Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 2/2020

Open Access 01-02-2020 | Mood Disorders

Capturing the patient voice: implementing patient-reported outcomes across the health system

Authors: Elizabeth Austin, Cynthia LeRouge, Andrea L. Hartzler, Courtney Segal, Danielle C. Lavallee

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Supporting the capture and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at the point-of-care enriches information about important clinical and quality of life outcomes. Yet the ability to scale PROs across healthcare systems has been limited by knowledge gaps around how to manage the diversity of PRO uses and leverage health information technology. In this study, we report learnings and practice insights from UW Medicine’s practice transformation efforts to incorporate patient voice into multiple areas of care.

Methods

Using a participatory, action research approach, we engaged with UW Medicine clinical and administrative stakeholders experienced with PRO implementation to inventory PRO implementations across the health system, characterize common clinical uses for PROs, and develop recommendations for system-wide governance and implementation of PROs.

Results

We identified a wide breadth of PRO implementations (n = 14) in practice and found that nearly half (47%) of employed PRO measures captured shared clinical domains (e.g., depression). We developed three vignettes (use cases) that illustrate how users interact with PROs, characterize common ways PRO implementations support clinical care across the health system (1) Preventive care, (2) Chronic/Specialty care, and (3) Surgical/Interventional care), and elucidate opportunities to enhance efficient PRO implementations through system-level standards and governance.

Conclusions

Practice transformation efforts increasingly require integration of the patient voice into clinical care, often through the use of PROs. Learnings from our work highlight the importance of proactively considering how PROs will be used across the layers of healthcare organizations to optimize the design and governance of PROs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care. The Annals of Family Medicine,9(2), 100–103.CrossRef Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care. The Annals of Family Medicine,9(2), 100–103.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Wu, A. W., Miller, R. S., Jensen, R. E., Bantug, E. T., & Wolff, A. C. (2011). The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care. Cancer Journal,17(4), 211–218.CrossRef Snyder, C. F., Wu, A. W., Miller, R. S., Jensen, R. E., Bantug, E. T., & Wolff, A. C. (2011). The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care. Cancer Journal,17(4), 211–218.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2019). Promoting interoperability. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2019). Promoting interoperability.
7.
go back to reference Basch, E. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. New England Journal of Medicine,376(2), 105–108.CrossRef Basch, E. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. New England Journal of Medicine,376(2), 105–108.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gerhardt, W. E., et al. (2018). Systemwide implementation of patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care at a children’s hospital. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety,44(8), 441–453.CrossRef Gerhardt, W. E., et al. (2018). Systemwide implementation of patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical care at a children’s hospital. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety,44(8), 441–453.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Baumhauer, J. F. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—are they living up to their potential? New England Journal of Medicine,377(1), 6–9.CrossRef Baumhauer, J. F. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes—are they living up to their potential? New England Journal of Medicine,377(1), 6–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jensen, R. E., et al. (2015). The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care. Medical Care,53(2), 153–159.CrossRef Jensen, R. E., et al. (2015). The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care. Medical Care,53(2), 153–159.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Greene, S. M., Reid, R. J., & Larson, E. B. (2012). Implementing the learning health system: From concept to action. Annals of Internal Medicine,157(3), 207–210.CrossRef Greene, S. M., Reid, R. J., & Larson, E. B. (2012). Implementing the learning health system: From concept to action. Annals of Internal Medicine,157(3), 207–210.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gensheimer, S. G., Wu, A. W., Snyder, C. F., & PRO-EHR Users’ Guide Steering Group, and PRO-EHR Users’ Guide Working Group. (2018). Oh, the places we’ll go: Patient-reported outcomes and electronic health records. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research,11(6), 591–598.CrossRef Gensheimer, S. G., Wu, A. W., Snyder, C. F., & PRO-EHR Users’ Guide Steering Group, and PRO-EHR Users’ Guide Working Group. (2018). Oh, the places we’ll go: Patient-reported outcomes and electronic health records. The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research,11(6), 591–598.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Arroll, B., et al. (2010). Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. The Annals of Family Medicine,8(4), 348–353.CrossRef Arroll, B., et al. (2010). Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. The Annals of Family Medicine,8(4), 348–353.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hartzler, A. L., Chaudhuri, S., Fey, B. C., Flum, D. R., & Lavallee, D. (2015). Integrating patient-reported outcomes into spine surgical care through visual dashboards: Lessons learned from human-centered design. eGEMs,3(2), 1133.CrossRef Hartzler, A. L., Chaudhuri, S., Fey, B. C., Flum, D. R., & Lavallee, D. (2015). Integrating patient-reported outcomes into spine surgical care through visual dashboards: Lessons learned from human-centered design. eGEMs,3(2), 1133.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Crane, H. M., et al. (2016). A randomized controlled trial protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated care management approach to improve adherence among HIV-infected patients in routine clinical care: Rationale and design. JMIR Research Protocols,5(4), e156.CrossRef Crane, H. M., et al. (2016). A randomized controlled trial protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of an integrated care management approach to improve adherence among HIV-infected patients in routine clinical care: Rationale and design. JMIR Research Protocols,5(4), e156.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Berry, D. L., et al. (2014). Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: Results of a multicenter randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology,32(3), 199–205.CrossRef Berry, D. L., et al. (2014). Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: Results of a multicenter randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology,32(3), 199–205.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chute, C. G., Beck, S. A., Fisk, T. B., & Mohr, D. N. (2010). The enterprise data trust at Mayo Clinic: A semantically integrated warehouse of biomedical data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,17(2), 131–135.CrossRef Chute, C. G., Beck, S. A., Fisk, T. B., & Mohr, D. N. (2010). The enterprise data trust at Mayo Clinic: A semantically integrated warehouse of biomedical data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association,17(2), 131–135.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,126, 3–13.CrossRef Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,126, 3–13.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hsiao, C.-J., Dymek, C., Kim, B., & Russell, B. (2019). Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: Understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology. Quality of Life Research,28(6), 1575–1583.CrossRef Hsiao, C.-J., Dymek, C., Kim, B., & Russell, B. (2019). Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: Understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology. Quality of Life Research,28(6), 1575–1583.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sharp, A., & McDermott, P. (2009). Workflow modeling: Tools for process improvement and applications development—Alec Sharp, Patrick McDermott (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Artech House. Sharp, A., & McDermott, P. (2009). Workflow modeling: Tools for process improvement and applications development—Alec Sharp, Patrick McDermott (2nd ed.). Norwood, MA: Artech House.
24.
go back to reference Maiden, N., & Robertson, S. (2005). Developing use cases and scenarios in the requirements process. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering—ICSE’05 (p. 561). Maiden, N., & Robertson, S. (2005). Developing use cases and scenarios in the requirements process. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software EngineeringICSE’05 (p. 561).
26.
go back to reference Koshy, E., & Waterman, H. (2011). Action Research in Healthcare. Los Angeles: SAGE.CrossRef Koshy, E., & Waterman, H. (2011). Action Research in Healthcare. Los Angeles: SAGE.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology,11(3), 235–246.CrossRef Baskerville, R. L., & Wood-Harper, A. T. (1996). A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. Journal of Information Technology,11(3), 235–246.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cordeiro, L., & Soares, C. B. (2018). Action research in the healthcare field. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports,16(4), 1003–1047.CrossRef Cordeiro, L., & Soares, C. B. (2018). Action research in the healthcare field. JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports,16(4), 1003–1047.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Braithwaite, J., et al. (2007). An action research protocol to strengthen system-wide inter-professional learning and practice. BMC Health Services Research,7(1), 144.CrossRef Braithwaite, J., et al. (2007). An action research protocol to strengthen system-wide inter-professional learning and practice. BMC Health Services Research,7(1), 144.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Stringer, E., & Genat, B. (2004). Action research in health. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education. Stringer, E., & Genat, B. (2004). Action research in health. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
31.
go back to reference Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care,19(3), 68–74.CrossRef Sittig, D. F., & Singh, H. (2010). A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Quality and Safety in Health Care,19(3), 68–74.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2004). Snowball sampling. In The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Atkinson, R. & Flint, J. (2004). Snowball sampling. In The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods.
33.
go back to reference Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRef Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Holloway, I. (2008). A-Z of qualitative research in healthcare. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Holloway, I. (2008). A-Z of qualitative research in healthcare. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
35.
go back to reference Clarke, J. L., Skoufalos, A., Medalia, A., & Fendrick, A. M. (2016). Improving health outcomes for patients with depression: A population health imperative. Report on an expert panel meeting. Population Health Management,19(Suppl 2), 1–12. Clarke, J. L., Skoufalos, A., Medalia, A., & Fendrick, A. M. (2016). Improving health outcomes for patients with depression: A population health imperative. Report on an expert panel meeting. Population Health Management,19(Suppl 2), 1–12.
36.
go back to reference Wu, A. W., Kharrazi, H., Boulware, L. E., & Snyder, C. F. (2013). Measure once, cut twice—adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,66(8), S12–S20.CrossRef Wu, A. W., Kharrazi, H., Boulware, L. E., & Snyder, C. F. (2013). Measure once, cut twice—adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,66(8), S12–S20.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sondheim, S. E., et al. (2017). Governance practices in an era of healthcare transformation. Journal of Healthcare Management,62(5), 316–326.CrossRef Sondheim, S. E., et al. (2017). Governance practices in an era of healthcare transformation. Journal of Healthcare Management,62(5), 316–326.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Biber, J., et al. (2018). Patient reported outcomes—experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes,2(1), 34.CrossRef Biber, J., et al. (2018). Patient reported outcomes—experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes,2(1), 34.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Papuga, M. O., Dasilva, C., McIntyre, A., Mitten, D., Kates, S., & Baumhauer, J. F. (2018). Large-scale clinical implementation of PROMIS computer adaptive testing with direct incorporation into the electronic medical record. Health Systems,7(1), 1–12.CrossRef Papuga, M. O., Dasilva, C., McIntyre, A., Mitten, D., Kates, S., & Baumhauer, J. F. (2018). Large-scale clinical implementation of PROMIS computer adaptive testing with direct incorporation into the electronic medical record. Health Systems,7(1), 1–12.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Sorondo, B., et al. (2016). Using a patient portal to transmit patient reported health information into the electronic record: Workflow implications and user experience. eGEMs,4(3), 7.CrossRef Sorondo, B., et al. (2016). Using a patient portal to transmit patient reported health information into the electronic record: Workflow implications and user experience. eGEMs,4(3), 7.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Aaronson, N. et al. (2011). User’s guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. International Society for Quality of Life Research. Aaronson, N. et al. (2011). User’s guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. International Society for Quality of Life Research.
43.
go back to reference Zhang, R., et al. (2019). Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open,2(1), 73–80.CrossRef Zhang, R., et al. (2019). Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open,2(1), 73–80.CrossRef
45.
46.
go back to reference Unützer, J., et al. (2012). Quality improvement with pay-for-performance incentives in integrated behavioral health care. American Journal of Public Health,102(6), e41–e45.CrossRef Unützer, J., et al. (2012). Quality improvement with pay-for-performance incentives in integrated behavioral health care. American Journal of Public Health,102(6), e41–e45.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2016). Measure #134 (NQF 0418): Preventive care and screening: Screening for depression and follow-up plan-national quality strategy domain: Community/population health 2017. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2016). Measure #134 (NQF 0418): Preventive care and screening: Screening for depression and follow-up plan-national quality strategy domain: Community/population health 2017.
Metadata
Title
Capturing the patient voice: implementing patient-reported outcomes across the health system
Authors
Elizabeth Austin
Cynthia LeRouge
Andrea L. Hartzler
Courtney Segal
Danielle C. Lavallee
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02320-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Quality of Life Research 2/2020 Go to the issue