Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Molecular Imaging and Biology
Published in: Molecular Imaging and Biology 1/2020

01-02-2020 | Positron Emission Tomography | Research Article

The Impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, Evaluated with Phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and Non-conventional Radionuclides

Authors: L. M. Carter, Adam Leon Kesner, E. C. Pratt, V. A. Sanders, A. V. F. Massicano, C. S. Cutler, S. E. Lapi, Jason S. Lewis

Published in: Molecular Imaging and Biology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The increasing interest and availability of non-standard positron-emitting radionuclides has heightened the relevance of radionuclide choice in the development and optimization of new positron emission tomography (PET) imaging procedures, both in preclinical research and clinical practice. Differences in achievable resolution arising from positron range can largely influence application suitability of each radionuclide, especially in small-ring preclinical PET where system blurring factors due to annihilation photon acollinearity and detector geometry are less significant. Some resolution degradation can be mitigated with appropriate range corrections implemented during image reconstruction, the quality of which is contingent on an accurate characterization of positron range.

Procedures

To address this need, we have characterized the positron range of several standard and non-standard PET radionuclides (As-72, F-18, Ga-68, Mn-52, Y-86, and Zr-89) through imaging of small-animal quality control phantoms on a benchmark preclinical PET scanner. Further, the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS v3.02) code was utilized for Monte Carlo modeling of positron range-dependent blurring effects.

Results

Positron range kernels for each radionuclide were derived from simulation of point sources in ICRP reference tissues. PET resolution and quantitative accuracy afforded by various radionuclides in practicable imaging scenarios were characterized using a convolution-based method based on positron annihilation distributions obtained from PHITS. Our imaging and simulation results demonstrate the degradation of small animal PET resolution, and quantitative accuracy correlates with increasing positron energy; however, for a specific “benchmark” preclinical PET scanner and reconstruction workflow, these differences were observed to be minimal given radionuclides with average positron energies below ~ 400 keV.

Conclusion

Our measurements and simulations of the influence of positron range on PET resolution compare well with previous efforts documented in the literature and provide new data for several radionuclides in increasing clinical and preclinical use. The results will support current and future improvements in methods for positron range corrections in PET imaging.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Laforest R, Liu X (2008) Image quality with non-standard nuclides in PET. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 52:151–158PubMed
2.
Bunka M, Müller C, Vermeulen C, Haller S, Türler A, Schibli R, van der Meulen NP (2016) Imaging quality of (44)Sc in comparison with five other PET radionuclides using Derenzo phantoms and preclinical PET. Appl Radiat Isot 110:129–133CrossRef
3.
Sanchez-Crespo A (2013) Comparison of gallium-68 and fluorine-18 imaging characteristics in positron emission tomography. Appl Radiat Isot 76:55–62CrossRef
4.
Sánchez-Crespo A, Andreo P, Larsson SA (2004) Positron flight in human tissues and its influence on PET image spatial resolution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31:44–51CrossRef
5.
6.
Peng H, Levin CS (2012) Study of PET intrinsic spatial resolution and contrast recovery improvement for PET/MRI systems. Phys Med Biol 57:N101–N115CrossRef
7.
Cal-González J, Herraiz JL, España S, Corzo PMG, Vaquero JJ, Desco M, Udias JM (2013) Positron range estimations with PeneloPET. Phys Med Biol 58:5127–5152CrossRef
8.
Champion C, Loirec CL (2006) Positron follow-up in liquid water: I. A new Monte Carlo track-structure code. Phys Med Biol 51:1707–1723CrossRef
9.
10.
Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Huang S-C, Ter-Pogossian MM (1975) Effect of positron range on spatial resolution. J Nucl Med 16:649–652PubMed
11.
Cho ZH, Chan JK, Ericksson L, Singh M, Graham S, MacDonald N, Yano Y (1975) Positron ranges obtained from biomedically important positron-emitting radionuclides. J Nucl Med 16:1174–1176PubMed
12.
Derenzo SE (1979) Precision measurement of annihilation point spread distributions for medically important positron emitters. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on positron annihilation
13.
Sato T, Niita K, Matsuda N, Hashimoto S, Iwamoto Y, Furuta T, Noda S, Ogawa T, Iwase H, Nakashima H, Fukahori T, Okumura K, Kai T, Chiba S, Sihver L (2015) Overview of particle and heavy ion transport code system PHITS. Ann Nucl Energy 82:110–115CrossRef
14.
Sato T, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, Ogawa T, Furuta T, Abe SI, Kai T, Tsai PE, Matsuda N, Iwase H, Shigyo N, Sihver L, Niita K (2018) Features of particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) version 3.02. J Nucl Sci Technol 55:684–690CrossRef
15.
Iwamoto Y, Sato T, Hashimoto S, Ogawa T, Furuta T, Abe SI, Kai T, Matsuda N, Hosoyamada R, Niita K (2017) Benchmark study of the recent version of the PHITS code. J Nucl Sci Technol 54:617–635CrossRef
16.
Furuta T, Sato T, Han MC, Yeom YS, Kim CH, Brown JL, Bolch WE (2017) Implementation of tetrahedral-mesh geometry in Monte Carlo radiation transport code PHITS. Phys Med Biol 62:4798–4810CrossRef
17.
Endo A, Yamaguchi Y (2001) Compilation of new nuclear decay data files used for dose calculation. J Nucl Sci Technol 38:689–696CrossRef
18.
Alva-Sánchez H, Quintana-Bautista C, Martínez-Dávalos A, Ávila-Rodríguez MA, Rodríguez-Villafuerte M (2016) Positron range in tissue-equivalent materials: experimental microPET studies. Phys Med Biol 61:6307–6321CrossRef
19.
20.
Dogdas B, Stout D, Chatziioannou AF, Leahy RM (2007) Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data. Phys Med Biol 52:577–587CrossRef
21.
22.
Disselhorst JA, Boerman OC, Oyen WJG, Slump CH, Visser EP (2010) Spatial resolution of the Inveon small-animal PET scanner for the entire field of view. Nucl Instrum Method A 615:245–248CrossRef
23.
Visser EP, Disselhorst JA, Brom M, Laverman P, Gotthardt M, Oyen WJ, Boerman OC (2009) Spatial resolution and sensitivity of the Inveon small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med 50:139–147CrossRef
24.
Holland JP, Divilov V, Bander NH, Smith-Jones PM, Larson SM, Lewis JS (2010) 89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo. J Nucl Med 51:1293–1300CrossRef
25.
26.
27.
Graves SA, Hernandez R, Fonslet J, England CG, Valdovinos HF, Ellison PA, Barnhart TE, Elema DR, Theuer CP, Cai W, Nickles RJ, Severin GW (2015) Novel preparation methods of (52)Mn for immunoPET imaging. Bioconjug Chem 26:2118–2124CrossRef
28.
Cox BL, Graves SA, Farhoud M et al (2016) Development of a novel linearly-filled Derenzo microPET phantom. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 6:199–204PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
DeGraffenreid AJ, Feng Y, Barnes CL et al (2016) Trithiols and their arsenic compounds for potential use in diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Nucl Med Biol 43:288–295CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, Evaluated with Phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and Non-conventional Radionuclides
Authors
L. M. Carter
Adam Leon Kesner
E. C. Pratt
V. A. Sanders
A. V. F. Massicano
C. S. Cutler
S. E. Lapi
Jason S. Lewis
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Molecular Imaging and Biology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1536-1632
Electronic ISSN: 1860-2002
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-019-01337-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Molecular Imaging and Biology 1/2020 Go to the issue

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor re: Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with [18F]DCFPyL: Impact of Tumor Burden on Normal Organ Uptake

Research Article

Renal Damages in Deoxycorticosterone Acetate–Salt Hypertensive Rats: Assessment with Diffusion Tensor Imaging and T2-mapping

Correction

Correction to: Letter to the Editor re: Semiquantitative Parameters in PSMA-Targeted PET Imaging with [18F]DCFPyL: Impact of Tumor Burden on Normal Organ Uptake

Research Article

Molecular Imaging of a Zirconium-89 Labeled Antibody Targeting Plasmodium falciparum–Infected Human Erythrocytes

Research Article

Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [68Ga]Citrate and [90Y]Microspheres PET Image Reconstructions Using Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization Algorithm

Editorial

Changing of the Guard at Molecular Imaging & Biology