Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Targeted Oncology 1/2015

01-03-2015 | Original Research

Early skin toxicity predicts better outcomes, and early tumor shrinkage predicts better response after cetuximab treatment in advanced colorectal cancer

Authors: T. Kogawa, A. Doi, M. Shimokawa, T. M. Fouad, T. Osuga, F. Tamura, T. Mizushima, T. Kimura, S. Abe, H. Ihara, T. Kukitsu, T. Sumiyoshi, N. Yoshizaki, M. Hirayama, T. Sasaki, Y. Kawarada, S. Kitashiro, S. Okushiba, H. Kondo, Y. Tsuji

Published in: Targeted Oncology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Cetuximab-containing treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer have been shown to have higher overall response rates and longer progression-free and overall survival than other systemic therapies. Cetuximab-related manifestations, including severe skin toxicity and early tumor shrinkage, have been shown to be predictors of response to cetuximab. We hypothesized that early skin toxicity is a predictor of response and better outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. We retrospectively evaluated 62 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma who had unresectable tumors and were treated with cetuximab in our institution. Skin toxicity grade was evaluated on each treatment day. Tumor size was evaluated using computed tomography prior to treatment and 4–8 weeks after the start of treatment with cetuximab.Patients with early tumor shrinkage after starting treatment with cetuximab had a significantly higher overall response rate (P = 0.0001). Patients with early skin toxicity showed significantly longer overall survival (P = 0.0305), and patients with higher skin toxicity grades had longer progression-free survival (P = 0.0168).We have shown that early tumor shrinkage, early onset of skin toxicity, and high skin toxicity grade are predictors of treatment efficacy and/or outcome in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma treated with cetuximab.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E et al (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1408–1417CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Hitre E et al (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1408–1417CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A et al (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:663–671CrossRefPubMed Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A et al (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:663–671CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L et al (2008) EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2311–2319CrossRefPubMed Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L et al (2008) EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2311–2319CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S et al (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:337–345CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S et al (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:337–345CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048CrossRefPubMed Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Garufi C, Torsello A, Tumolo S et al (2010) Cetuximab plus chronomodulated irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastases: POCHER trial. Br J Cancer 103:1542–1547CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Garufi C, Torsello A, Tumolo S et al (2010) Cetuximab plus chronomodulated irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastases: POCHER trial. Br J Cancer 103:1542–1547CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gunnar F, Thomas G, Wolf OB et al (2010) Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:38–47CrossRef Gunnar F, Thomas G, Wolf OB et al (2010) Tumour response and secondary resectability of colorectal liver metastases following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab: the CELIM randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11:38–47CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ye LC, Liu TS, Ren L et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases. J Clin Oncol 31:1931–1938CrossRefPubMed Ye LC, Liu TS, Ren L et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial of cetuximab plus chemotherapy for patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases. J Clin Oncol 31:1931–1938CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vincenzi B, Galluzzo S, Santini D et al (2011) Early magnesium modifications as a surrogate marker of efficacy of cetuximab-based anticancer treatment in KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol 22:1141–1146CrossRefPubMed Vincenzi B, Galluzzo S, Santini D et al (2011) Early magnesium modifications as a surrogate marker of efficacy of cetuximab-based anticancer treatment in KRAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer patients. Ann Oncol 22:1141–1146CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Piessevaux H, Buyse M, De Roock W et al (2009) Radiological tumor size decrease at week 6 is a potent predictor of outcome in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab (BOND trial). Ann Oncol 20:1375–1382CrossRefPubMed Piessevaux H, Buyse M, De Roock W et al (2009) Radiological tumor size decrease at week 6 is a potent predictor of outcome in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab (BOND trial). Ann Oncol 20:1375–1382CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zabaglo L, Stoss O, Ruschoff J et al. HER2 staining intensity in HER2-positive disease: relationship with FISH amplification and clinical outcome in the HERA trial of adjuvant trastuzumab. Ann Oncol 2013. Zabaglo L, Stoss O, Ruschoff J et al. HER2 staining intensity in HER2-positive disease: relationship with FISH amplification and clinical outcome in the HERA trial of adjuvant trastuzumab. Ann Oncol 2013.
12.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Thiede C, Bayerdörffer E, Blasczyk R et al (1996) Simple and sensitive detection of mutations in the ras proto-oncogenes using PNA-mediated PCR clamping. Nucleic Acids Res 24:983–984CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Thiede C, Bayerdörffer E, Blasczyk R et al (1996) Simple and sensitive detection of mutations in the ras proto-oncogenes using PNA-mediated PCR clamping. Nucleic Acids Res 24:983–984CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D et al (2006) KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 66:3992–3995CrossRefPubMed Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D et al (2006) KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 66:3992–3995CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V et al (2008) KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 26:374–379CrossRefPubMed Lievre A, Bachet JB, Boige V et al (2008) KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 26:374–379CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Rizzo S, Bronte G, Fanale D et al (2010) Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy? Cancer Treat Rev 36:S56–S61CrossRefPubMed Rizzo S, Bronte G, Fanale D et al (2010) Prognostic vs predictive molecular biomarkers in colorectal cancer: is KRAS and BRAF wild type status required for anti-EGFR therapy? Cancer Treat Rev 36:S56–S61CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gatzemeier U, von Pawel J, Vynnychenko I et al (2011) First-cycle rash and survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving cetuximab in combination with first-line chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of data from the FLEX phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 12:30–37CrossRefPubMed Gatzemeier U, von Pawel J, Vynnychenko I et al (2011) First-cycle rash and survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving cetuximab in combination with first-line chemotherapy: a subgroup analysis of data from the FLEX phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 12:30–37CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG et al (2011) Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet 377:2103–2114CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Maughan TS, Adams RA, Smith CG et al (2011) Addition of cetuximab to oxaliplatin-based first-line combination chemotherapy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: results of the randomised phase 3 MRC COIN trial. Lancet 377:2103–2114CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, Schmoll HJ (2004) Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol 22:1209–1214CrossRefPubMed Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, Schmoll HJ (2004) Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol 22:1209–1214CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tabernero J, Cervantes A, Rivera F et al (2010) Pharmacogenomic and pharmacoproteomic studies of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: biomarker analysis of a phase I dose-escalation study. J Clin Oncol 28:1181–1189CrossRefPubMed Tabernero J, Cervantes A, Rivera F et al (2010) Pharmacogenomic and pharmacoproteomic studies of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: biomarker analysis of a phase I dose-escalation study. J Clin Oncol 28:1181–1189CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Khelwatty SA, Essapen S, Seddon AM, Modjtahedi H (2013) Prognostic significance and targeting of HER family in colorectal cancer. Front Biosci 18:394–421CrossRef Khelwatty SA, Essapen S, Seddon AM, Modjtahedi H (2013) Prognostic significance and targeting of HER family in colorectal cancer. Front Biosci 18:394–421CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Petrelli F, Borgonovo K, Barni S (2013) The predictive role of skin rash with cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials. Target Oncol 8:173–181CrossRefPubMed Petrelli F, Borgonovo K, Barni S (2013) The predictive role of skin rash with cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials. Target Oncol 8:173–181CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Klinghammer K, Knodler M, Schmittel A et al (2010) Association of epidermal growth factor receptor polymorphism, skin toxicity, and outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving cetuximab-docetaxel treatment. Clin Cancer Res 16:304–310CrossRefPubMed Klinghammer K, Knodler M, Schmittel A et al (2010) Association of epidermal growth factor receptor polymorphism, skin toxicity, and outcome in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving cetuximab-docetaxel treatment. Clin Cancer Res 16:304–310CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Schwartz GH, Gollob JA et al (2004) Safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3003–3015CrossRefPubMed Rowinsky EK, Schwartz GH, Gollob JA et al (2004) Safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3003–3015CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Liu W, Innocenti F, Wu MH et al (2005) A functional common polymorphism in a Sp1 recognition site of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene promoter. Cancer Res 65:46–53PubMed Liu W, Innocenti F, Wu MH et al (2005) A functional common polymorphism in a Sp1 recognition site of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene promoter. Cancer Res 65:46–53PubMed
26.
go back to reference Li T, Perez-Soler R (2009) Skin toxicities associated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Target Oncol 4:107–119CrossRefPubMed Li T, Perez-Soler R (2009) Skin toxicities associated with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Target Oncol 4:107–119CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Romito F, Giuliani F, Cormio C et al (2010) Psychological effects of cetuximab-induced cutaneous rash in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 18:329–334CrossRefPubMed Romito F, Giuliani F, Cormio C et al (2010) Psychological effects of cetuximab-induced cutaneous rash in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 18:329–334CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Lang I, Kohne CH, Folprecht G et al (2013) Quality of life analysis in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated first-line with cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin. Eur J Cancer 49:439–448CrossRefPubMed Lang I, Kohne CH, Folprecht G et al (2013) Quality of life analysis in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated first-line with cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin. Eur J Cancer 49:439–448CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Stintzing S, Kapaun C, Laubender RP et al (2013) Prognostic value of cetuximab-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with parameters of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway: results from a randomized trial of the GERMAN AIO CRC Study Group. Int J Cancer 132:236–245CrossRefPubMed Stintzing S, Kapaun C, Laubender RP et al (2013) Prognostic value of cetuximab-related skin toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients and its correlation with parameters of the epidermal growth factor receptor signal transduction pathway: results from a randomized trial of the GERMAN AIO CRC Study Group. Int J Cancer 132:236–245CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Liu L, Cao Y, Tan A et al (2010) Cetuximab-based therapy vs noncetuximab therapy in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 12:399–406CrossRefPubMed Liu L, Cao Y, Tan A et al (2010) Cetuximab-based therapy vs noncetuximab therapy in advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 12:399–406CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Early skin toxicity predicts better outcomes, and early tumor shrinkage predicts better response after cetuximab treatment in advanced colorectal cancer
Authors
T. Kogawa
A. Doi
M. Shimokawa
T. M. Fouad
T. Osuga
F. Tamura
T. Mizushima
T. Kimura
S. Abe
H. Ihara
T. Kukitsu
T. Sumiyoshi
N. Yoshizaki
M. Hirayama
T. Sasaki
Y. Kawarada
S. Kitashiro
S. Okushiba
H. Kondo
Y. Tsuji
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Targeted Oncology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Electronic ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-014-0322-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Targeted Oncology 1/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine