Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 9/2020

Open Access 01-09-2020

Does the single-item self-rated health measure the same thing across different wordings? Construct validity study

Authors: Stéphane Cullati, Naike Bochatay, Clémentine Rossier, Idris Guessous, Claudine Burton-Jeangros, Delphine S. Courvoisier

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 9/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The self-rated health (SRH) item is frequently used in health surveys but variations of its form (wording, response options) may hinder comparisons between versions over time or across surveys. The objectives were to determine (a) whether three SRH forms are equivalent, (b) the form with the best construct validity and (c) the best coding scheme to maximize equivalence across forms.

Methods

We used data from 58,023 respondents of the Swiss Health Survey. Three SRH forms were used. Response options varied across forms and we explored four coding schemes (two considering SRH as continuous, two as dichotomous). Construct validity of the SRH was assessed using 34 health predictors to estimate the explained variance.

Results

Distributions of response options were similar across SRH forms, except for the “good” and “very good” options (“good” in form 1: 58.6%, form 2: 65.0% and form 3: 44.1%). Explained variances differed across SRH forms, with form 3 providing the best overall explained variance, regardless of coding schemes. The linear coding scheme maximised the equivalence across SRH forms.

Conclusion

The three SRH forms were not equivalent in terms of construct validity. Studies examining the evolution of SRH over time with surveys using different forms should use the linear coding scheme to maximise equivalence between SRH forms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.PubMedCrossRef Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997). Self-rated health and mortality: A review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38(1), 21–37.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hernández-Quevedo, C., Jones, A. M., & Rice, N. (2005). Reporting bias and heterogeneity in self-assessed health. Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. The University of York, Health, Econometrics and Data Group Working Paper 05/04. Hernández-Quevedo, C., Jones, A. M., & Rice, N. (2005). Reporting bias and heterogeneity in self-assessed health. Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. The University of York, Health, Econometrics and Data Group Working Paper 05/04.
23.
go back to reference Manderbacka, K. (1998). Examining what self-rated health question is understood to mean by respondents. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 26(2), 145–153.PubMedCrossRef Manderbacka, K. (1998). Examining what self-rated health question is understood to mean by respondents. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't]. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 26(2), 145–153.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference WHO (1946). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html. Accessed Sep 01, 2007. WHO (1946). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved from http://​www.​who.​int/​about/​definition/​en/​print.​html.​ Accessed Sep 01, 2007.
30.
go back to reference Della Bella, S., Lucchini, M., & Assi, J. (2012). Health inequality across time: A growth curve analysis of self assessed health in contemporary Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 32(2), 291–309. Della Bella, S., Lucchini, M., & Assi, J. (2012). Health inequality across time: A growth curve analysis of self assessed health in contemporary Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 32(2), 291–309.
31.
go back to reference Benyamini, Y., Leventhal, E. A., & Leventhal, H. (2000). Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(3), 354–364.PubMedCrossRef Benyamini, Y., Leventhal, E. A., & Leventhal, H. (2000). Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health. Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(3), 354–364.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Maddox, G. L., & Douglass, E. B. (1973). Self-assessment of health: A longitudinal study of elderly subjects. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 14(1), 87–93.PubMedCrossRef Maddox, G. L., & Douglass, E. B. (1973). Self-assessment of health: A longitudinal study of elderly subjects. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 14(1), 87–93.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Shields, M., & Shooshtari, S. (2001). Determinants of self-perceived health. Health Reports, 13(1), 35–52.PubMed Shields, M., & Shooshtari, S. (2001). Determinants of self-perceived health. Health Reports, 13(1), 35–52.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Krause, N. M., & Jay, G. M. (1994). What do global self-rated health items measure? Medical Care, 32(9), 930–942.PubMedCrossRef Krause, N. M., & Jay, G. M. (1994). What do global self-rated health items measure? Medical Care, 32(9), 930–942.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does the single-item self-rated health measure the same thing across different wordings? Construct validity study
Authors
Stéphane Cullati
Naike Bochatay
Clémentine Rossier
Idris Guessous
Claudine Burton-Jeangros
Delphine S. Courvoisier
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02533-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2020

Quality of Life Research 9/2020 Go to the issue