Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2010

01-10-2010 | Research Article

Satisfaction predictors and attitudes towards electronic prescribing systems in three UK hospitals

Authors: Derar H. Abdel-Qader, Judith A. Cantrill, Mary P. Tully

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective Measuring satisfaction of technology users, along with satisfaction determinants, is important to enhance system utilisation and identify potential problems. The aim of this study was to investigate pharmacists’ and doctors’ attitudes towards e-prescribing systems, and assess the predictors of their satisfaction. Method A cross-sectional survey was conducted, with 67 pharmacists and 335 doctors in three English hospitals completing a pre-piloted, postal questionnaire. Results The majority of pharmacists and doctors agreed that their e-prescribing system improved the efficiency of prescribing, and reduced dosage regimen errors. However, the majority did not believe that the system created more time for near-patient clinical activities, or sped up patient discharge. More pharmacists than doctors believed that the system improved the quality of patient care. Doctors were more likely to perceive that the e-prescribing system reduced formulation and omission errors. Doctors and pharmacists from the same hospital had similar opinions about the strengths and weaknesses of the e-prescribing system. Nine variables (out of 29 potential independent variables), seven of which were related to e-prescribing system efficiency, were significant predictors of user satisfaction. Conclusion Overall, respondents were satisfied with the systems; however, pharmacists were generally more satisfied than doctors. The number of satisfaction predictors related to the feelings about e-prescribing system efficiency was larger than those predictors related to the quality of patient care. Implications for practice These findings contribute to better understanding of how pharmacists and doctors perceive e-prescribing systems, and also have implications for system development, training, and how an e-prescribing system can be most effectively ‘marketed’ to different user groups.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Teich JM, Hurley JF, Beckley RF, Aranow M. Design of an easy-to-use physician order entry system with support for nursing and ancillary departments. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992;16:99–103. Teich JM, Hurley JF, Beckley RF, Aranow M. Design of an easy-to-use physician order entry system with support for nursing and ancillary departments. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992;16:99–103.
2.
go back to reference Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(18):2741–7.CrossRefPubMed Teich JM, Merchia PR, Schmiz JL, Kuperman GJ, Spurr CD, Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry on prescribing practices. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(18):2741–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chin HL, Wallace P. Embedding guidelines into direct physician order entry: simple methods, powerful results. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999;1999:221–5. Chin HL, Wallace P. Embedding guidelines into direct physician order entry: simple methods, powerful results. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999;1999:221–5.
4.
go back to reference Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(2):135–42.PubMed Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(2):135–42.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Jha A, Teich JM, Orav EJ, Ma’Luf N, et al. Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(21):2501–8.CrossRefPubMed Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Jha A, Teich JM, Orav EJ, Ma’Luf N, et al. Does the computerized display of charges affect inpatient ancillary test utilization? Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(21):2501–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Machan C, Siebert U. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(5):585–600.CrossRefPubMed Ammenwerth E, Schnell-Inderst P, Machan C, Siebert U. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(5):585–600.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH). Electronic prescribing in hospitals—challenges and lessons learned. Report commissioned by NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH), Leeds. 2009. NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH). Electronic prescribing in hospitals—challenges and lessons learned. Report commissioned by NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH), Leeds. 2009.
8.
go back to reference Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra R, Campbell E, Guappone K. The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings from a mixed methods exploration. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(Suppl 1):S69-76.CrossRefPubMed Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra R, Campbell E, Guappone K. The unintended consequences of computerized provider order entry: Findings from a mixed methods exploration. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78(Suppl 1):S69-76.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sittig DF, Krall M, Kaalaas-Sittig J, Ash JS. Emotional aspects of computer-based provider order entry: a qualitative study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):561–7.CrossRefPubMed Sittig DF, Krall M, Kaalaas-Sittig J, Ash JS. Emotional aspects of computer-based provider order entry: a qualitative study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(5):561–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Murff HJ, Kannry J. Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(5):499–509.PubMed Murff HJ, Kannry J. Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8(5):499–509.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Miller RA, Gardner RM. Recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. American medical informatics association, computer-based patient record institute, medical library association, association of academic health science libraries, American health information management association, American nurses association. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(6):442–57.PubMed Miller RA, Gardner RM. Recommendations for responsible monitoring and regulation of clinical software systems. American medical informatics association, computer-based patient record institute, medical library association, association of academic health science libraries, American health information management association, American nurses association. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4(6):442–57.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW, Lee F, Teich JM, et al. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3(1):42–55.PubMed Lee F, Teich JM, Spurr CD, Bates DW, Lee F, Teich JM, et al. Implementation of physician order entry: user satisfaction and self-reported usage patterns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;3(1):42–55.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Lindenauer PK, Ling D, Pekow PS, Crawford A, Naglieri-Prescod D, Hoople N, et al. Physician characteristics, attitudes, and use of computerized order entry. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):221–30.CrossRefPubMed Lindenauer PK, Ling D, Pekow PS, Crawford A, Naglieri-Prescod D, Hoople N, et al. Physician characteristics, attitudes, and use of computerized order entry. J Hosp Med. 2006;1(4):221–30.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pizzi LT, Suh DC, Barone J, Nash DB. Factors related to physicians’ adoption of electronic prescribing: results from a national survey. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20(1):22–32.CrossRefPubMed Pizzi LT, Suh DC, Barone J, Nash DB. Factors related to physicians’ adoption of electronic prescribing: results from a national survey. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20(1):22–32.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ, Wolinsky FD. Medical students’ and housestaff’s opinions of computerized order-writing. Acad Med. 1994;69(5):386–9.CrossRefPubMed Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ, Wolinsky FD. Medical students’ and housestaff’s opinions of computerized order-writing. Acad Med. 1994;69(5):386–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Weiner M, Gress T, Thiemann DR, Jenckes M, Reel SL, Mandell SF, et al. Contrasting views of physicians and nurses about an inpatient computer-based provider order-entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(3):234–44.PubMed Weiner M, Gress T, Thiemann DR, Jenckes M, Reel SL, Mandell SF, et al. Contrasting views of physicians and nurses about an inpatient computer-based provider order-entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(3):234–44.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Wilson JP, Bulatao PT, Rascati KL, Wilson JP, Bulatao PT, Rascati KL. Satisfaction with a computerized practitioner order-entry system at two military health care facilities. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2000;57(23):2188–95.PubMed Wilson JP, Bulatao PT, Rascati KL, Wilson JP, Bulatao PT, Rascati KL. Satisfaction with a computerized practitioner order-entry system at two military health care facilities. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2000;57(23):2188–95.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ravnan MC, Ravnan SL, Manzo BA. Physician attitudes toward computerized medication order entry. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting, vol. 36(Dec). 2001. p. 385E. Ravnan MC, Ravnan SL, Manzo BA. Physician attitudes toward computerized medication order entry. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting, vol. 36(Dec). 2001. p. 385E.
19.
go back to reference Shek C, Sittig DF, Kuperman GJ, Fanikos J, Seger DL. Pharmacists’ satisfaction with a physician order entry (POE) system. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting, vol. 34(Dec). 1999. p. 28R. Shek C, Sittig DF, Kuperman GJ, Fanikos J, Seger DL. Pharmacists’ satisfaction with a physician order entry (POE) system. ASHP Midyear Clinical Meeting, vol. 34(Dec). 1999. p. 28R.
20.
go back to reference Snyder R, Fields W. Community hospital physician adoption of a CPOE system: perceptions of readiness, usefulness, and satisfaction. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding. 2007. p. 1117. Snyder R, Fields W. Community hospital physician adoption of a CPOE system: perceptions of readiness, usefulness, and satisfaction. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding. 2007. p. 1117.
21.
go back to reference Wess ML, Hegner C, Anderson PF, Thelen G, Embi PJ, Besier JL et al. Effect of a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system on provider and nurse satisfaction at a community hospital and university hospital. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding. 2007. p. 1152. Wess ML, Hegner C, Anderson PF, Thelen G, Embi PJ, Besier JL et al. Effect of a computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system on provider and nurse satisfaction at a community hospital and university hospital. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceeding. 2007. p. 1152.
22.
go back to reference Reckmann MH, Westbrook JI, Koh Y, Lo C, Day RO. Does computerized provider order entry reduce prescribing errors for hospital inpatients? A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:613–23.CrossRefPubMed Reckmann MH, Westbrook JI, Koh Y, Lo C, Day RO. Does computerized provider order entry reduce prescribing errors for hospital inpatients? A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:613–23.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Franklin BD, O’Grady K, Donyai P, Jacklin A, Barber N. The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(4):279–84.CrossRefPubMed Franklin BD, O’Grady K, Donyai P, Jacklin A, Barber N. The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(4):279–84.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Goundrey-Smith SJ. Electronic prescribing-experience in the UK and system design issues. Pharm J. 2006;277:485–9. Goundrey-Smith SJ. Electronic prescribing-experience in the UK and system design issues. Pharm J. 2006;277:485–9.
25.
go back to reference Andrews F, Withey S. Social indicators of well-being: American perceptions of life quality. New York: Putnam Press; 1976. Andrews F, Withey S. Social indicators of well-being: American perceptions of life quality. New York: Putnam Press; 1976.
26.
go back to reference Westbrook R. A rating scale for measuring product/service satisfaction. J Mark. 1980;44:68–72.CrossRef Westbrook R. A rating scale for measuring product/service satisfaction. J Mark. 1980;44:68–72.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cutler DM, Feldman NE, Horwitz JR. U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(6):1654–63.CrossRef Cutler DM, Feldman NE, Horwitz JR. U.S. adoption of computerized physician order entry systems. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(6):1654–63.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Acad Med. 1993;68(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed Massaro TA. Introducing physician order entry at a major academic medical center: II. Impact on medical education. Acad Med. 1993;68(1):25–30.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ghahramani N, Lendel I, Haque R, Sawruk K. User satisfaction with computerized order entry system and its effect on workplace level of stress. J Med Syst. 2009;33(3):199–205.CrossRefPubMed Ghahramani N, Lendel I, Haque R, Sawruk K. User satisfaction with computerized order entry system and its effect on workplace level of stress. J Med Syst. 2009;33(3):199–205.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bates DW, Boyle DL, Teich JM. Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 996. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Teich JM. Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 996.
31.
go back to reference Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1(2):108–23.PubMed Sittig DF, Stead WW. Computer-based physician order entry: the state of the art. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994;1(2):108–23.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Harlow LL, Rossi JS, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: a review. Health Educ Q. 1994;21(4):471–86.PubMed Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Harlow LL, Rossi JS, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: a review. Health Educ Q. 1994;21(4):471–86.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Quinn FB Jr, Hokanson JA, McCracken MM, Stiernberg CM. Dissemination of computer skills among physicians: the infectious process model. J Med Syst. 1984;8(4):307–17.CrossRefPubMed Quinn FB Jr, Hokanson JA, McCracken MM, Stiernberg CM. Dissemination of computer skills among physicians: the infectious process model. J Med Syst. 1984;8(4):307–17.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Satisfaction predictors and attitudes towards electronic prescribing systems in three UK hospitals
Authors
Derar H. Abdel-Qader
Judith A. Cantrill
Mary P. Tully
Publication date
01-10-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 2210-7703
Electronic ISSN: 2210-7711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-010-9411-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 5/2010 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine