Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2014

01-10-2014 | Research Article

Prospective risk analysis and incident reporting for better pharmaceutical care at paediatric hospital discharge

Authors: Laure-Zoé Kaestli, Laurence Cingria, Caroline Fonzo-Christe, Pascal Bonnabry

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Discharging patients from hospital is a complex multidisciplinary process that can lead to non-compliance and medication-related problems. Objective To evaluate risks of discontinuity of pharmaceutical care at paediatric hospital discharge and assess potential improvement strategies, using two complementary methods: a prospective risk analysis and a spontaneous incident reporting system. Setting Geneva University hospitals and community pharmacies. Methods A multidisciplinary team analysed the paediatric medication discharge process applying the failure modes (FM), effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA), using ibuprofen, morphine, valganciclovir as model drugs. Over 46 months, incidents with discharge prescriptions, reported by community pharmacists, were classified according to FMECA’s FM. Main outcome measures FM, criticality indexes (CI), incidents. Results Twenty-four FM were identified. The highest criticality scores were given for prescribing the wrong dosage [mean criticality index (CI = 205)], early treatment discontinuation by the patient (CI = 195), and continuation of contraindicated treatment by the general practitioner (CI = 191). Implementation of eight improvement strategies covering the eight most critical FM led to a 64 % reduction in criticality scores (CI 496 vs 1,392). Improvement of the computerized-physician-order-entry system was the single most effective strategy (CI 843 vs 1,392). Only 52 incidents were spontaneously reported (17 for paediatric patients). Paediatric problems most frequently reported (lack of information, 35 %; delay in drug supply, 18 %) were consistent with the highest frequencies scored by FMECA. Conclusion Spontaneous incident reporting leads to high levels of under-reporting, but highlighted similar problems at paediatric hospital discharge to FMECA. Using FMECA allowed estimations of criticalities at each step and the potential impact of safety improvement strategies. Proactive and reactive methods proved complementary and would help to set up effective targeted improvement strategies to improve medication process at paediatric hospital discharge.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Halasyamani L, Kripalani S, Coleman E, et al. Transition of care for hospitalized elderly patients: development of a discharge checklist for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2006;1:354–60.PubMedCrossRef Halasyamani L, Kripalani S, Coleman E, et al. Transition of care for hospitalized elderly patients: development of a discharge checklist for hospitalists. J Hosp Med. 2006;1:354–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kripalani S, et al. Medication use among inner city patients after hospital discharge: patient reported barriers and solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:529–35.PubMedCrossRef Kripalani S, et al. Medication use among inner city patients after hospital discharge: patient reported barriers and solutions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:529–35.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Groene RO, Orrego C, Suñol R, et al. “It’s like two worlds apart”: an analysis of vulnerable patient handover practices at discharge from hospital. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:67–75.CrossRef Groene RO, Orrego C, Suñol R, et al. “It’s like two worlds apart”: an analysis of vulnerable patient handover practices at discharge from hospital. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:67–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Clarke C, Persaud D. Leading clinical handover improvement: a change strategy to implement best practices in the acute care setting. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:11–8.PubMedCrossRef Clarke C, Persaud D. Leading clinical handover improvement: a change strategy to implement best practices in the acute care setting. J Patient Saf. 2011;7:11–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jeffcott SA, Evans SM, Cameron PA, et al. Improving measurement in clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:272–7.PubMedCrossRef Jeffcott SA, Evans SM, Cameron PA, et al. Improving measurement in clinical handover. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:272–7.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kunac DL, Kennedy J, Austin N, et al. Incidence, preventability, and impact of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and potential ADEs in hospitalized children in New Zealand: a prospective observational cohort study. Paediatr Drugs. 2009;11:153–60.PubMedCrossRef Kunac DL, Kennedy J, Austin N, et al. Incidence, preventability, and impact of Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) and potential ADEs in hospitalized children in New Zealand: a prospective observational cohort study. Paediatr Drugs. 2009;11:153–60.PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Ashley L, Armitage G, Neary M, et al. A practical guide to failure mode and effects analysis in healthcare: making the most of the team and its meetings. JE Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36:351–8. Ashley L, Armitage G, Neary M, et al. A practical guide to failure mode and effects analysis in healthcare: making the most of the team and its meetings. JE Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010;36:351–8.
12.
go back to reference Bonnabry P, Cingria L, Sadeghipour F, et al. Use of a systematic risk analysis method to improve security in the pediatric parenteral nutrition production. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:93–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Bonnabry P, Cingria L, Sadeghipour F, et al. Use of a systematic risk analysis method to improve security in the pediatric parenteral nutrition production. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:93–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bonnabry P, Cingria L, Ackermann M, et al. Use a prospective risk analysis method to improve the safety of the cancer chemotherapy process. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18:9–16.PubMedCrossRef Bonnabry P, Cingria L, Ackermann M, et al. Use a prospective risk analysis method to improve the safety of the cancer chemotherapy process. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18:9–16.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bonnabry P, Despond-Gros C, Grauser D, et al. A risk analysis method to evaluate the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:453–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Bonnabry P, Despond-Gros C, Grauser D, et al. A risk analysis method to evaluate the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on patient safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:453–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference De Giorgi I, Fonzo-Christe C, Cingria L, et al. Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22:170–8.PubMedCrossRef De Giorgi I, Fonzo-Christe C, Cingria L, et al. Risk and pharmacoeconomic analyses of the injectable medication process in the paediatric and neonatal intensive care units. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22:170–8.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Benn J, Koutantji M, Wallace L, et al. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:11–21.PubMedCrossRef Benn J, Koutantji M, Wallace L, et al. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:11–21.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Terezakis SA, Harris KM, Ford E et al. An evaluation of departmental radiation oncology incident reports: anticipating a national reporting system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;85:919–23.PubMedCrossRef Terezakis SA, Harris KM, Ford E et al. An evaluation of departmental radiation oncology incident reports: anticipating a national reporting system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;85:919–23.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tighe CM, Woloshynowych M, Brown R, et al. Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006;14:27–37.PubMedCrossRef Tighe CM, Woloshynowych M, Brown R, et al. Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006;14:27–37.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kousgaard MB, Joensen AS, Thorsen T. Reasons for not reporting patient safety incidents in general practice: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30:199–205.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Kousgaard MB, Joensen AS, Thorsen T. Reasons for not reporting patient safety incidents in general practice: a qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30:199–205.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference William E, Talley R. The use of failure mode effect and criticality analysis in a medication error subcommittee. Hosp Pharm 1994; 29:331–2, 334–6, 339. William E, Talley R. The use of failure mode effect and criticality analysis in a medication error subcommittee. Hosp Pharm 1994; 29:331–2, 334–6, 339.
23.
go back to reference Potts AL, Barr FE, Gregory DF, Wright L, Patel NR. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit. Pediatrics. 2004;113:59–63.PubMedCrossRef Potts AL, Barr FE, Gregory DF, Wright L, Patel NR. Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit. Pediatrics. 2004;113:59–63.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wang JK, Herzog NS, Kaushal R, Park C, Mochizuki C, Weingarten SR. Prevention of pediatric medication errors by hospital pharmacists and the potential benefit of computerized physician order entry. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e77–85.PubMedCrossRef Wang JK, Herzog NS, Kaushal R, Park C, Mochizuki C, Weingarten SR. Prevention of pediatric medication errors by hospital pharmacists and the potential benefit of computerized physician order entry. Pediatrics. 2007;119:e77–85.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Shebl NA, Franklin B, Barber N, et al. Failure mode and effect analysis: views of hospital staff in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17:37–43.PubMedCrossRef Shebl NA, Franklin B, Barber N, et al. Failure mode and effect analysis: views of hospital staff in the UK. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17:37–43.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Shebl NA, Franklin BD, Barber N. Failure mode and effects analysis outputs: are they valid? BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:15.CrossRef Shebl NA, Franklin BD, Barber N. Failure mode and effects analysis outputs: are they valid? BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:15.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prospective risk analysis and incident reporting for better pharmaceutical care at paediatric hospital discharge
Authors
Laure-Zoé Kaestli
Laurence Cingria
Caroline Fonzo-Christe
Pascal Bonnabry
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-014-9977-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2014 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine