Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 1/2011

01-03-2011 | Urology – Original Paper

Prostate-specific antigen test result interpretation when combined with risk factors for recommendation of biopsy: a survey of urologist’s practice patterns

Authors: Nathan Lawrentschuk, Nikhil Daljeet, Clement Ma, Karen Hersey, Alexandre Zlotta, Neil Fleshner

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Recent data have suggested historical cutoff levels for prostate cancer (PC) screening using a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level ≤ 4 ng/ml may no longer be appropriate with cancer detected at lower levels, particularly in younger men. Our aim was to conduct a contemporary survey of urologist’s practice patterns toward PC detection, specifically focusing on factors determining the decision to recommend ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-BX).

Methods

Three hundred and sixty active urologists from the Canadian Urological Association were requested to complete an online questionnaire focusing on scenarios of varying age, family history, ethnicity and PSA. Urologists indicated when to TRUS-BX.

Results

Of 360 urologists, 125 (35%) completed the questionnaire. Sixty-seven percent indicated men should be screened for PC aged 50–60 with 27% preferring 40–50 years. Seventy-seven percent would continue screening >75. Considering a 65-year-old man with no risk factors and a normal digital rectal exam 56% would offer TRUS-BX at PSA 4.5; 35% at 3.5 and 10% at 2.5 ng/ml. Considering a similar 45-year-old man, 94% would at PSA 4.5; 77% at 3.5 and 33% at 2.5 ng/ml. On multivariate analysis, offering TRUS-BX appears driven significantly (P < 0.0001) more by younger age and higher PSA (OR 4.3–20.6 and 4.4–34.9, respectively) rather than family history or ethnicity (OR 3.3 and 1.8, respectively).

Conclusions

Age and PSA appear the driving factors in obtaining TRUS-BX. Also, a significant proportion of urologists would still not offer TRUS-BX at the traditional PSA cutoff of 4 ng/ml for men with no risk factors. Further studies are required to ascertain whether this relates to a lack of dissemination of studies into practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL III et al (2009) Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 360:1310PubMedCrossRef Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL III et al (2009) Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med 360:1310PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al (2009) Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 360:1320PubMedCrossRef Schroder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ et al (2009) Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 360:1320PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Le BV, Griffin CR, Loeb S, Carvalhal GF, Kan D, Baumann NA, Catalona WJ (2010) [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 183(4):1355–1359PubMedCrossRef Le BV, Griffin CR, Loeb S, Carvalhal GF, Kan D, Baumann NA, Catalona WJ (2010) [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 183(4):1355–1359PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stopiglia RM, Ferreira U, Silva MM Jr et al (2010) Prostate specific antigen decrease and prostate cancer diagnosis: antibiotic versus placebo prospective randomized clinical trial. J Urol 183:940PubMedCrossRef Stopiglia RM, Ferreira U, Silva MM Jr et al (2010) Prostate specific antigen decrease and prostate cancer diagnosis: antibiotic versus placebo prospective randomized clinical trial. J Urol 183:940PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tang P, Sun L, Uhlman MA et al (2010) Initial prostate specific antigen 1.5 ng/ml or greater in men 50 years old or younger predicts higher prostate cancer risk. J Urol 183:946PubMedCrossRef Tang P, Sun L, Uhlman MA et al (2010) Initial prostate specific antigen 1.5 ng/ml or greater in men 50 years old or younger predicts higher prostate cancer risk. J Urol 183:946PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Thaxton CS, Loeb S, Roehl KA, Kan D, Catalona WJ (2010) Treatment outcomes of radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for 3 published active surveillance protocols. Urology 75(2):414–418CrossRef Thaxton CS, Loeb S, Roehl KA, Kan D, Catalona WJ (2010) Treatment outcomes of radical prostatectomy in potential candidates for 3 published active surveillance protocols. Urology 75(2):414–418CrossRef
7.
9.
go back to reference Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y et al (2010) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 183:963PubMedCrossRef Nam RK, Saskin R, Lee Y et al (2010) Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 183:963PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tang P, Xie KJ, Wang B et al (2010) Antibacterial therapy improves the effectiveness of prostate cancer detection using prostate-specific antigen in patients with asymptomatic prostatitis. Int Urol Nephrol 42:13PubMedCrossRef Tang P, Xie KJ, Wang B et al (2010) Antibacterial therapy improves the effectiveness of prostate cancer detection using prostate-specific antigen in patients with asymptomatic prostatitis. Int Urol Nephrol 42:13PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Renterghem K, Van Koeveringe G, Achten R et al (2010) A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies. Int Urol Nephrol 42:29PubMedCrossRef van Renterghem K, Van Koeveringe G, Achten R et al (2010) A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies. Int Urol Nephrol 42:29PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C et al (2006) Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:529PubMedCrossRef Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C et al (2006) Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:529PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM et al (2003) The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 349:215PubMedCrossRef Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM et al (2003) The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 349:215PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Stamey TA (2004) The era of serum prostate specific antigen as a marker for biopsy of the prostate and detecting prostate cancer is now over in the USA. BJU Int 94:963PubMedCrossRef Stamey TA (2004) The era of serum prostate specific antigen as a marker for biopsy of the prostate and detecting prostate cancer is now over in the USA. BJU Int 94:963PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Carroll P, Albertsen P, Greene K et al (2009) AUA Prostate-specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc Carroll P, Albertsen P, Greene K et al (2009) AUA Prostate-specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc
18.
go back to reference Eggener SE, Mueller A, Berglund RK et al (2009) A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1635PubMedCrossRef Eggener SE, Mueller A, Berglund RK et al (2009) A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 181:1635PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nogueira L, Corradi R, Eastham JA (2010) Other biomarkers for detecting prostate cancer. BJU Int 105(2):166–169PubMedCrossRef Nogueira L, Corradi R, Eastham JA (2010) Other biomarkers for detecting prostate cancer. BJU Int 105(2):166–169PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K et al (2006) PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA 296:2336PubMedCrossRef Walter LC, Bertenthal D, Lindquist K et al (2006) PSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectancies. JAMA 296:2336PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schaeffer EM, Carter HB, Kettermann A et al (2009) Prostate specific antigen testing among the elderly–when to stop? J Urol 181:1606PubMedCrossRef Schaeffer EM, Carter HB, Kettermann A et al (2009) Prostate specific antigen testing among the elderly–when to stop? J Urol 181:1606PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fleshner N, Rakovitch E, Klotz L (2000) Differences between urologists in the United States and Canada in the approach to prostate cancer. J Urol 163:1461PubMedCrossRef Fleshner N, Rakovitch E, Klotz L (2000) Differences between urologists in the United States and Canada in the approach to prostate cancer. J Urol 163:1461PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Screening for prostate cancer (2008) US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149:185 Screening for prostate cancer (2008) US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 149:185
24.
go back to reference Greene KL, Albertsen PC, Babaian RJ et al (2009) Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. J Urol 182:2232PubMedCrossRef Greene KL, Albertsen PC, Babaian RJ et al (2009) Prostate specific antigen best practice statement: 2009 update. J Urol 182:2232PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG et al (1993) Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA 270:860PubMedCrossRef Oesterling JE, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG et al (1993) Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges. JAMA 270:860PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Anderson JR, Strickland D, Corbin D et al (1995) Age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen. Urology 46:54PubMedCrossRef Anderson JR, Strickland D, Corbin D et al (1995) Age-specific reference ranges for serum prostate-specific antigen. Urology 46:54PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Choo R, DeBoer G, Klotz L et al (2001) PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:615PubMedCrossRef Choo R, DeBoer G, Klotz L et al (2001) PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:615PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Reissigl A, Pointner J, Horninger W et al (1995) Comparison of different prostate-specific antigen cutpoints for early detection of prostate cancer: results of a large screening study. Urology 46:662PubMedCrossRef Reissigl A, Pointner J, Horninger W et al (1995) Comparison of different prostate-specific antigen cutpoints for early detection of prostate cancer: results of a large screening study. Urology 46:662PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Plawker MW, Fleisher JM, Vapnek EM et al (1997) Current trends in prostate cancer diagnosis and staging among United States urologists. J Urol 158:1853PubMedCrossRef Plawker MW, Fleisher JM, Vapnek EM et al (1997) Current trends in prostate cancer diagnosis and staging among United States urologists. J Urol 158:1853PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prostate-specific antigen test result interpretation when combined with risk factors for recommendation of biopsy: a survey of urologist’s practice patterns
Authors
Nathan Lawrentschuk
Nikhil Daljeet
Clement Ma
Karen Hersey
Alexandre Zlotta
Neil Fleshner
Publication date
01-03-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9772-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

International Urology and Nephrology 1/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine