Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2008

01-08-2008

Impact of preemptive warfarin dose reduction on anticoagulation after initiation of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin

Authors: Abrar Ahmed, John C. Stephens, Carol A. Kaus, William P. Fay

Published in: Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Antibiotics can potentiate warfarin anticoagulation. While preemptive warfarin dose reduction (DR) upon initiation of antibiotics has been advocated by experts, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of this strategy vs. the conventional strategy of not changing warfarin dose and carefully following international normalized ratio (INR) results. Methods and Results We compared the efficacy of preemptive 10–20% DR vs. no change in warfarin dosing in 40 chronically anticoagulated patients initiating trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) or levofloxacin. Eighteen patients received preemptive warfarin DR and 22 control patients underwent no change in warfarin dosing. There was no difference between the DR and control groups in the mean INR before beginning antibiotic therapy (2.53 ± 0.12 vs. 2.52 ± 0.11; P > 0.9). Mean interval between initiation of antibiotic and next INR was 5.1 ± 0.4 vs. 4.7 ± 0.5 days for DR vs. control patients, respectively (P > 0.5). For both TMP-SMX and levofloxacin, patients managed with a preemptive warfarin DR strategy did not exhibit a statistically significant change in the INR after initiating antibiotic therapy. In contrast, for each antibiotic, control group patients exhibited a significant increase in mean post-antibiotic INR compared to mean pre-antibiotic INR, though the effect was more pronounced in patients treated with TMP-SMX than with levofloxacin. Of DR group patients who were treated with TMP-SMX, none (0/8) developed a subtherapeutic INR, while 40% (4/10) of levofloxacin-treated patients developed a sub-therapeutic INR. Supra-therapeutic INR results led to transient interruption of warfarin dosing in 2 patients (11%) in the DR group vs. 12 patients (55%) in the control group (P = 0.007). Conclusions Prophylactic warfarin DR of 10–20% is effective in maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation in patients initiating TMP-SMX. An expectant strategy consisting of no change in warfarin dosing with short-term INR follow-up appears reasonable in patients treated with levofloxacin.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hirsh J, Fuster V, Ansell J, Halperin JL (2003) American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1633–1652PubMedCrossRef Hirsh J, Fuster V, Ansell J, Halperin JL (2003) American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Foundation guide to warfarin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 41:1633–1652PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Horton JD, Bushwick BM (1999) Warfarin therapy: evolving strategies in anticoagulation. Am Fam Phys 59:635–646 Horton JD, Bushwick BM (1999) Warfarin therapy: evolving strategies in anticoagulation. Am Fam Phys 59:635–646
3.
go back to reference Whitlon DS, Sadowski JA, Suttie JW (1978) Mechanisms of coumarin action: significance of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibition. Biochemistry 17:1371–1377PubMedCrossRef Whitlon DS, Sadowski JA, Suttie JW (1978) Mechanisms of coumarin action: significance of vitamin K epoxide reductase inhibition. Biochemistry 17:1371–1377PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Breckenridge A (1978) Oral anticoagulant drugs: pharmacokinetic aspects. Semin Hematol 15:19–26PubMed Breckenridge A (1978) Oral anticoagulant drugs: pharmacokinetic aspects. Semin Hematol 15:19–26PubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Kelly JG, O’Malley K (1979) Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulants. Clin Pharmacokinet 4:1–15PubMedCrossRef Kelly JG, O’Malley K (1979) Clinical pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulants. Clin Pharmacokinet 4:1–15PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Visser LE, Penning-van Bees FJ (2002) Overanticoagulation associated with combined use of antibacterial drugs and acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost 88:705–710PubMed Visser LE, Penning-van Bees FJ (2002) Overanticoagulation associated with combined use of antibacterial drugs and acenocoumarol or phenprocoumon anticoagulants. Thromb Haemost 88:705–710PubMed
8.
go back to reference Baglin T (2002) Avoiding overanticoagulation: knowing your antibiotic. Thromb Haemost 88:703–704PubMed Baglin T (2002) Avoiding overanticoagulation: knowing your antibiotic. Thromb Haemost 88:703–704PubMed
9.
go back to reference Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2005) The risk of overanticoagulation with antibiotic use in outpatients on stable warfarin regimens. J Gen Intern Med 20:653–656PubMedCrossRef Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2005) The risk of overanticoagulation with antibiotic use in outpatients on stable warfarin regimens. J Gen Intern Med 20:653–656PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference McCall KL, Scott JC, Anderson HG (2005) Retrospective evaluation of a possible interaction between warfarin and levofloxacin. Pharmacotherapy 25:67–73PubMedCrossRef McCall KL, Scott JC, Anderson HG (2005) Retrospective evaluation of a possible interaction between warfarin and levofloxacin. Pharmacotherapy 25:67–73PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:1079–1080, discussion 1080PubMedCrossRef Glasheen JJ, Fugit RV, Prochazka AV (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:1079–1080, discussion 1080PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yamreudeewong W, Lower DL, Kilpatrick DM, Enlow AM, Burrows MM, Greenwood MC (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:333–338PubMedCrossRef Yamreudeewong W, Lower DL, Kilpatrick DM, Enlow AM, Burrows MM, Greenwood MC (2003) Effect of levofloxacin coadministration on the international normalized ratios during warfarin therapy. Pharmacotherapy 23:333–338PubMedCrossRef
13.
14.
15.
Metadata
Title
Impact of preemptive warfarin dose reduction on anticoagulation after initiation of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin
Authors
Abrar Ahmed
John C. Stephens
Carol A. Kaus
William P. Fay
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0929-5305
Electronic ISSN: 1573-742X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-007-0164-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 1/2008 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine