Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2009

01-06-2009 | Clinical study - patient study

Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors

Authors: Fusako Waki, Masashi Ando, Atsuo Takashima, Kan Yonemori, Hiroshi Nokihara, Mototaka Miyake, Ukihide Tateishi, Koji Tsuta, Yasuhiro Shimada, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Tomohide Tamura

Published in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Issue 2/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) occurs in 4–15% of patients with solid tumors. Although the clinical outcomes in cancer patients have been improving recently, no standard treatment for LM has been established as yet. The purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors in patients with solid tumors with cytologically proven LM. Methods We retrospectively analyzed a series of 85 consecutive patients with cytologically proven LM who were treated between 1997 and 2005. Results The primary diseases were as follows; lung cancer (n = 36), breast cancer (n = 33), gastric cancer (n = 8), and others (n = 8). Forty-nine patients had brain metastasis at the time of diagnosis of the LM, and in 51 patients, MRI revealed meningeal dissemination in the brain or spine. The performance status (PS) was 0–1 in 26 patients and 2–4 in 59 patients. Thirty-one patients, including 19 with breast cancer, four with lung cancer, five with gastric cancer and three with other cancers, were treated by intrathecal (IT) chemotherapy. The response rate to the IT was 52% (95% confidence interval (CI): 41.4–62.6%). The median survival was 51 days (range, 3–759 days). A univariate analysis identified breast cancer, good PS (0–1), time to development of the LM (>1 year), and treatment by IT chemotherapy as being associated with a good prognosis, and multivariate analysis identified poor PS (HR: 1.72 (95% CI, 1.04–2.86) P = 0.04) and MRI-proven LM (HR: 1.82 (95% CI, 1.11–2.98) P = 0.02) as being associated with a poor prognosis. Conclusion In patients with poor prognostic factors, such as poor PS or MRI-proven LM, palliative therapy might be the most suitable treatment strategy.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Jayson GC, Howell A (1996) Carcinomatous meningitis in solid tumors. Ann Oncol 7:773–786PubMed Jayson GC, Howell A (1996) Carcinomatous meningitis in solid tumors. Ann Oncol 7:773–786PubMed
4.
go back to reference Glass JP, Melamed M, Chernik NL et al (1979) Malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): the meaning of a positive CSF cytology. Neurology 29:1369–1375PubMed Glass JP, Melamed M, Chernik NL et al (1979) Malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): the meaning of a positive CSF cytology. Neurology 29:1369–1375PubMed
5.
go back to reference Wasserstorm WR, Glass JP, Posner JB (1982) Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer 49:759–772. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19820215)49:4<759::AID-CNCR2820490427>3.0.CO;2-7CrossRef Wasserstorm WR, Glass JP, Posner JB (1982) Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer 49:759–772. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19820215)49:4<759::AID-CNCR2820490427>3.0.CO;2-7CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Singh SK, Agris JM, Leeds NE et al (2000) Intracranial leptomeningeal metastases: comparison of depiction at FLAIR and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 217:50–53PubMed Singh SK, Agris JM, Leeds NE et al (2000) Intracranial leptomeningeal metastases: comparison of depiction at FLAIR and contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 217:50–53PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rodesch G, Van Bogaert P, Mavroudakis N et al (1990) Neuroradiologic findings in leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: the value interest of gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Neuroradiology 32:26–32. doi:10.1007/BF00593937 PubMedCrossRef Rodesch G, Van Bogaert P, Mavroudakis N et al (1990) Neuroradiologic findings in leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: the value interest of gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Neuroradiology 32:26–32. doi:10.​1007/​BF00593937 PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jayson GC, Howell A, Harris M et al (1994) Carcinomatous meningitis in patients with breast cancer. Cancer 74:3135–3141. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19941215)74:12<3135::AID-CNCR2820741212>3.0.CO;2-8PubMedCrossRef Jayson GC, Howell A, Harris M et al (1994) Carcinomatous meningitis in patients with breast cancer. Cancer 74:3135–3141. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19941215)74:12<3135::AID-CNCR2820741212>3.0.CO;2-8PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boogerd W, Hart AA, van der Sande JJ et al (1991) Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer. Cancer 67:1685–1695. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19910315)67:6<1685::AID-CNCR2820670635>3.0.CO;2-MPubMedCrossRef Boogerd W, Hart AA, van der Sande JJ et al (1991) Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer. Cancer 67:1685–1695. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19910315)67:6<1685::AID-CNCR2820670635>3.0.CO;2-MPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fizazi K, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A et al (1996) Meningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 77:1315–1323. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1315::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-4PubMedCrossRef Fizazi K, Asselain B, Vincent-Salomon A et al (1996) Meningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 77:1315–1323. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960401)77:7<1315::AID-CNCR14>3.0.CO;2-4PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Orlando L, Curigliano G, Colleoni M et al (2002) Intrathecal chemotherapy in carcinomatous meningitis from breast cancer. Anticancer Res 22:3057–3060PubMed Orlando L, Curigliano G, Colleoni M et al (2002) Intrathecal chemotherapy in carcinomatous meningitis from breast cancer. Anticancer Res 22:3057–3060PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hitchins RN, Bell DR, Woods RL et al (1987) A prospective randomized trial of single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in meningeal carcinomatosis. J Clin Oncol 5:1655–1662PubMed Hitchins RN, Bell DR, Woods RL et al (1987) A prospective randomized trial of single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in meningeal carcinomatosis. J Clin Oncol 5:1655–1662PubMed
19.
go back to reference Grossman SA, Finkelstein DM, Ruckdeschel JC et al (1993) Randomized prospective comparison of intraventricular methotrexate and thiotepa in patients with previously untreated neoplastic meningitis. Eastern cooperative oncology group. J Clin Oncol 11:561–569PubMed Grossman SA, Finkelstein DM, Ruckdeschel JC et al (1993) Randomized prospective comparison of intraventricular methotrexate and thiotepa in patients with previously untreated neoplastic meningitis. Eastern cooperative oncology group. J Clin Oncol 11:561–569PubMed
21.
go back to reference Posner JB (1995) Neurologic complications of cancer. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia Posner JB (1995) Neurologic complications of cancer. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia
24.
go back to reference NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology (2007) Central nervous system cancers, carcinomatous/lymphomatous meningitis (CLMEN-1). Version 1:21–24 NCCN Clinical Practice Guideline in Oncology (2007) Central nervous system cancers, carcinomatous/lymphomatous meningitis (CLMEN-1). Version 1:21–24
Metadata
Title
Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors
Authors
Fusako Waki
Masashi Ando
Atsuo Takashima
Kan Yonemori
Hiroshi Nokihara
Mototaka Miyake
Ukihide Tateishi
Koji Tsuta
Yasuhiro Shimada
Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Tomohide Tamura
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9758-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2/2009 Go to the issue