Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 1/2008

01-03-2008 | Original Article

The impact of pelvicaliceal features on problematic lower pole stone clearance in different age groups

Authors: Serhat Gurocak, Bora Kupeli, Cenk Acar, Mustafa Ozgur Tan, Ustunol Karaoglan, Ibrahim Bozkirli

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

Our aim was to evaluate the impact of pelvicaliceal variables in pediatric and adult age groups who underwent SWL for lower caliceal calculi.

Methods

25 pediatric and 78 adult patients treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) between 1996 and 2004 were enrolled into the study after exclusion of patients with hydronephrosis, major renal anatomic anomalies, non-calcium stones, history of recurrent stone disease and previous renal surgery. Lower pole infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular length (IL), infundibular width (IW) and pelvicaliceal volume were measured from pre-SWL intravenous urography. The pelvicaliceal stone load (PSL) index implicating the stone burden of each patient described as the relationship between stone volume and total estimated pelvicaliceal volume for stone-bearing kidney was also calculated.

Results

Sixty-eight percent of adult and 80% of pediatric patients became stone-free after SWL. The statistical insignificance between PSL index (p = 0.097) of two groups shows that both groups shared a similar stone burden. According to SWL outcome, mean IPA values of stone-free and residual patients were 46.85° and 30° in pediatric group, respectively (p = 0.01), whereas these values were 48.08° and 43.06° in the adult group, respectively (p = 0.352). In the pediatric age group, stone-free and cumulative success rates increased with increasing IPA but this correlation was statistically insignificant (p: 0.263).

Conclusions

Lower caliceal anatomy has a higher impact on stone clearance after SWL in pediatric patients and urologists can expect better SWL outcomes from pediatric population with solitary lower caliceal stone than adults under the same conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaussy C, Schmeidt E, Jocham D (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 125:417–420 Chaussy C, Schmeidt E, Jocham D (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 125:417–420
2.
go back to reference Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ (1989) Current state and future development of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 141:782–789PubMed Chaussy CG, Fuchs GJ (1989) Current state and future development of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 141:782–789PubMed
3.
go back to reference Viswaroop B, Anthony D, Gnanaraj L, Chacko N, Kekre N, Gopalalrishnan G (2005) Radiographic anatomical factors do not predict clearance of lower caliceal calculus by shock-wave lithotripsy. Scan J Urol Nephrol 39:226–229CrossRef Viswaroop B, Anthony D, Gnanaraj L, Chacko N, Kekre N, Gopalalrishnan G (2005) Radiographic anatomical factors do not predict clearance of lower caliceal calculus by shock-wave lithotripsy. Scan J Urol Nephrol 39:226–229CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhuis AW, Woods JR (1994) Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 151:663–667PubMed Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhuis AW, Woods JR (1994) Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 151:663–667PubMed
5.
go back to reference Paric D, Manak T, Kumstat P, Turjanica M, Kladensky J (1997) Effectiveness of SWL for lower pole calyceal nephrolithiasis: evaluation of 452 cases. J Endourol 11(5):305–307CrossRef Paric D, Manak T, Kumstat P, Turjanica M, Kladensky J (1997) Effectiveness of SWL for lower pole calyceal nephrolithiasis: evaluation of 452 cases. J Endourol 11(5):305–307CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chen RN, Streem SB (1996) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long term radiologic and clinical outcome. J Urol 156(5):1572–1575PubMedCrossRef Chen RN, Streem SB (1996) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long term radiologic and clinical outcome. J Urol 156(5):1572–1575PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cass AS, Grine WB, Jenkins J Mc, Jordan WR, Mobley TB, Myers DA (1998) The incidence of lower pole nephrolithiasis-increasing or not? Br J Urol 82:12–15PubMed Cass AS, Grine WB, Jenkins J Mc, Jordan WR, Mobley TB, Myers DA (1998) The incidence of lower pole nephrolithiasis-increasing or not? Br J Urol 82:12–15PubMed
8.
go back to reference Dretler SP (1988) Stone fragility: a new therapeutic distinction. J Urol 139:1124–1127PubMed Dretler SP (1988) Stone fragility: a new therapeutic distinction. J Urol 139:1124–1127PubMed
9.
go back to reference Brownlee N, Foster M, Griffith DP, Carlton GE Jr (1990) Controlled inversion therapy: an adjunct to the elimination of gravity dependent fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 143:1096–1098PubMed Brownlee N, Foster M, Griffith DP, Carlton GE Jr (1990) Controlled inversion therapy: an adjunct to the elimination of gravity dependent fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 143:1096–1098PubMed
10.
go back to reference Tolon M, Miroglu C, Erol H et al (1991) A report on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results on 1,569 renal units in an outpatient clinic. J Urol 145(4):695–698PubMed Tolon M, Miroglu C, Erol H et al (1991) A report on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results on 1,569 renal units in an outpatient clinic. J Urol 145(4):695–698PubMed
11.
go back to reference Sampaio FJB, Aragao AHM (1992) Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 147:322–328PubMed Sampaio FJB, Aragao AHM (1992) Inferior pole collecting system anatomy: its probable role in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 147:322–328PubMed
12.
go back to reference Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM et al (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682PubMedCrossRef Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM et al (1998) Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 159:676–682PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ather HM, Noor MA (2003) Does size and site matter for renal stones up to 30 mm-in size in children treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy? Urology 61:212–215PubMedCrossRef Ather HM, Noor MA (2003) Does size and site matter for renal stones up to 30 mm-in size in children treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy? Urology 61:212–215PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Demirkesen O, Onal B, Tansu N, Altınbaş R, Yalçın V, Öner A (2006) Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations. Urology 67:170–175PubMedCrossRef Demirkesen O, Onal B, Tansu N, Altınbaş R, Yalçın V, Öner A (2006) Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations. Urology 67:170–175PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Sarilar O, Binbay M, Altunrende F, Ozkuvancı U (2003) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract stones in children: a large scale retrospective analysis. J Urol 170(6 Pt 1):2405–2408PubMedCrossRef Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Sarilar O, Binbay M, Altunrende F, Ozkuvancı U (2003) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract stones in children: a large scale retrospective analysis. J Urol 170(6 Pt 1):2405–2408PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tan MO, Karaoglan U, Sen I, Deniz N, Bozkırlı I (2003) The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients. Eur Urol 43:188–193CrossRef Tan MO, Karaoglan U, Sen I, Deniz N, Bozkırlı I (2003) The impact of radiological anatomy in clearance of lower calyceal stones after shock wave lithotripsy in paediatric patients. Eur Urol 43:188–193CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Onal B, Demirkesen O, Tansu N, Kalkan M, Altıntas R, Yalcın V (2004) The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for paediatric lower pole stones. J Urol 172:1082–1086PubMedCrossRef Onal B, Demirkesen O, Tansu N, Kalkan M, Altıntas R, Yalcın V (2004) The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for paediatric lower pole stones. J Urol 172:1082–1086PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kupeli B, Tunc L, Acar C et al (2006) The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomical variation between the stone-bearing and normal contralateral kidney on stone formation in adult patients with lower caliceal stones. Int Braz J Urol 32:287–292PubMedCrossRef Kupeli B, Tunc L, Acar C et al (2006) The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomical variation between the stone-bearing and normal contralateral kidney on stone formation in adult patients with lower caliceal stones. Int Braz J Urol 32:287–292PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gurocak S, Kupeli B, Acar C, Guneri C, Tan MO, Bozkırlı I (2006) Pelvicaliceal anatomical variation between stone-bearing and normal contralateral kidneys: does it have an impact on stone formation in pediatric patients with a solitary lower caliceal stone? J Urol 175 (1): 270–275; discussion 275 Gurocak S, Kupeli B, Acar C, Guneri C, Tan MO, Bozkırlı I (2006) Pelvicaliceal anatomical variation between stone-bearing and normal contralateral kidneys: does it have an impact on stone formation in pediatric patients with a solitary lower caliceal stone? J Urol 175 (1): 270–275; discussion 275
20.
go back to reference Danuser H, Ackermann DK, Bohlen D, Struder UE (1998) Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol 159(1):56–61PubMedCrossRef Danuser H, Ackermann DK, Bohlen D, Struder UE (1998) Endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: risk factors determine the success rate. J Urol 159(1):56–61PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ghoneim IA, Ziada AM, Elkatib SE (2005) Predictive factors of lower caliceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy. Eur Urol 48:296–302PubMedCrossRef Ghoneim IA, Ziada AM, Elkatib SE (2005) Predictive factors of lower caliceal stone clearance after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy. Eur Urol 48:296–302PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fong YK, Peh SO, Ho SH, Ng FC, Quek PL, Ng KK (2004) Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy? Int J Urol 11(9):700–703PubMedCrossRef Fong YK, Peh SO, Ho SH, Ng FC, Quek PL, Ng KK (2004) Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy? Int J Urol 11(9):700–703PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E (2001) Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol 165:1415–1418PubMedCrossRef Madbouly K, Sheir KZ, Elsobky E (2001) Impact of lower pole renal anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy: fact or fiction? J Urol 165:1415–1418PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Keeley FX Jr, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA (1999) Clearance of lower pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle. Eur Urol 36:371–375PubMedCrossRef Keeley FX Jr, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA (1999) Clearance of lower pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle. Eur Urol 36:371–375PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gupta NP, Singh DV, Hemal AK, Mandal S (2000) Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 163:24–27PubMedCrossRef Gupta NP, Singh DV, Hemal AK, Mandal S (2000) Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior calculi with shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 163:24–27PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Knoll T, Musial A, Trojan L (2003) Measurement of renal anatomy for prediction of lower pole caliceal stone clearance: reproducibility of different parameters. J Endourol 17:447–451PubMedCrossRef Knoll T, Musial A, Trojan L (2003) Measurement of renal anatomy for prediction of lower pole caliceal stone clearance: reproducibility of different parameters. J Endourol 17:447–451PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV (2001) Lower pole 1: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166:2072–2080PubMedCrossRef Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV (2001) Lower pole 1: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166:2072–2080PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Gofrit ON, Pode D, Meretyk S et al (2001) Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm? J Urol 166(5):1862–1864PubMedCrossRef Gofrit ON, Pode D, Meretyk S et al (2001) Is the pediatric ureter as efficient as the adult ureter in transporting fragments following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi larger than 10 mm? J Urol 166(5):1862–1864PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lottman HB, Archambaud TF, Mercier-Paageyral B (2001) Monotherapy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of staghorn in children. J Urol 165:2324–2327CrossRef Lottman HB, Archambaud TF, Mercier-Paageyral B (2001) Monotherapy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of staghorn in children. J Urol 165:2324–2327CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jayanti VR, Arnold PM, Koff SA (2001) Strategies for managing upper tract calculi in young children. J Urol 165:2324–2327CrossRef Jayanti VR, Arnold PM, Koff SA (2001) Strategies for managing upper tract calculi in young children. J Urol 165:2324–2327CrossRef
31.
Metadata
Title
The impact of pelvicaliceal features on problematic lower pole stone clearance in different age groups
Authors
Serhat Gurocak
Bora Kupeli
Cenk Acar
Mustafa Ozgur Tan
Ustunol Karaoglan
Ibrahim Bozkirli
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-007-9220-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

International Urology and Nephrology 1/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine