Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Prevention Science 2/2013

01-04-2013

Meta-Analysis and Subgroups

Authors: Michael Borenstein, Julian P. T. Higgins

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Subgroup analysis is the process of comparing a treatment effect for two or more variants of an intervention—to ask, for example, if an intervention’s impact is affected by the setting (school versus community), by the delivery agent (outside facilitator versus regular classroom teacher), by the quality of delivery, or if the long-term effect differs from the short-term effect. While large-scale studies often employ subgroup analyses, these analyses cannot generally be performed for small-scale studies, since these typically include a homogeneous population and only one variant of the intervention. This limitation can be bypassed by using meta-analysis. Meta-analysis allows the researcher to compare the treatment effect in different subgroups, even if these subgroups appear in separate studies. We discuss several statistical issues related to this procedure, including the selection of a statistical model and statistical power for the comparison. To illustrate these points, we use the example of a meta-analysis of obesity prevention.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Bonett, D. G. (2008). Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations. Psychological Methods, 13, 173–189.PubMedCrossRef Bonett, D. G. (2008). Meta-analytic interval estimation for bivariate correlations. Psychological Methods, 13, 173–189.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bonett, D. G. (2009). Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences. Psychological Methods, 14, 225–238.PubMedCrossRef Bonett, D. G. (2009). Meta-analytic interval estimation for standardized and unstandardized mean differences. Psychological Methods, 14, 225–238.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
go back to reference Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 97–111.CrossRef Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 97–111.CrossRef
go back to reference Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Cooper, H. M., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
go back to reference Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic.
go back to reference Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2001). The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 6, 203–217.PubMedCrossRef Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2001). The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 6, 203–217.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 426–445.PubMedCrossRef Hedges, L. V., & Pigott, T. D. (2004). The power of statistical tests for moderators in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 426–445.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lindgarde, F. (2000). The effect of orlistat on body weight and coronary heart disease risk profile in obese patients: The Swedish Multimorbidity Study. Journal of Internal Medicine, 248, 245–254. Lindgarde, F. (2000). The effect of orlistat on body weight and coronary heart disease risk profile in obese patients: The Swedish Multimorbidity Study. Journal of Internal Medicine, 248, 245–254.
go back to reference Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Padwal, R., Li, S. K., & Lau, D. C. W. (2003a). Long-term pharmacotherapy for overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Obesity, 27, 1437–1446.CrossRef Padwal, R., Li, S. K., & Lau, D. C. W. (2003a). Long-term pharmacotherapy for overweight and obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Obesity, 27, 1437–1446.CrossRef
go back to reference Padwal, R. S., Rucker, D., Li, S. K., Curioni, C., Lau, D. C. W. (2003) Long-term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004094. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004094.pub2. Padwal, R. S., Rucker, D., Li, S. K., Curioni, C., Lau, D. C. W. (2003) Long-term pharmacotherapy for obesity and overweight. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004094. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD004094.​pub2.
go back to reference Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Metadata
Title
Meta-Analysis and Subgroups
Authors
Michael Borenstein
Julian P. T. Higgins
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Prevention Science / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0377-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Prevention Science 2/2013 Go to the issue