Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1/2024

11-01-2024 | Scientific Contribution

From a critique of the principle of autonomy to an ethic of heteronomy

Author: Florian Martinet-Kosinski

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Etymologically, autonomy is the ability to give oneself rules and follow them. It is an important principle of medical ethics, which can sometimes raise some tensions in the care relationship. We propose a new definition of ethics, the ethics of heteronomy: a self-normative, discursive and responsible autonomy. Autonomy cannot be considered without the responsibility each person must have towards others. In the care relationship, autonomy would be more the ability of each person to reach out to others than the ability to decide alone. The care relationship must be seen as an accompaniment of equals where each person allows the other to be rephrased. Autonomy would then no longer be absolute but relative to each situation. Being autonomous would become an ability for adaptation of the patient-doctor pair. The accompaniment allows the birth of a relationship of trust, giving the patient and the doctor the ability to touch and let themselves be touched, thus making each one progress in this reciprocal dialectic. The care relationship becomes the possibility of considering autonomy as a collective and not as an individual notion only. Paradoxically, by promoting the autonomy of the patient-doctor pair, they both develop their own autonomy.
Literature
go back to reference Arrow, K.J. 2004. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. 1963. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 82 (2): 141–149.PubMedPubMedCentral Arrow, K.J. 2004. Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. 1963. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 82 (2): 141–149.PubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Barrier, P. 2014. [The autonomous patient] Le patient autonome. 1st ed. France: PUF (Question de soin). Barrier, P. 2014. [The autonomous patient] Le patient autonome. 1st ed. France: PUF (Question de soin).
go back to reference Beal, C. 2012. John Stuart Mill and Liberal Paternalism. Archives De Philosophie 75 (2): 279–290.CrossRef Beal, C. 2012. John Stuart Mill and Liberal Paternalism. Archives De Philosophie 75 (2): 279–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed., 480. New York: OUP USA. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed., 480. New York: OUP USA.
go back to reference Beveridge, W. 1942. Report to the Parliament on Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO). Beveridge, W. 1942. Report to the Parliament on Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO).
go back to reference Canguilhem, G. 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. First American Edition. New York: Zone Books. Canguilhem, G. 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. First American Edition. New York: Zone Books.
go back to reference Châtel, T. 2010. [Ethics of “taking care”: solicitude, care, accompaniment] Ethique du “prendre soin” : sollicitude, care, accompagnement. In: Traité de bioéthique I : Fondements, principes, repères. Paris, France: érès, p. 84. Châtel, T. 2010. [Ethics of “taking care”: solicitude, care, accompaniment] Ethique du “prendre soin” : sollicitude, care, accompagnement. In: Traité de bioéthique I : Fondements, principes, repères. Paris, France: érès, p. 84.
go back to reference Dworkin, G. 2015. Defining Paternalism. In New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care. Springer. Dworkin, G. 2015. Defining Paternalism. In New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care. Springer.
go back to reference Foessel, M. 2011. [Kant or the virtues of autonomy] Kant ou les vertus de l’autonomie. Etudes 414 (3): 341–351. Foessel, M. 2011. [Kant or the virtues of autonomy] Kant ou les vertus de l’autonomie. Etudes 414 (3): 341–351.
go back to reference French Public Health Code - Article L1111-4. Public Health Code. French Public Health Code - Article L1111-4. Public Health Code.
go back to reference French Public Health Code - Article L1111-1. French Public Health Code. French Public Health Code - Article L1111-1. French Public Health Code.
go back to reference French Public Health Code - Article L1110-1. French Public Health Code. French Public Health Code - Article L1110-1. French Public Health Code.
go back to reference French Law No. 99-641 of July 27, 1999 creating universal health coverage. French Law No. 99-641 of July 27, 1999 creating universal health coverage.
go back to reference Gómez-Vírseda, C., Y. de Maeseneer, and C. Gastmans. 2019. Relational Autonomy: What Does It Mean and How Is It Used in End-of-Life Care? A Systematic Review of Argument-Based Ethics Literature. BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1): 76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gómez-Vírseda, C., Y. de Maeseneer, and C. Gastmans. 2019. Relational Autonomy: What Does It Mean and How Is It Used in End-of-Life Care? A Systematic Review of Argument-Based Ethics Literature. BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1): 76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, 1st ed., 225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, 1st ed., 225. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Habermas, J. 1994. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Reissue, 229. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Habermas, J. 1994. Justification and Application: Remarks on Discourse Ethics. Reissue, 229. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
go back to reference Hansen-Løve, L. 2016. [Does future humanity have rights?] L’humanité à venir a-t-elle des droits ? In: Cours particuliers de philosophie, questions pour le temps présent, 264–275. France: Belin. Hansen-Løve, L. 2016. [Does future humanity have rights?] L’humanité à venir a-t-elle des droits ? In: Cours particuliers de philosophie, questions pour le temps présent, 264–275. France: Belin.
go back to reference Hippocrates. 1923. Hippocrates, Volume I: Ancient Medicine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Hippocrates. 1923. Hippocrates, Volume I: Ancient Medicine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Hottois, G., and J.N. Missa. 2001. [New Encyclopedia of Bioethics] Nouvelle encyclopédie de la bioéthique. Bruxelles: De Boeck. Hottois, G., and J.N. Missa. 2001. [New Encyclopedia of Bioethics] Nouvelle encyclopédie de la bioéthique. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
go back to reference Jaffro, L. 2001. [Habermas and the subject of the discussion] Habermas et le sujet de la discussion. Cites 5 (1): 71–85. Jaffro, L. 2001. [Habermas and the subject of the discussion] Habermas et le sujet de la discussion. Cites 5 (1): 71–85.
go back to reference Jonas, H. 1985. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press. Jonas, H. 1985. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Kant, I. 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kant, I. 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Kant, I. 2015. Critique of Practical Reason, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kant, I. 2015. Critique of Practical Reason, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Le Pen, C., and P. Lévy. 2014. L’évaluation médico-économique, Concepts et méthodes. Paris: LGM Sciences. Le Pen, C., and P. Lévy. 2014. L’évaluation médico-économique, Concepts et méthodes. Paris: LGM Sciences.
go back to reference Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, 13262nd ed., 314. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority, 13262nd ed., 314. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
go back to reference Mill, J.S. 2002. On Liberty, 1st ed., 112. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. Mill, J.S. 2002. On Liberty, 1st ed., 112. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
go back to reference Plato. 2017. Plato: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Bilingual Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Plato. 2017. Plato: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Bilingual Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference [Responsibility: refusal of transfusion] Responsabilité : refus transfusionnel. Dalloz. 2007. (26): 1848–1853 [Responsibility: refusal of transfusion] Responsabilité : refus transfusionnel. Dalloz. 2007. (26): 1848–1853
go back to reference Ricoeur, P. 1995. Oneself as Another. Reissue Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ricoeur, P. 1995. Oneself as Another. Reissue Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Ricoeur, P. 2003. The Just. 1st Edition. Chicago, Ill.; London: University of Chicago Press. Ricoeur, P. 2003. The Just. 1st Edition. Chicago, Ill.; London: University of Chicago Press.
go back to reference Schieber, A.C., M. Kelly-Irving, J.P. Génolini, M. Membrado, L. Tanguy, C. Fabre, et al. 2017. Integrating Multidisciplinary Results to Produce New Knowledge About the Physician-Patient Relationship: A Methodology Applied to the INTERMEDE Project. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (2): 174–201.CrossRefPubMed Schieber, A.C., M. Kelly-Irving, J.P. Génolini, M. Membrado, L. Tanguy, C. Fabre, et al. 2017. Integrating Multidisciplinary Results to Produce New Knowledge About the Physician-Patient Relationship: A Methodology Applied to the INTERMEDE Project. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (2): 174–201.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spaulding, J.A., G. Simpson, and D.E. Suicide. 2010. A Study in Sociology. Reissue Edition. New York: Free Press. Spaulding, J.A., G. Simpson, and D.E. Suicide. 2010. A Study in Sociology. Reissue Edition. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Spinoza, B. 1676. Letter LXXVIII to Oldenburg. Spinoza, B. 1676. Letter LXXVIII to Oldenburg.
go back to reference Spinoza. 2000. Ethics. New Edition. New York: Oxford University Press. Spinoza. 2000. Ethics. New Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Stroumsa, D., E.F.S. Roberts, H. Kinnear, and L.H. Harris. 2019. The Power and Limits of Classification—A 32-Year-Old Man with Abdominal Pain. New England Journal of Medicine 380 (20): 1885–1888.CrossRefPubMed Stroumsa, D., E.F.S. Roberts, H. Kinnear, and L.H. Harris. 2019. The Power and Limits of Classification—A 32-Year-Old Man with Abdominal Pain. New England Journal of Medicine 380 (20): 1885–1888.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
From a critique of the principle of autonomy to an ethic of heteronomy
Author
Florian Martinet-Kosinski
Publication date
11-01-2024
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-023-10185-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1/2024 Go to the issue

Scientific Contribution

Sharing a medical decision