Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Quality of Life Research
Published in: Quality of Life Research 12/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Review

Reporting and dealing with missing quality of life data in RCTs: has the picture changed in the last decade?

Authors: S. Fielding, A. Ogbuagu, S. Sivasubramaniam, G. MacLennan, C. R. Ramsay

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Missing data are a major problem in the analysis of data from randomised trials affecting power and potentially producing biased treatment effects. Specifically focussing on quality of life outcomes, we aimed to report the amount of missing data, whether imputation was used and what methods and was the missing mechanism discussed from four leading medical journals and compare the picture to our previous review nearly a decade ago.

Methods

A random selection (50 %) of all RCTS published during 2013–2014 in BMJ, JAMA, Lancet and NEJM was obtained. RCTs reported in research letters, cluster RCTs, non-randomised designs, review articles and meta-analysis were excluded.

Results

We included 87 RCTs in the review of which 35 % the amount of missing primary QoL data was unclear, 31 (36 %) used imputation. Only 23 % discussed the missing data mechanism. Nearly half used complete case analysis. Reporting was more unclear for secondary QoL outcomes. Compared to the previous review, multiple imputation was used more prominently but mainly in sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

Inadequate reporting and handling of missing QoL data in RCTs are still an issue. There is a large gap between statistical methods research relating to missing data and the use of the methods in applications. A sensitivity analysis should be undertaken to explore the sensitivity of the main results to different missing data assumptions. Medical journals can help to improve the situation by requiring higher standards of reporting and analytical methods to deal with missing data, and by issuing guidance to authors on expected standard.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Fielding, S., Maclennan, G., Cook, J. A., et al. (2008). A review of RCTs in four medical journals to assess the use of imputation to overcome missing data in quality of life outcomes. Trials, 9, 1.CrossRef
2.
Wood, A. M., White, I. R., & Thompson, S. G. (2004). Are missing outcome data adequately handled? A review of published randomized controlled trials in major medical journals. Clinical Trials, 1(4), 368–376.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bell, M. L., Fiero, M., Horton, N. J., & Hsu, C. (2014). Handling missing data in RCTs: A review of the top medical journals. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Carpenter, J. R., & Kenward, M. G. (2008). Missing data in randomised controlled trials—a practical guide. Birmingham: National Institute for Health Research.
5.
White, I. R., Horton, N. J., Carpenter, J., & Pocock, S. J. (2011). Strategy for intention to treat analysis in randomised trials with missing outcome data. BMJ, 342, d40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
7.
Fielding, S., Fayers, P. M., & Ramsay, C. R. (2009). Investigating the missing data mechanism in quality of life outcomes: A comparison of approaches. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 7, 57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
9.
Fairclough, D. L. (2002). Design and analysis of quality of life studies in clinical trials. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
10.
Little, R. J. A. (1994). A class pf pattern-mixture models for normal incomplete data. Biometrika, 81, 471–483.CrossRef
11.
Thabane, L., Mbuagbaw, L., Zhang, S., Samaan, Z., Marcucci, M., Ye, C., et al. (2013). A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: The what, why, when and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Sterne, J. A. C., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G., et al. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338, b2393.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & CONSORT. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 1, 2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Altman, D. G., Revicki, D. A., Moher, D., Brundage, M. D., et al. (2013). Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomised trials: The CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA, 309(8), 814–821.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. (2010). Guideline on missing data in confirmatory clinical trials. London: European Medicines Agency.
Metadata
Title
Reporting and dealing with missing quality of life data in RCTs: has the picture changed in the last decade?
Authors
S. Fielding
A. Ogbuagu
S. Sivasubramaniam
G. MacLennan
C. R. Ramsay
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1411-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Quality of Life Research 12/2016 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Quality-of-life assessment in dementia: the use of DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy total scores

Review

A systematic review of measurement properties of the instruments measuring health-related quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome

OriginalPaper

The impact of a belief in life after death on health-state preferences: True difference or artifact?

OriginalPaper

Interpretation of verbal descriptors for response options commonly used in verbal rating scales in patient-reported outcome instruments

OriginalPaper

Anthropometric measures change and quality of life in elderly people: a longitudinal population-based study in Southern Brazil

OriginalPaper

Ten-year follow-up of health-related quality of life among ambulatory persons with multiple sclerosis at baseline