Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Urban Health 2/2006

01-03-2006

Spatial Equity in Facilities Providing Low- or No-Fee Screening Mammography in Chicago Neighborhoods

Authors: Shannon N. Zenk, Elizabeth Tarlov, Jiaming Sun

Published in: Journal of Urban Health | Issue 2/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Recent research suggests living in an economically disadvantaged neighborhood is associated with decreased likelihood of undergoing mammography and increased risk of late-stage breast cancer diagnosis. Long distances and travel times to facilities offering low- or no-fee mammography may be important barriers to adherence to mammography screening recommendations for women living in economically disadvantaged urban neighborhoods, in which African–Americans are disproportionately represented. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the spatial distribution of facilities providing low- or no-fee screening mammography in Chicago, Illinois, is equitable on the basis of neighborhood socioeconomic and racial characteristics. We found that distance and travel times via automobile and public transportation to facilities generally decrease as neighborhood poverty increases. However, we also found that the strength of the association between neighborhood poverty level and two of the spatial accessibility measures—distance and public transportation travel time—is less strong in African–American neighborhoods. Among neighborhoods with the greatest need for facilities (i.e., neighborhoods with the highest proportions of residents in poverty), African–American neighborhoods have longer travel distances and public transportation travel times than neighborhoods with proportionately fewer African–American residents. Thus, it appears that the spatial accessibility of low- and no-fee mammography services is inequitable in Chicago. In view of persistent social disparities in health such as breast cancer outcomes, these findings suggest it is important for researchers to examine the spatial distribution of health resources by both the socioeconomic and racial characteristics of urban neighborhoods.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(5):326–331.CrossRefPubMed Ayanian JZ, Kohler BA, Abe T, Epstein AM. The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(5):326–331.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(7):490–496.PubMed Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(7):490–496.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Franzini L, Williams AF, Franklin J, Singletary SE, Theriault RL. Effects of race and socioeconomic status on survival of 1,332 black, Hispanic, and white women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(2):111–118.CrossRefPubMed Franzini L, Williams AF, Franklin J, Singletary SE, Theriault RL. Effects of race and socioeconomic status on survival of 1,332 black, Hispanic, and white women with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(2):111–118.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Greenwald HP, Polissar NL, Dayal HH. Race, socioeconomic status and survival in three female cancers. Ethn Health. 1996;1(1):65–75.PubMedCrossRef Greenwald HP, Polissar NL, Dayal HH. Race, socioeconomic status and survival in three female cancers. Ethn Health. 1996;1(1):65–75.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Roetzheim RG, Gonzalez EC, Ferrante JM, Pal N, Van Durme DJ, Krischer JP. Effects of health insurance and race on breast carcinoma treatments and outcomes. Cancer J. 2000;89(11):2202–2213.CrossRef Roetzheim RG, Gonzalez EC, Ferrante JM, Pal N, Van Durme DJ, Krischer JP. Effects of health insurance and race on breast carcinoma treatments and outcomes. Cancer J. 2000;89(11):2202–2213.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Du W, Simon MS. Racial disparities in treatment and survival of women with stage I–III breast cancer at a large academic medical center in metropolitan Detroit. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;91(3):243–248.CrossRefPubMed Du W, Simon MS. Racial disparities in treatment and survival of women with stage I–III breast cancer at a large academic medical center in metropolitan Detroit. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;91(3):243–248.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Hsu JL, Glaser SL, West DW. Racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival among San Francisco Bay Area women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(17):1311–1312.CrossRefPubMed Hsu JL, Glaser SL, West DW. Racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival among San Francisco Bay Area women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89(17):1311–1312.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Joslyn SA, West MM. Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival. Cancer J. 2000;88(1):114–123.CrossRef Joslyn SA, West MM. Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival. Cancer J. 2000;88(1):114–123.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR. Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:49–56.CrossRefPubMed Li CI, Malone KE, Daling JR. Differences in breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival by race and ethnicity. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:49–56.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference O'Malley CD, Le GM, Glaser SL, Shema SJ, West DW. Socioeconomic status and breast carcinoma survival in four racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer J. 2003;97(5):1303–1311.CrossRef O'Malley CD, Le GM, Glaser SL, Shema SJ, West DW. Socioeconomic status and breast carcinoma survival in four racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer J. 2003;97(5):1303–1311.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Boyer-Chammard A, Taylor TH, Anton-Culver H. Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer Detect Prev. 1999;23(6):463–473.CrossRefPubMed Boyer-Chammard A, Taylor TH, Anton-Culver H. Survival differences in breast cancer among racial/ethnic groups: a population-based study. Cancer Detect Prev. 1999;23(6):463–473.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hunter CP, Redmond CK, Chen VW, et al. Breast cancer: factors associated with stage at diagnosis in black and white women. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(14):1129–1137.PubMedCrossRef Hunter CP, Redmond CK, Chen VW, et al. Breast cancer: factors associated with stage at diagnosis in black and white women. Black/White Cancer Survival Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(14):1129–1137.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schwartz KL, Crossley-May H, Vigneau FD, Brown K, Banerjee M. Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for five common malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:761–766.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz KL, Crossley-May H, Vigneau FD, Brown K, Banerjee M. Race, socioeconomic status and stage at diagnosis for five common malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. 2003;14:761–766.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference U.S.Preventive Services Task Force*. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5_Part_1):344–346. U.S.Preventive Services Task Force*. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5_Part_1):344–346.
16.
go back to reference Smith RA, Saslow D, ndrews Sawyer K, et al. American cancer society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2003;53(3):141–169. Smith RA, Saslow D, ndrews Sawyer K, et al. American cancer society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2003;53(3):141–169.
17.
go back to reference Practice Bulletin Number 42, April 2003: Breast cancer screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;101(4):821–832. Practice Bulletin Number 42, April 2003: Breast cancer screening. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;101(4):821–832.
18.
go back to reference Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L. Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(2):159–170.CrossRefPubMed Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L. Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(2):159–170.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer J. 2003;97(6):1528–1540.CrossRef Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer J. 2003;97(6):1528–1540.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Armstrong K, Long JA, Shea JA. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women. Prev Med. 2004;38(6):754–760.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong K, Long JA, Shea JA. Measuring adherence to mammography screening recommendations among low-income women. Prev Med. 2004;38(6):754–760.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Prevalence Data [database online]. Available: http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/brfss/. Atlanta, Georgia: USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1995–2004. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Prevalence Data [database online]. Available: http://​apps.​nccd.​cdc.​gov/​brfss/​. Atlanta, Georgia: USA Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1995–2004.
23.
go back to reference McPhee SJ, Nguyen TT, Shema SJ, et al. Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population. Prev Med. 2002;35(5):463–473.CrossRefPubMed McPhee SJ, Nguyen TT, Shema SJ, et al. Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population. Prev Med. 2002;35(5):463–473.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kirby JB, Kaneda T. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46(1):15–31.PubMedCrossRef Kirby JB, Kaneda T. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and access to health care. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46(1):15–31.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wells BL, Horm JW. Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(10):1484–1489.PubMedCrossRef Wells BL, Horm JW. Targeting the underserved for breast and cervical cancer screening: the utility of ecological analysis using the National Health Interview Survey. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(10):1484–1489.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Barry J, Breen N. The importance of place of residence in predicting late-stage diagnosis of breast or cervical cancer. Health Place. 2005;11(1):15–29.CrossRefPubMed Barry J, Breen N. The importance of place of residence in predicting late-stage diagnosis of breast or cervical cancer. Health Place. 2005;11(1):15–29.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Merkin BS, Stevenson L, Powe N. Geographic socioeconomic status, race and advanced stage breast cancer in New York City. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):64–70.PubMed Merkin BS, Stevenson L, Powe N. Geographic socioeconomic status, race and advanced stage breast cancer in New York City. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(1):64–70.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Marchick J, Henson DE. Correlations between access to mammography and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer J. 2005;103(8):1571–1580.CrossRef Marchick J, Henson DE. Correlations between access to mammography and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Cancer J. 2005;103(8):1571–1580.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Engelman KK, Hawley DB, Gazaway R, Mosier MC, Ahluwalia JS, Ellerbeck EF. Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(1):62–68.CrossRefPubMed Engelman KK, Hawley DB, Gazaway R, Mosier MC, Ahluwalia JS, Ellerbeck EF. Impact of geographic barriers on the utilization of mammograms by older rural women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(1):62–68.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Hyndman JC, Holman CD, Dawes VP. Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. J Med Screen. 2000;7(3):141–145.CrossRefPubMed Hyndman JC, Holman CD, Dawes VP. Effect of distance and social disadvantage on the response to invitations to attend mammography screening. J Med Screen. 2000;7(3):141–145.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kreher NE, Hickner JM, Ruffin MT, Lin CS. Effect of distance and travel time on rural women's compliance with screening mammography: an UPRNet study. Upper Peninsula Research Network. J Fam Pract. 1995;40(2):143–147.PubMed Kreher NE, Hickner JM, Ruffin MT, Lin CS. Effect of distance and travel time on rural women's compliance with screening mammography: an UPRNet study. Upper Peninsula Research Network. J Fam Pract. 1995;40(2):143–147.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Burgess JF, Jr, DeFiore DA. The effect of distance to VA facilities on the choice and level of utilization of VA outpatient services. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39(1):95–104.CrossRefPubMed Burgess JF, Jr, DeFiore DA. The effect of distance to VA facilities on the choice and level of utilization of VA outpatient services. Soc Sci Med. 1994;39(1):95–104.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Gregory PM, Malka ES, Kostis JB, Wilson AC, Arora JK, Rhoads GG. Impact of geographic proximity to cardiac revascularization services on service utilization. Med Care. 2000;38(1):45–57.CrossRefPubMed Gregory PM, Malka ES, Kostis JB, Wilson AC, Arora JK, Rhoads GG. Impact of geographic proximity to cardiac revascularization services on service utilization. Med Care. 2000;38(1):45–57.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference McCarthy JF, Blow FC. Older patients with serious mental illness: sensitivity to distance barriers for outpatient care. Med Care. 2004;42(11):1073–1080.CrossRefPubMed McCarthy JF, Blow FC. Older patients with serious mental illness: sensitivity to distance barriers for outpatient care. Med Care. 2004;42(11):1073–1080.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Mooney C, Zwanziger J, Phibbs CS, Schmitt S. Is travel distance a barrier to veterans' use of VA hospitals for medical surgical care? Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(12):1743–1755.CrossRefPubMed Mooney C, Zwanziger J, Phibbs CS, Schmitt S. Is travel distance a barrier to veterans' use of VA hospitals for medical surgical care? Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(12):1743–1755.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Rushton G, Peleg I, Banerjee A, Smith G, West M. Analyzing geographic patterns of disease incidence: rates of late-stage colorectal cancer in Iowa. J Med Syst. 2004;28(3):223–236.CrossRefPubMed Rushton G, Peleg I, Banerjee A, Smith G, West M. Analyzing geographic patterns of disease incidence: rates of late-stage colorectal cancer in Iowa. J Med Syst. 2004;28(3):223–236.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Guagliardo MF. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int J Health Geogr. 2004;3(1):3.CrossRefPubMed Guagliardo MF. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int J Health Geogr. 2004;3(1):3.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Suter LG, Nakano CY, Elmore JG. The personal costs and convenience of screening mammography. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;11(7):667–672.CrossRef Suter LG, Nakano CY, Elmore JG. The personal costs and convenience of screening mammography. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002;11(7):667–672.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference McAlearney AS, Reeves KW, Tatum C, Paskett ED. Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening. Cancer J. 2005;103(12):2473–2480.CrossRef McAlearney AS, Reeves KW, Tatum C, Paskett ED. Perceptions of insurance coverage for screening mammography among women in need of screening. Cancer J. 2005;103(12):2473–2480.CrossRef
41.
42.
go back to reference Kinman EL. Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):663–678.CrossRefPubMed Kinman EL. Evaluating health service equity at a primary care clinic in Chilimarca, Bolivia. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):663–678.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Talen E. School, community, and spatial equity: an empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2001;91(3):465–486.CrossRef Talen E. School, community, and spatial equity: an empirical investigation of access to elementary schools in West Virginia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 2001;91(3):465–486.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Guagliardo MF, Ronzio CR, Cheung I, Chacko E, Joseph JG. Physician accessibility: an urban case study of pediatric providers. Health Place. 2004;10(3):273–283.CrossRefPubMed Guagliardo MF, Ronzio CR, Cheung I, Chacko E, Joseph JG. Physician accessibility: an urban case study of pediatric providers. Health Place. 2004;10(3):273–283.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Abramson AJ, Tobin MS, VanderGoot MR. The changing geography of metropolitan opportunity: the segregation of the poor in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate. 1995;6(1):45–72. Abramson AJ, Tobin MS, VanderGoot MR. The changing geography of metropolitan opportunity: the segregation of the poor in U.S. metropolitan areas, 1970 to 1990. Housing Policy Debate. 1995;6(1):45–72.
48.
go back to reference Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Earls F. Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. Am Soc Rev. 1999;64(633–660). Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Earls F. Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. Am Soc Rev. 1999;64(633–660).
49.
go back to reference ArcView [computer program]. Version 3.3. Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute;1999–2002. ArcView [computer program]. Version 3.3. Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute;1999–2002.
51.
go back to reference Handy SL, Niemeier DA. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A. 1997;29:1175–1194.CrossRef Handy SL, Niemeier DA. Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Environment and Planning A. 1997;29:1175–1194.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Talen E. Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B. 2003;30:181–200.CrossRef Talen E. Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for evaluating pedestrian access. Environment and Planning B. 2003;30:181–200.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference ArcGIS Desktop [computer program]. Version 8.3. Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute;1999–2002. ArcGIS Desktop [computer program]. Version 8.3. Redlands, California: Environmental Systems Research Institute;1999–2002.
59.
go back to reference Vasiliev IR. Visualization of spatial dependence: an elementary view of spatial autocorrelation. In: Arlinghaus SL, Griffith DA, Arlinghaus WC, Drake WD, Nysteun JD, eds. Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC; 1995:17–30. Vasiliev IR. Visualization of spatial dependence: an elementary view of spatial autocorrelation. In: Arlinghaus SL, Griffith DA, Arlinghaus WC, Drake WD, Nysteun JD, eds. Practical Handbook of Spatial Statistics. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC; 1995:17–30.
60.
go back to reference Anselin L. Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis. 1988;20:1–17.CrossRef Anselin L. Lagrange multiplier test diagnostics for spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity. Geographical Analysis. 1988;20:1–17.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic; 1988. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic; 1988.
62.
go back to reference Hilkevitch J. CTA ride not worth fare in poorer areas, study says. Chicago Tribune. November 22, 2004:Page 1. Hilkevitch J. CTA ride not worth fare in poorer areas, study says. Chicago Tribune. November 22, 2004:Page 1.
63.
go back to reference McLafferty S. Urban structure and geographical access to public services. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1982;72(3):347–354.CrossRef McLafferty S. Urban structure and geographical access to public services. Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1982;72(3):347–354.CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Shen Q. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environment and Planning A. 1998;25:345–365.CrossRef Shen Q. Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environment and Planning A. 1998;25:345–365.CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Luo W, Wang FH. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B. 2003;30(6):865–884.CrossRef Luo W, Wang FH. Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B. 2003;30(6):865–884.CrossRef
66.
go back to reference McLafferty S, Grady S. Immigration and geographic access to prenatal clinics in Brooklyn, NY: a geographic information systems analysis. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(4):638–640.CrossRefPubMed McLafferty S, Grady S. Immigration and geographic access to prenatal clinics in Brooklyn, NY: a geographic information systems analysis. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(4):638–640.CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference Hyndman JC, D'Arcy C, Holman J, Pritchard DA. The influence of attractiveness factors and distance to general practice surgeries by level of social disadvantage and global access in Perth, Western Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):387–403.CrossRefPubMed Hyndman JC, D'Arcy C, Holman J, Pritchard DA. The influence of attractiveness factors and distance to general practice surgeries by level of social disadvantage and global access in Perth, Western Australia. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):387–403.CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Hyndman JC, Holman CD. Accessibility and spatial distribution of general practice services in an Australian city by levels of social disadvantage. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(12):1599–1609.CrossRefPubMed Hyndman JC, Holman CD. Accessibility and spatial distribution of general practice services in an Australian city by levels of social disadvantage. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(12):1599–1609.CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference LaVeist TA, Wallace JM. Health risk and inequitable distribution of liquor stores in African American neighborhoods. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:613–617.CrossRefPubMed LaVeist TA, Wallace JM. Health risk and inequitable distribution of liquor stores in African American neighborhoods. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:613–617.CrossRefPubMed
70.
go back to reference Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, James SA, Bao S, Wilson ML. Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:660–667.CrossRefPubMed Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, James SA, Bao S, Wilson ML. Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:660–667.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Spatial Equity in Facilities Providing Low- or No-Fee Screening Mammography in Chicago Neighborhoods
Authors
Shannon N. Zenk
Elizabeth Tarlov
Jiaming Sun
Publication date
01-03-2006
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Urban Health / Issue 2/2006
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Electronic ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-005-9023-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2006

Journal of Urban Health 2/2006 Go to the issue