Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Spinal Surgery | Responses to "Advancing quality‑of‑life research by deepening our understanding of response shift" by Bruce D. Rapkin & Carolyn E. Schwartz

Measurement of appraisal is a valuable adjunct to the current spine outcome tools: a clinician’s perspective on the Rapkin and Schwartz commentary

Author: Joel A. Finkelstein

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

I have read with interest the commentary by Bruce Rapkin and Carolyn Schwartz, “Advancing quality-of-life research by deepening our understanding of response shift: A unifying theory of appraisal” [1]. These authors have identified the teleological assumption that there can be no quality-of-life (QOL) measurement and no patient-reported outcomes without some sort of cognitive appraisal going on. The QOL Appraisal Model by Rapkin and Schwartz [2] has built on the original foundational model of Sprangers and Schwartz [3] and enables the researcher to account for a mechanism of response shift at the individual level. The hard work now begins and putting a box around this abstraction with scientific rigor is the achievement I feel this commentary has outlined. I will speak to this from my area of clinical practice as a spine surgeon. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2004). Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2004). Toward a theoretical model of quality-of-life appraisal: Implications of findings from studies of response shift. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2(1), 14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed Sprangers, M. A. G., & Schwartz, C. E. (1999). Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science and Medicine, 48(11), 1507–1515.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schwartz, C. E., Ayandeh, A., & Finkelstein, J. A. (2015). When patients and surgeons disagree about surgical outcome: Investigating patient factors and chart note communication. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schwartz, C. E., Ayandeh, A., & Finkelstein, J. A. (2015). When patients and surgeons disagree about surgical outcome: Investigating patient factors and chart note communication. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13(1), 161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Measurement of appraisal is a valuable adjunct to the current spine outcome tools: a clinician’s perspective on the Rapkin and Schwartz commentary
Author
Joel A. Finkelstein
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Spinal Surgery
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02275-w

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Quality of Life Research 10/2019 Go to the issue