Skip to main content
Top
Published in: HSS Journal ® 3/2012

01-10-2012 | Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip

The Development and Validation of a More Discriminating Functional Hip Score for Research

Authors: Sujith Konan, MRCS, Jenni Tahmassebi, BSc, Fares S. Haddad, MCh(Orth) FRCS(Orth)

Published in: HSS Journal ® | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a commonly performed procedure with increasing frequency in the young adult. While most available outcome measures can document postoperative improvement in pain and function, they do not measure the ability to perform high-demand activities.

Questions/Purposes

We present and validate a user-friendly discriminating hip scoring system (the functional hip score) for use in younger, “high-demand” patients undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery.

Methods

We studied 38 subjects without any hip symptoms and 72 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis of the hip. Preprocedure and postprocedure scores were collected in the latter cohort of patients. SF-36 and WOMAC scores were used to validate our functional scoring system. The functional hip score was tested for internal consistency, reliability, and criterion validity.

Results

The functional hip score had high test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and criterion validity. This can be used to measure functional outcome in the younger high-demand adult patient undergoing THA.

Conclusion

Our discriminating functional hip score can reliably measure improvement in hip function in the younger high-demand adult. Current scoring systems have ceiling effects and are unable to differentiate a high performing hip replacement from the routine hip replacement. The use of functional tasks that are measured objectively allows better documentation of improvement in hip function.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228.PubMed Amstutz HC, Thomas BJ, Jinnah R, Kim W, Grogan T, Yale C. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:228.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ashby E, Grocott MPW, Haddad FS. Outcome measures for orthopaedic interventions on hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:545-549.PubMedCrossRef Ashby E, Grocott MPW, Haddad FS. Outcome measures for orthopaedic interventions on hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:545-549.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM; Arthritis Cost and Outcome Project Group. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9:137-146.PubMedCrossRef Bachmeier CJ, March LM, Cross MJ, Lapsley HM, Tribe KL, Courtenay BG, Brooks PM; Arthritis Cost and Outcome Project Group. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001;9:137-146.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bardakos NV, Vasconcelos JC, Villar RN. Early outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the role of femoral osteoplasty in symptomatic improvement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(12):1570-5.PubMedCrossRef Bardakos NV, Vasconcelos JC, Villar RN. Early outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the role of femoral osteoplasty in symptomatic improvement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(12):1570-5.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke R, Leduff M, Amstutz HC. The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:547-552.PubMedCrossRef Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Hoke R, Leduff M, Amstutz HC. The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:547-552.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.PubMed Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305:160-164.PubMedCrossRef Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305:160-164.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Christensen CP, Althausen PL, Mittleman MA, Lee JA, McCarthy JC. The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:75-83.PubMedCrossRef Christensen CP, Althausen PL, Mittleman MA, Lee JA, McCarthy JC. The nonarthritic hip score: reliable and validated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:75-83.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:81-88.PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:81-88.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1125-1129.PubMedCrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Murray D. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1125-1129.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Feeny D, Wu L, Eng K. Comparing Short Form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1659-1670.PubMedCrossRef Feeny D, Wu L, Eng K. Comparing Short Form 6D, standard gamble, and Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 utility scores: results from total hip arthroplasty patients. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1659-1670.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 1992;30:917-925.PubMedCrossRef Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care. 1992;30:917-925.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kennedy D, Stratford PW, Pagura SMC, et al. Exploring the factorial validity and clinical interpretability of the WOMAC. Physiotherapy Canada. 2003;55:160-168.CrossRef Kennedy D, Stratford PW, Pagura SMC, et al. Exploring the factorial validity and clinical interpretability of the WOMAC. Physiotherapy Canada. 2003;55:160-168.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Feeny D, Wong C, Tugwell P, Leslie K, Bullas R. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1619-1626.PubMed Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Feeny D, Wong C, Tugwell P, Leslie K, Bullas R. The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1619-1626.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, Harris WH. The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:575-580.PubMedCrossRef Mahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, Harris WH. The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:575-580.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkowski MF. Comparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1323-1335.PubMed Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, Swiontkowski MF. Comparison of the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire with the Short Form-36, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and the Sickness Impact Profile health-status measures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1323-1335.PubMed
17.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1992;30(Suppl):MS253-265.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Rogers W, Raczek AE, Lu JF. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1992;30(Suppl):MS253-265.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:801-808.PubMedCrossRef Ostendorf M, van Stel HF, Buskens E, Schrijvers AJ, Marting LN, Verbout AJ, Dhert WJ. Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:801-808.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:189-197.PubMedCrossRef Söderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;384:189-197.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall A, Dick W, Theiler R. Comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and self-report format of the self administered Lequesne-Algo functional index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998;6:79-86.PubMedCrossRef Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall A, Dick W, Theiler R. Comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and self-report format of the self administered Lequesne-Algo functional index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998;6:79-86.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.PubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.PubMedCrossRef Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Development and Validation of a More Discriminating Functional Hip Score for Research
Authors
Sujith Konan, MRCS
Jenni Tahmassebi, BSc
Fares S. Haddad, MCh(Orth) FRCS(Orth)
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
HSS Journal ® / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Electronic ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-012-9298-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

HSS Journal ® 3/2012 Go to the issue

Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip

A Mid-Term Analysis Suggests Ceramic on Ceramic Hip Arthroplasty Is Durable with Minimal Wear and Low Risk of Squeak

Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip

Effect of Pelvic Osteotomy in the Skeletally Immature on Acetabular Coverage

Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip

Is it Time for Cementless Hip Resurfacing?

Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip

Current Topics Concerning Joint Preservation and Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Hip