Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Targeted Oncology 3/2024

Open Access 13-04-2024 | Regorafenib | Original Research Article

Efficacy of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil According to Extended RAS Evaluation in Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Authors: Michele Basso, Carlo Signorelli, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Jessica Lucchetti, Ina Valeria Zurlo, Emanuela Dell’Aquila, Giulia Arrivi, Federica Zoratto, Fiorenza Santamaria, Rosa Saltarelli, Giovanni Trovato, Giulia Caira, Lorenzo Angotti, Marta Schirripa, Annunziato Anghelone, Francesco Schietroma, Mario Giovanni Chilelli, Lisa Salvatore, Carmelo Pozzo, Giampaolo Tortora

Published in: Targeted Oncology | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are few molecular markers driving treatment selection in later lines of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer patients. The vast majority of patients who progress after first- and second-line therapy undergo chemotherapy regardless of molecular data.

Objective

We aimed to assess the prognostic and predictive effects of specific RAS mutations on overall survival of patients receiving regorafenib (rego), trifluridine/tipiracil (TFD/TPI), or both.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective observational study based on data from a previous study of our research network, involving nine Italian institutions over a 10-year timeframe (2012–2022). Extended RAS analysis, involving KRAS exon 2–4 and NRAS exon 2–4, and BRAF were the main criteria for inclusion in this retrospective evaluation. Patients with BRAF mutation were excluded. Patients were classified according to treatment (rego- or TFD/TPI-treated) and RAS mutational status (wild-type [WT], KRAS codon 12 mutations, KRAS codon 13 mutations, KRAS rare mutations and NRAS mutations, KRAS G12C mutation and KRAS G12D mutation).

Results

Overall, 582 patients were included in the present analysis. Overall survival did not significantly differ in rego-treated patients according to RAS extended analysis, although a trend toward a better median survival in patients carrying G12D mutation (12.0 months), Codon 13 mutation (8.0 months), and Codon 12 mutation (7.0 months) has been observed, when compared with WT patients (6.0 months). Overall survival did not significantly differ in TFD/TPI-treated patients according to RAS extended analysis, although a trend toward a better median survival in WT patients had been observed (9.0 months) in comparison with the entire population (7.0 months). Patients receiving both drugs displayed a longer survival when compared with the population of patients receiving rego alone (p = 0.005) as well as the population receiving TFD/TPI alone (p < 0.001), suggesting a group enriched for favorable prognostic factors. However, when each group was analyzed separately, the addition of TFD/TPI therapy to the rego-treated group improved survival only in all-RAS WT patients (p = 0.003). Differently, the addition of rego therapy to TFD/TPI-treated patients significantly improved OS in the Codon 12 group (p = 0.0004), G12D group (p = 0.003), and the rare mutations group (p = 0.02), in addition to all-RAS WT patients (p = 0.002). The rego-TFD/TPI sequence, compared with the reverse sequence, significantly improved OS only in the KRAS codon 12 group (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that RAS mutations do not affect outcome in rego-treated patients as well as TFD/TPI-treated patients. Nevertheless, a trend toward a higher efficacy of rego in RAS-mutated (in particular codon 12, rare RAS mutations, and G12D) patients has been recorded. The rego-TFD/TPI sequence seems to be superior to the reverse sequence in patients carrying an RAS codon 12 mutation, although the impact of other factors as disease burden or performance status cannot be excluded.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Benson AIB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer, version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:329–59.CrossRefPubMed Benson AIB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer, version 2.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:329–59.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, et al. Encorafenib plus cetuximab as a new standard of care for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: updated survival results and subgroup analyses from the BEACON study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:273–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tabernero J, Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, et al. Encorafenib plus cetuximab as a new standard of care for previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: updated survival results and subgroup analyses from the BEACON study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:273–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JJ, et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):1182–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JJ, et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):1182–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference André T, Shiu KK, Kim TW, et al. Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability–high advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2207–18.CrossRefPubMed André T, Shiu KK, Kim TW, et al. Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability–high advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(23):2207–18.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1909–19.CrossRefPubMed Mayer RJ, Van Cutsem E, Falcone A, et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1909–19.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–12.CrossRefPubMed Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, et al. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381:303–12.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dasari NA, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, et al. LBA25 FRESCO-2: a global phase III multiregional clinical trial (MRCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer [abstract]. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(Suppl 7):S1391–2.CrossRef Dasari NA, Lonardi S, Garcia-Carbonero R, et al. LBA25 FRESCO-2: a global phase III multiregional clinical trial (MRCT) evaluating the efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer [abstract]. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(Suppl 7):S1391–2.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moriwaki T, Fukuoka S, Taniguchi H, et al. Propensity score analysis of regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy (REGOTAS): a Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum multicenter observational study. Oncologist. 2018;23:7–15.CrossRefPubMed Moriwaki T, Fukuoka S, Taniguchi H, et al. Propensity score analysis of regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy (REGOTAS): a Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum multicenter observational study. Oncologist. 2018;23:7–15.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Masuishi T, Taniguchi H, Hamauchi S, et al. Regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16:e15-22.CrossRefPubMed Masuishi T, Taniguchi H, Hamauchi S, et al. Regorafenib versus trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017;16:e15-22.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tanaka A, Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, et al. Retrospective study of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil efficacy as a third-line or later chemotherapy regimen for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:6589–97.PubMedPubMedCentral Tanaka A, Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, et al. Retrospective study of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil efficacy as a third-line or later chemotherapy regimen for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:6589–97.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Ogata M, Kotaka M, Ogata T, et al. Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: a multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan. PLoS One. 2020;15: e0234314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ogata M, Kotaka M, Ogata T, et al. Regorafenib vs trifluridine/tipiracil for metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapies: a multicenter retrospective comparison study in Japan. PLoS One. 2020;15: e0234314.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Patel AK, Abhyankar R, Brais LK, et al. Trifluridine/tipiracil and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study at a tertiary oncology center. Oncologist. 2021;26:e2161-2169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patel AK, Abhyankar R, Brais LK, et al. Trifluridine/tipiracil and regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study at a tertiary oncology center. Oncologist. 2021;26:e2161-2169.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Nakashima M, Takeuchi M, Kawakami K. Effectiveness and safety of regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in unresectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020;19(4):e208–25.CrossRefPubMed Nakashima M, Takeuchi M, Kawakami K. Effectiveness and safety of regorafenib vs. Trifluridine/Tipiracil in unresectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020;19(4):e208–25.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Efficacy of Regorafenib and Trifluridine/Tipiracil According to Extended RAS Evaluation in Advanced Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis
Authors
Michele Basso
Carlo Signorelli
Maria Alessandra Calegari
Jessica Lucchetti
Ina Valeria Zurlo
Emanuela Dell’Aquila
Giulia Arrivi
Federica Zoratto
Fiorenza Santamaria
Rosa Saltarelli
Giovanni Trovato
Giulia Caira
Lorenzo Angotti
Marta Schirripa
Annunziato Anghelone
Francesco Schietroma
Mario Giovanni Chilelli
Lisa Salvatore
Carmelo Pozzo
Giampaolo Tortora
Publication date
13-04-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Targeted Oncology / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Electronic ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01050-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2024

Targeted Oncology 3/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine