Published in:
Open Access
01-09-2011 | Brief Communication
How useful are the SF-36 sub-scales in older people? Mokken scaling of data from the HALCyon programme
Authors:
Gita D. Mishra, Catharine R. Gale, Avan Aihie Sayer, Cyrus Cooper, Elaine M. Dennison, Lawrence J. Whalley, Leone Craig, Diana Kuh, Ian J. Deary, The HALCyon Study Team
Published in:
Quality of Life Research
|
Issue 7/2011
Login to get access
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate two psychometric properties of SF-36, namely unidimensionality and reliability.
Methods
The data are from three cohorts in the HALCyon collaborative research programme into healthy ageing: Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1936 (n = 428), Hertfordshire Ageing Study (n = 358) and Hertfordshire Cohort Study (n = 3,216). The Mokken scaling model was applied to each sub-scale of SF-36 to evaluate unidimensionality as indicated by scalability. The lower bound for internal consistency reliability was determined by Cronbach’s alpha.
Results
All six sub-scales of SF-36, with the exception of general health (GH) and mental health (MH), demonstrated strong scalability (0.5 ≤ H < 1). The results were consistent across all 3 cohorts. Both GH and MH showed medium scalability (0.4 ≤ H <0.55), although individual items ‘sick easier..’, ‘as healthy as..’ and ‘expect to get worse’ of the GH sub-scale and ‘nervous’, ‘happy’ in the MH sub-scale had low scalability (H < 0.4) in the oldest cohort (aged 73–83). Cronbach’s alphas for all sub-scales were between 0.70 and 0.92.
Conclusions
The unidimensionality and reliability of the sub-scales of SF-36 are sufficient to make this a useful measure of health-related quality of life in older people. Caution is needed when interpreting the results for GH and MH in the oldest cohort due to the poor unidimensionality.