Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral Radiology 1/2013

01-01-2013 | Original Article

Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of vertical root fractures: an in vitro study

Authors: Kaan Gunduz, Hakan Avsever, Kaan Orhan, Peruze Çelenk, Bilal Ozmen, Ersan Cicek, Erol Egrioglu, Ümit Karaçaylı

Published in: Oral Radiology | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of two different cone-beam computed tomography units, a photostimulated phosphor sensor (PSP), conventional film, and a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor for detecting vertical root fractures.

Methods

Ninety extracted human mandibular single-rooted premolar teeth without root fractures were numbered and divided into two groups: a control group of 45 teeth with no fractures and a test group of 45 teeth with fractures. The teeth were randomly placed in the empty mandibular premolar sockets of a dry human mandible. Each tooth was imaged using the following modalities: 3D Accuitomo 170; NewTom 3G; VistaScan PSP; CCD sensor; and conventional film. Kappa coefficients were calculated to assess the intra- and interobserver agreements for each image set. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the scores assigned to all the imaging systems and evaluate the observers’ ability to differentiate between teeth with and without vertical root fractures.

Results

The 3D Accuitomo 170 4 × 4-cm field of view was found to detect artificially induced vertical root fractures significantly better than the NewTom 3G 6-in. field of view, VistaScan PSP, CCD sensor, and conventional film images.

Conclusions

The 3D Accuitomo 170 was significantly superior to the NewTom 3G, VistaScan PSP, CCD sensor, and conventional film images in the detection of artificially induced vertical root fractures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Varshosaz M, Tavakoli MA, Mostafavi M, Baghban AA. Comparison of conventional radiography with cone beam computed tomography for detection of vertical root fractures: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci. 2010;52:593–7.PubMedCrossRef Varshosaz M, Tavakoli MA, Mostafavi M, Baghban AA. Comparison of conventional radiography with cone beam computed tomography for detection of vertical root fractures: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci. 2010;52:593–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zou X, Liu D, Yue L, Wu M. The ability of cone-beam computerized tomography to detect vertical root fractures in endodontically treated and nonendodontically treated teeth: a report of 3 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:797–801.PubMedCrossRef Zou X, Liu D, Yue L, Wu M. The ability of cone-beam computerized tomography to detect vertical root fractures in endodontically treated and nonendodontically treated teeth: a report of 3 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:797–801.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rivera EM, Walton RE. Longitudinal tooth fracture. In: Torabinejad M, Walton RE, editors. Endodontics principle and practice. 4th ed. St Louis: Saunders; 2009. p. 108–28. Rivera EM, Walton RE. Longitudinal tooth fracture. In: Torabinejad M, Walton RE, editors. Endodontics principle and practice. 4th ed. St Louis: Saunders; 2009. p. 108–28.
4.
go back to reference Bergenholtz G, Hasselgren G. Endodontics and periodontics. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, editors. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003. p. 318–51. Bergenholtz G, Hasselgren G. Endodontics and periodontics. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP, editors. Clinical periodontology and implant dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003. p. 318–51.
5.
go back to reference Bender IB, Freedland JB. Adult root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;107:413–9.PubMed Bender IB, Freedland JB. Adult root fracture. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;107:413–9.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16:498–504.PubMedCrossRef Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 1990;16:498–504.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod. 1991;17:338–42.PubMedCrossRef Vire DE. Failure of endodontically treated teeth: classification and evaluation. J Endod. 1991;17:338–42.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tamse A, Zilburg I, Halpern D. Vertical root fracture in adjacent maxillary premolars: an endodontic–prosthetic perplexity. Int Endod J. 1998;31:127–32.PubMedCrossRef Tamse A, Zilburg I, Halpern D. Vertical root fracture in adjacent maxillary premolars: an endodontic–prosthetic perplexity. Int Endod J. 1998;31:127–32.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tamse A. Iatrogenic vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988;4:190–6.PubMedCrossRef Tamse A. Iatrogenic vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1988;4:190–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kositbowornchai S, Nuansakul R, Sikram S, Sinahawattana S, Saengmontri S. Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30:106–9.PubMedCrossRef Kositbowornchai S, Nuansakul R, Sikram S, Sinahawattana S, Saengmontri S. Root fracture detection: a comparison of direct digital radiography with conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30:106–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lam EWN. Trauma to teeth and facial structures. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation, 6th edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2009. p. 542–8. Lam EWN. Trauma to teeth and facial structures. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ, editors. Oral radiology. Principles and interpretation, 6th edn. St. Louis: Mosby; 2009. p. 542–8.
13.
go back to reference Tsesis I, Kamburoğlu K, Katz A, Tamse A, Kaffe I, Kfir A. Comparison of digital with conventional radiography in detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:124–8.PubMedCrossRef Tsesis I, Kamburoğlu K, Katz A, Tamse A, Kaffe I, Kfir A. Comparison of digital with conventional radiography in detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:124–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod. 2009;35:719–22.PubMedCrossRef Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod. 2009;35:719–22.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75–80.PubMed Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72:75–80.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:707–30.PubMedCrossRef Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:707–30.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:825–41.PubMedCrossRef Tyndall DA, Rathore S. Cone-beam CT diagnostic applications: caries, periodontal bone assessment, and endodontic applications. Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:825–41.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Nair MK, Nair UP, Gröndahl H-G, Webber RL, Wallace JA. Detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures using tuned aperture computed tomography. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:375–9.PubMedCrossRef Nair MK, Nair UP, Gröndahl H-G, Webber RL, Wallace JA. Detection of artificially induced vertical radicular fractures using tuned aperture computed tomography. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:375–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Youssefzadeh S, Gahleitner A, Dorffner R, Bernhart T, Kainberger FM. Dental vertical root fractures: value of CT in detection. Radiology. 1999;210:545–9.PubMed Youssefzadeh S, Gahleitner A, Dorffner R, Bernhart T, Kainberger FM. Dental vertical root fractures: value of CT in detection. Radiology. 1999;210:545–9.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Hannig C, Dullin C, Hulsmann M, Heidrich G. Three-dimensional, nondestructive visualization of vertical root fractures using flat panel volume detector computer tomography: an ex vivo in vitro case report. Int Endod J. 2005;38:904–13.PubMedCrossRef Hannig C, Dullin C, Hulsmann M, Heidrich G. Three-dimensional, nondestructive visualization of vertical root fractures using flat panel volume detector computer tomography: an ex vivo in vitro case report. Int Endod J. 2005;38:904–13.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kamburoğlu K, Murat S, Yüksel SP, Cebeci AR, Horasan S. Detection of vertical root fracture using cone-beam computerized tomography: an in vitro assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e74–81.PubMed Kamburoğlu K, Murat S, Yüksel SP, Cebeci AR, Horasan S. Detection of vertical root fracture using cone-beam computerized tomography: an in vitro assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e74–81.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Monagham P, Bajalcaliev JG, Kaminski EJ, Lautenschlanger EP. A method for producing experimental simple vertical root fractures in dog teeth. J Endod. 1993;19:512–5.CrossRef Monagham P, Bajalcaliev JG, Kaminski EJ, Lautenschlanger EP. A method for producing experimental simple vertical root fractures in dog teeth. J Endod. 1993;19:512–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Húngaro Duarte MA, Azevedo BC, de Azevedo JR, Bramante CM. Use of cone-beam volumetric tomography in the diagnosis of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:270–7. Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Húngaro Duarte MA, Azevedo BC, de Azevedo JR, Bramante CM. Use of cone-beam volumetric tomography in the diagnosis of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:270–7.
25.
go back to reference Tanimoto H, Arai Y. The effect of voxel size on image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2009;25:149–53.CrossRef Tanimoto H, Arai Y. The effect of voxel size on image reconstruction in cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2009;25:149–53.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Stewart CB. Radiologic science for technologists: physics, biology, and protection. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1988. Stewart CB. Radiologic science for technologists: physics, biology, and protection. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1988.
27.
go back to reference ICRP. ICRP publication 60: 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP, vol 21. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1991. ICRP. ICRP publication 60: 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Annals of the ICRP, vol 21. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1991.
28.
go back to reference Lofthag-Hansen S. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2009;209:4–55.PubMed Lofthag-Hansen S. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2009;209:4–55.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of intraoral radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of vertical root fractures: an in vitro study
Authors
Kaan Gunduz
Hakan Avsever
Kaan Orhan
Peruze Çelenk
Bilal Ozmen
Ersan Cicek
Erol Egrioglu
Ümit Karaçaylı
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Oral Radiology / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0911-6028
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9674
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-012-0098-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Oral Radiology 1/2013 Go to the issue