Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2015

01-03-2015 | Clinical Study

Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma

Authors: Victor A. Levin, Nancy D. Mendelssohn, James Chan, Mady C. Stovall, Scott J. Peak, Jennie L. Yee, Rita L. Hui, David M. Chen

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Bevacizumab (BEV, Avastin®) produces durable objective radiological responses of 20–26 %, median response durations of 16–18 weeks, and median overall survival (mOS) of 31–40 weeks. While the use of BEV is well-established, the lack of dose–response studies in glioblastoma (GBM) patients raises the question whether current dosing practice is optimal. As a result of differing approaches to BEV dosing that ranged from the FDA approved package insert dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks to 7.5 mg/kg every 3–4 weeks, among physicians within Northern California Kaiser Permanente hospitals over 4+ years, we did an IRB-approved retrospective analysis of patients seen in Northern California Kaiser Permanente facilities and treated with BEV. Between September 1, 2008 and August 31, 2013, 181 patients received BEV for tumor progression/recurrence starting 2.6 weeks after completion of chemoradiation. The integrated BEV administered dose-week (AUCBEV) for all patients had a median AUCBEV of 3.6 mg·wk/kg). Maximum likelihood analysis found patients over 65 years did worse than younger patients (p = 0.004), women lived longer (p = 0.002), and patients treated below the AUCBEV did better than those treated above the median AUCBEV (p = 0.003). mOS for BEV starting 1 month after chemoradiation was 45 versus 68 weeks (p = 0.012) and BEV starting 3 months after chemoradiation was 40 versus 74 weeks (p = 0.0085). Dosing BEV at half the standard dose for progressive/recurrent GBM was at least equivalent to or, maybe better than standard dosing. Unexplained was the observation that females had longer OS with BEV than males.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(28):4733–4740CrossRefPubMed Friedman HS, Prados MD, Wen PY et al (2009) Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(28):4733–4740CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cohen MH, Shen YL, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2009) FDA drug approval summary: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) as treatment of recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. Oncologist 14(11):1131–1138CrossRefPubMed Cohen MH, Shen YL, Keegan P, Pazdur R (2009) FDA drug approval summary: Bevacizumab (Avastin®) as treatment of recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. Oncologist 14(11):1131–1138CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Herndon JE II et al (2008) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent WHO grade 3 malignant gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 14(21):7068–7073CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Herndon JE II et al (2008) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent WHO grade 3 malignant gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 14(21):7068–7073CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K et al (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(5):740–745CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kreisl TN, Kim L, Moore K et al (2009) Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 27(5):740–745CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gonzalez J, Kumar AJ, Conrad CA, Levin VA (2007) Effect of bevacizumab on radiation necrosis of the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(2):323–326CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez J, Kumar AJ, Conrad CA, Levin VA (2007) Effect of bevacizumab on radiation necrosis of the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(2):323–326CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Levin VA, Bidaut L, Hou P et al (2011) Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab therapy for radiation necrosis of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(5):1487–1495CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Levin VA, Bidaut L, Hou P et al (2011) Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab therapy for radiation necrosis of the central nervous system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(5):1487–1495CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wong ET, Huberman M, Lu XQ, Mahadevan A (2008) Bevacizumab Reverses Cerebral Radiation Necrosis. J Clin Oncol 26:5649–5650CrossRefPubMed Wong ET, Huberman M, Lu XQ, Mahadevan A (2008) Bevacizumab Reverses Cerebral Radiation Necrosis. J Clin Oncol 26:5649–5650CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Liu AK, Macy ME, Foreman NK (2009) Bevacizumab as therapy for radiation necrosis in four children with pontine gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(4):1148–1154CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Liu AK, Macy ME, Foreman NK (2009) Bevacizumab as therapy for radiation necrosis in four children with pontine gliomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 75(4):1148–1154CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Torcuator R, Zuniga R, Mohan YS et al (2009) Initial experience with bevacizumab treatment for biopsy confirmed cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 94(1):63–68CrossRefPubMed Torcuator R, Zuniga R, Mohan YS et al (2009) Initial experience with bevacizumab treatment for biopsy confirmed cerebral radiation necrosis. J Neurooncol 94(1):63–68CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lubelski D, Abdullah K, Weil R, Marko N (2013) Bevacizumab for radiation necrosis following treatment of high grade glioma: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurooncol 115(3):317–322CrossRefPubMed Lubelski D, Abdullah K, Weil R, Marko N (2013) Bevacizumab for radiation necrosis following treatment of high grade glioma: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurooncol 115(3):317–322CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lu JF, Bruno R, Eppler S, Novotny W, Lum B, Gaudreault J (2008) Clinical pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62(5):779–786CrossRefPubMed Lu JF, Bruno R, Eppler S, Novotny W, Lum B, Gaudreault J (2008) Clinical pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62(5):779–786CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wick W, Weller M, van den Bent M, Stupp R (2010) Bevacizumab and recurrent malignant gliomas: a European perspective. J Clin Oncol. 28(12):e188–e189 (author reply e190-182)CrossRefPubMed Wick W, Weller M, van den Bent M, Stupp R (2010) Bevacizumab and recurrent malignant gliomas: a European perspective. J Clin Oncol. 28(12):e188–e189 (author reply e190-182)CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Levin VA, Edwards MS, Wright DC et al (1980) Modified procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV 3) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Cancer Treat Rep 64(2–3):237–244PubMed Levin VA, Edwards MS, Wright DC et al (1980) Modified procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV 3) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant brain tumors. Cancer Treat Rep 64(2–3):237–244PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimates from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimates from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 53:457–481CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50(3):163–170PubMed Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50(3):163–170PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gehan EA (1965) A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 52:203–223CrossRefPubMed Gehan EA (1965) A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 52:203–223CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hoffman WF, Levin VA, Wilson CB (1979) Evaluation of malignant glioma patients during the postirradiation period. J Neurosurg 50(5):624–628CrossRefPubMed Hoffman WF, Levin VA, Wilson CB (1979) Evaluation of malignant glioma patients during the postirradiation period. J Neurosurg 50(5):624–628CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F et al (2008) Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncol. 10(3):361–367CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Spagnolli F et al (2008) Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro Oncol. 10(3):361–367CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9(5):453–461CrossRefPubMed Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9(5):453–461CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Chamberlain MC (2008) Pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 26(26):4359 author reply 4359–4360CrossRefPubMed Chamberlain MC (2008) Pseudoprogression in glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 26(26):4359 author reply 4359–4360CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brandsma D, van den Bent MJ (2009) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol 22(6):633–638CrossRefPubMed Brandsma D, van den Bent MJ (2009) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse in the treatment of gliomas. Curr Opin Neurol 22(6):633–638CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chaskis C, Neyns B, Michotte A, de Ridder M, Everaert H (2009) Pseudoprogression after radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for high-grade glioma: clinical observations and working recommendations. Surg Neurol 72(4):423–428CrossRefPubMed Chaskis C, Neyns B, Michotte A, de Ridder M, Everaert H (2009) Pseudoprogression after radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for high-grade glioma: clinical observations and working recommendations. Surg Neurol 72(4):423–428CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Clarke JL, Chang S (2009) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: challenges in brain tumor imaging. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 9(3):241–246CrossRefPubMed Clarke JL, Chang S (2009) Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: challenges in brain tumor imaging. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 9(3):241–246CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(9):943–953CrossRefPubMed Taal W, Oosterkamp HM, Walenkamp AM et al (2014) Single-agent bevacizumab or lomustine versus a combination of bevacizumab plus lomustine in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (BELOB trial): a randomised controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(9):943–953CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Piccioni DE, Selfridge J, Mody RR et al (2014) Deferred use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is not associated with diminished efficacy. Neuro Oncol 16(6):815–822CrossRefPubMed Piccioni DE, Selfridge J, Mody RR et al (2014) Deferred use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is not associated with diminished efficacy. Neuro Oncol 16(6):815–822CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Raizer JJ, Grimm S, Chamberlain MC et al (2010) A phase 2 trial of single-agent bevacizumab given in an every-3-week schedule for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. Cancer 116(22):5297–5305CrossRefPubMed Raizer JJ, Grimm S, Chamberlain MC et al (2010) A phase 2 trial of single-agent bevacizumab given in an every-3-week schedule for patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. Cancer 116(22):5297–5305CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wong ET, Gautam S, Malchow C, Lun M, Pan E, Brem S (2011) Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 9(4):403–407PubMed Wong ET, Gautam S, Malchow C, Lun M, Pan E, Brem S (2011) Bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a meta-analysis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 9(4):403–407PubMed
28.
go back to reference Rodriguez MA, DeJesus AY, Cheng L (2014) Use of chemotherapy within the last 14 days of life in patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. JAMA Intern Med 174(6):989–991CrossRefPubMed Rodriguez MA, DeJesus AY, Cheng L (2014) Use of chemotherapy within the last 14 days of life in patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. JAMA Intern Med 174(6):989–991CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of bevacizumab administered dose on overall survival of patients with progressive glioblastoma
Authors
Victor A. Levin
Nancy D. Mendelssohn
James Chan
Mady C. Stovall
Scott J. Peak
Jennie L. Yee
Rita L. Hui
David M. Chen
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-014-1693-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 1/2015 Go to the issue