinal disease using multiple deformation models. Int J Comput Assist Radiol 6:201–208. doi:10.​1007/​s11548-010-0500-1 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of cervical disc replacement and fusion hybrid surgery with various geometry of ball-and-socket artificial disc
Authors
Yang Li
Guy R. Fogel
Zhenhua Liao
Weiqiang Liu
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1616-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 8/2017 Go to the issue