Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality of Life Research 8/2011

Open Access 01-10-2011

Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway

Authors: Jocelyne Clench-Aas, Ragnhild Bang Nes, Odd Steffen Dalgard, Leif Edvard Aarø

Published in: Quality of Life Research | Issue 8/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Results from previous studies examining the dimensionality and factorial invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) are inconsistent and often based on small samples. This study examines the factorial structure and factorial invariance of the SWLS in a Norwegian sample.

Methods

Confirmatory factor analysis (AMOS) was conducted to explore dimensionality and test for measurement invariance in factor structure, factor loadings, intercepts, and residual variance across gender and four age groups in a large (N = 4,984), nationally representative sample of Norwegian men and women (15–79 years).

Results

The data supported a modified unidimensional structure. Factor loadings could be constrained to equality between the sexes, indicating metric invariance between genders. Further testing indicated invariance also at the strong and strict levels, thus allowing analyses involving group means. The SWLS was shown to be sensitive to age, however, at the strong and strict levels of invariance testing.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results in this Norwegian study seem to confirm that a unidimensional structure is acceptable, but that a modified single-factor model with correlations between error terms of items 4 and 5 is preferred. Additionally, comparisons may be made between the genders. Caution must be exerted when comparing age groups.
Footnotes
1
Detailed results of the analyses of these two models and the model for inter-item correlation is available from the corresponding author.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRef Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 37–69.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedCrossRef Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.PubMedCrossRef Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 149–161.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434.PubMedCrossRef Fujita, F., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 427–434.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1039–1056.PubMedCrossRef Lucas, R. E., & Fujita, F. (2000). Factors influencing the relation between extraversion and pleasant affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 1039–1056.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stubbe, J. H., Posthuma, D., Boomsma, D. I., & De Geus, E. J. (2005). Heritability of life satisfaction in adults: A twin-family study. Psychological Medicine, 35(11), 1581–1588.PubMedCrossRef Stubbe, J. H., Posthuma, D., Boomsma, D. I., & De Geus, E. J. (2005). Heritability of life satisfaction in adults: A twin-family study. Psychological Medicine, 35(11), 1581–1588.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.PubMedCrossRef Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616–628.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRef Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew language version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 96, 267–274.CrossRef Anaby, D., Jarus, T., & Zumbo, B. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Hebrew language version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 96, 267–274.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 815–826.CrossRef Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 healthy young adults in The Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 815–826.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Balatsky, G., & Diener, E. (1993). A comparison of the well-being of Soviet and American students. Social Indicators Research, 28, 225–243.CrossRef Balatsky, G., & Diener, E. (1993). A comparison of the well-being of Soviet and American students. Social Indicators Research, 28, 225–243.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Smekal, V., & Dorahy, M. J. (1999). Factor structure and reliability of a Czech translation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Czech university students. Studia Psychologica, 41, 239–244. Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Smekal, V., & Dorahy, M. J. (1999). Factor structure and reliability of a Czech translation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Czech university students. Studia Psychologica, 41, 239–244.
13.
go back to reference Gouveia, V., Milfont, T., da Fonseca, P., & Coelho, J. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267–277.CrossRef Gouveia, V., Milfont, T., da Fonseca, P., & Coelho, J. (2009). Life satisfaction in Brazil: Testing the psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in five Brazilian samples. Social Indicators Research, 90, 267–277.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070–1079.CrossRef Hultell, D., & Gustavsson, J. P. (2008). A psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a Swedish nationwide sample of university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1070–1079.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 411–423.CrossRef Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: An IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 411–423.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 3, 137–152. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The Satisfaction with Life Scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology: Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice, 3, 137–152.
17.
go back to reference Slocum-Gori, S., Zumbo, B., Michalos, A., & Diener, E. (2009). A note on the dimensionality of quality of life scales: An illustration with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Social Indicators Research, 92, 489–496.CrossRef Slocum-Gori, S., Zumbo, B., Michalos, A., & Diener, E. (2009). A note on the dimensionality of quality of life scales: An illustration with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Social Indicators Research, 92, 489–496.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wu, Ch., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259–1268.CrossRef Wu, Ch., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259–1268.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sachs, J. (2003). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Hong Kong university students. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 225–234.CrossRef Sachs, J. (2003). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Hong Kong university students. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 46, 225–234.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
go back to reference Shevlin, M., Brunsden, V., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Satisfaction With Life Scale: analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 911–916.CrossRef Shevlin, M., Brunsden, V., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Satisfaction With Life Scale: analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 911–916.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Briere, N. M. (1989). L’echelle de satisfaction de vie: Validation Canadienne-Francaise du “Satisfaction With Life Scate” [French-Canadian validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale]. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 210–223.CrossRef Blais, M. R., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Briere, N. M. (1989). L’echelle de satisfaction de vie: Validation Canadienne-Francaise du “Satisfaction With Life Scate” [French-Canadian validation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale]. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 210–223.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Turkish university students, Correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9589-4. Durak, M., Senol-Durak, E., & Gencoz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale among Turkish university students, Correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.​1007/​s11205-010-9589-4.
24.
go back to reference Siedlecki, K. L., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Oishi, S., & Salthouse, T. A. (2008). Life satisfaction across adulthood: Different determinants at different ages? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 153–164.PubMedCrossRef Siedlecki, K. L., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Oishi, S., & Salthouse, T. A. (2008). Life satisfaction across adulthood: Different determinants at different ages? The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3, 153–164.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1255–1260.CrossRef Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1255–1260.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M. L. (2000). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 62–68.PubMed Pons, D., Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M. L. (2000). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance for adolescents and elderly persons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 62–68.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Tucker, K., Ozer, D., Lyubomirsky, S., & Boehm, J. (2006). Testing for measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale: A comparison of Russians and North Americans. Social Indicators Research, 78, 341–360.CrossRef Tucker, K., Ozer, D., Lyubomirsky, S., & Boehm, J. (2006). Testing for measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale: A comparison of Russians and North Americans. Social Indicators Research, 78, 341–360.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (2008). AMOS 17.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: SPSSinc. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (2008). AMOS 17.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: SPSSinc.
29.
go back to reference Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P., & Savalei, V. (2010). How many categories is enough to treat data as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under a range of non-ideal situations. Manuscript under review, pp. 1–51. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P., & Savalei, V. (2010). How many categories is enough to treat data as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under a range of non-ideal situations. Manuscript under review, pp. 1–51.
30.
go back to reference Bollen, K. (1989). Sructural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley. Bollen, K. (1989). Sructural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
31.
go back to reference Ory, D. T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). The impact of non-normality, sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling: Evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior. Quality & Quantity, 44, 427–445.CrossRef Ory, D. T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2010). The impact of non-normality, sample size and estimation technique on goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation modeling: Evidence from ten empirical models of travel behavior. Quality & Quantity, 44, 427–445.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks: Sage. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
33.
go back to reference Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS-basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis group, LLC. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS-basic concepts, applications and programming. New York, London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis group, LLC.
34.
go back to reference Vautier, S., Mullet, E., & Jmel, S. (2004). Assessing the structural robustness of self-rated Satisfaction With Life: A SEM analysis. Social Indicators Research, 68, 235–249.CrossRef Vautier, S., Mullet, E., & Jmel, S. (2004). Assessing the structural robustness of self-rated Satisfaction With Life: A SEM analysis. Social Indicators Research, 68, 235–249.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
36.
go back to reference Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of parital measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.CrossRef Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of parital measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press.
38.
go back to reference Vassar, M. (2008). A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction With Life Scale: An RG study. Social Indicators Research, 86, 47–57.CrossRef Vassar, M. (2008). A note on the score reliability for the Satisfaction With Life Scale: An RG study. Social Indicators Research, 86, 47–57.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199.PubMedCrossRef MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592.PubMedCrossRef Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay Satisfaction With Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 92, 25–33.CrossRef Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay Satisfaction With Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 92, 25–33.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67, 157–184. Oishi, S., Diener, E., Suh, E., & Lucas, R. E. (1999). Value as a moderator in subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 67, 157–184.
43.
go back to reference Ryff, C. D. (1989). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 195–201.PubMedCrossRef Ryff, C. D. (1989). In the eye of the beholder: Views of psychological well-being among middle-aged and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4, 195–201.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Westerhof, G. J., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Thissen, T. (2001). Beyond life satisfaction: Lay conceptions of well-being among middle-aged and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 56, 179–203.CrossRef Westerhof, G. J., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Thissen, T. (2001). Beyond life satisfaction: Lay conceptions of well-being among middle-aged and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 56, 179–203.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dimensionality and measurement invariance in the Satisfaction with Life Scale in Norway
Authors
Jocelyne Clench-Aas
Ragnhild Bang Nes
Odd Steffen Dalgard
Leif Edvard Aarø
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality of Life Research / Issue 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9859-x

Other articles of this Issue 8/2011

Quality of Life Research 8/2011 Go to the issue