Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 2/2008

01-03-2008

Involving Local Health Departments in Community Health Partnerships: Evaluation Results from the Partnership for the Public’s Health Initiative

Authors: Allen Cheadle, Clarissa Hsu, Pamela M. Schwartz, David Pearson, Howard P. Greenwald, William L. Beery, George Flores, Maria Campbell Casey

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Improving community health “from the ground up” entails a comprehensive ecological approach, deep involvement of community-based entities, and addressing social determinants of population health status. Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Office of the Surgeon General, and other authorities have called for public health to be an “inter-sector” enterprise, few models have surfaced that feature local health departments as a key part of the collaborative model for effecting community-level change. This paper presents evaluation findings and lessons learned from the Partnership for the Public’s Health (PPH), a comprehensive community initiative that featured a central role for local health departments with their community partners. Funded by The California Endowment, PPH provided technical and financial resources to 39 community partnerships in 14 local health department jurisdictions in California to promote community and health department capacity building and community-level policy and systems change designed to produce long-term improvements in population health. The evaluation used multiple data sources to create progress ratings for each partnership in five goal areas related to capacity building, community health improvement programs, and policy and systems change. Overall results were generally positive; in particular, of the 37 partnerships funded continuously throughout the 5 years of the initiative, between 25% and 40% were able to make a high level of progress in each of the Initiative’s five goal areas. Factors associated with partnership success were also identified by local evaluators. These results showed that health departments able to work effectively with community groups had strong, committed leaders who used creative financing mechanisms, inclusive planning processes, organizational changes, and open communication to promote collaboration with the communities they served.
Literature
1.
go back to reference The National Community Care Network Demonstration Program, (CCN). Hospital Research and Educational Trust; April 1995. The National Community Care Network Demonstration Program, (CCN). Hospital Research and Educational Trust; April 1995.
2.
go back to reference Cheadle A, Senter S, Procello A, et al. The California wellness foundation’s health improvement initiative: evaluation findings and lessons learned. Am J Health Prom. 2005;19(4):286–296. Cheadle A, Senter S, Procello A, et al. The California wellness foundation’s health improvement initiative: evaluation findings and lessons learned. Am J Health Prom. 2005;19(4):286–296.
3.
go back to reference California Endowment. Work in Health Initiative. January 2000. California Endowment. Work in Health Initiative. January 2000.
4.
go back to reference The Colorado Trust. Partnerships for Health Initiative; 2005–2013. The Colorado Trust. Partnerships for Health Initiative; 2005–2013.
5.
go back to reference Wallerstein N. Power between evaluator and community research relationships within New Mexico’s healthier communities. Soc Sci Med. 1999;00:1–15. Wallerstein N. Power between evaluator and community research relationships within New Mexico’s healthier communities. Soc Sci Med. 1999;00:1–15.
6.
go back to reference Enhancing Community Capacity. California Healthy Cities and Communities Annual Conference, Center for Civic Partnership, San Diego, California; April 2000. Enhancing Community Capacity. California Healthy Cities and Communities Annual Conference, Center for Civic Partnership, San Diego, California; April 2000.
7.
go back to reference El-Askari G, Freestone J, Irizarry C, et al. The healthy neighborhoods project: a local health department’s role in catalyzing community development. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(2):146–159.PubMedCrossRef El-Askari G, Freestone J, Irizarry C, et al. The healthy neighborhoods project: a local health department’s role in catalyzing community development. Health Educ Behav. 1998;25(2):146–159.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anderson LM, Scrimshaw SC, Fullilove MT, Fielding JE, and the Task Force on Community Preventative Services. The community guide’s model for linking the social environment to health. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(3S):12–20.PubMedCrossRef Anderson LM, Scrimshaw SC, Fullilove MT, Fielding JE, and the Task Force on Community Preventative Services. The community guide’s model for linking the social environment to health. Am J Prev Med. 2003;24(3S):12–20.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Alter C, Hage J. Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993. Alter C, Hage J. Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993.
10.
go back to reference Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Res. 1993;8:315–330.PubMedCrossRef Butterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Res. 1993;8:315–330.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chavis DM. The paradoxes and promise of community coalitions. Am J Comm Psych. 2001;29(2):309–320.CrossRef Chavis DM. The paradoxes and promise of community coalitions. Am J Comm Psych. 2001;29(2):309–320.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lasker RD, Committee on Medicine and Public Health. Medicine and Public Health: The Power of Collaboration. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 1997. Lasker RD, Committee on Medicine and Public Health. Medicine and Public Health: The Power of Collaboration. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 1997.
13.
go back to reference The National Association of County and City Health Officials. The Community Public Health System Improvement Plan: A Blueprint for Transformation. The Turning Point Initiative, sponsored by the W.K. Kellogg and Robert Wood Johnson Foundations. The National Association of County and City Health Officials. The Community Public Health System Improvement Plan: A Blueprint for Transformation. The Turning Point Initiative, sponsored by the W.K. Kellogg and Robert Wood Johnson Foundations.
14.
go back to reference The National Association of County and City Health Officials. A Strategic Approach to Community Health Improvement: MAPP Field Guide. National Association of City and County Health Officials; 2007. The National Association of County and City Health Officials. A Strategic Approach to Community Health Improvement: MAPP Field Guide. National Association of City and County Health Officials; 2007.
15.
go back to reference COMMIT Research Group. Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. Am J Pub Health. 1995;85(2):183–192. COMMIT Research Group. Community intervention trial for smoking cessation (COMMIT): I. Cohort results from a four-year community intervention. Am J Pub Health. 1995;85(2):183–192.
16.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Wickizer TM, Cheadle A, et al. The community health promotion grants program in the West II: Changes in attitudes, environments and behaviors. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(3):561–589.PubMed Wagner EH, Wickizer TM, Cheadle A, et al. The community health promotion grants program in the West II: Changes in attitudes, environments and behaviors. Health Serv Res. 2000;35(3):561–589.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Shortell SM, Zukoski AP, Alexander JA, et al. Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002;27(1):49–91.PubMedCrossRef Shortell SM, Zukoski AP, Alexander JA, et al. Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002;27(1):49–91.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mitchell SM, Shortell SM. The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: a typology for research, policy, and practice. Milbank Quarterly. 2000;78(1):241–290.PubMedCrossRef Mitchell SM, Shortell SM. The governance and management of effective community health partnerships: a typology for research, policy, and practice. Milbank Quarterly. 2000;78(1):241–290.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Roussos TS, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Ann Rev Pub Health. 2000;21:369–402.CrossRef Roussos TS, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Ann Rev Pub Health. 2000;21:369–402.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Metzler MM, Higgins DL, Beeker CG, et al. Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships. Am J Pub Health. 2003;93:803–811.PubMedCrossRef Metzler MM, Higgins DL, Beeker CG, et al. Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships. Am J Pub Health. 2003;93:803–811.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Green L, Daniel M, Novick L. Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research. Pub Health Rep. 2001;116(supplement):20–31.CrossRef Green L, Daniel M, Novick L. Partnerships and coalitions for community-based research. Pub Health Rep. 2001;116(supplement):20–31.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Galea S, Factor SH, Foley M, et al. Collaboration among community members, local health service providers, and researchers in an urban research center in Harlem, New York. Public Health Reports. 2001;116:530–539.PubMed Galea S, Factor SH, Foley M, et al. Collaboration among community members, local health service providers, and researchers in an urban research center in Harlem, New York. Public Health Reports. 2001;116:530–539.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lasker R, Weiss ES. Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. J Urban Health. 2003;80(1):14–60.PubMed Lasker R, Weiss ES. Broadening participation in community problem solving: a multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research. J Urban Health. 2003;80(1):14–60.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Lantz P. Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships. Eval Program Plann. 2003;26:249–262.CrossRef Schulz AJ, Israel BA, Lantz P. Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships. Eval Program Plann. 2003;26:249–262.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Involving Local Health Departments in Community Health Partnerships: Evaluation Results from the Partnership for the Public’s Health Initiative
Authors
Allen Cheadle
Clarissa Hsu
Pamela M. Schwartz
David Pearson
Howard P. Greenwald
William L. Beery
George Flores
Maria Campbell Casey
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9260-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Journal of Urban Health 2/2008 Go to the issue

Literature in Brief

HIV/AIDS Reviews

Literature in Brief

Child and Adolescent Health