Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2022

Open Access 01-10-2022 | Review Article

Ethical, legal, and social aspects of symptom checker applications: a scoping review

Authors: Regina Müller, Malte Klemmt, Hans-Jörg Ehni, Tanja Henking, Angelina Kuhnmünch, Christine Preiser, Roland Koch, Robert Ranisch

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Symptom Checker Applications (SCA) are mobile applications often designed for the end-user to assist with symptom assessment and self-triage. SCA are meant to provide the user with easily accessible information about their own health conditions. However, SCA raise questions regarding ethical, legal, and social aspects (ELSA), for example, regarding fair access to this new technology. The aim of this scoping review is to identify the ELSA of SCA in the scientific literature. A scoping review was conducted to identify the ELSA of SCA. Ten databases (e.g., Web of Science and PubMed) were used. Studies on SCA that address ELSA, written in English or German, were included in the review. The ELSA of SCA were extracted and synthesized using qualitative content analysis. A total of 25,061 references were identified, of which 39 were included in the analysis. The identified aspects were allotted to three main categories: (1) Technology; (2) Individual Level; and (3) Healthcare system. The results show that there are controversial debates in the literature on the ethical and social challenges of SCA usage. Furthermore, the debates are characterised by a lack of a specific legal perspective and empirical data. The review provides an overview on the spectrum of ELSA regarding SCA. It offers guidance to stakeholders in the healthcare system, for example, patients, healthcare professionals, and insurance providers and could be used in future empirical research to investigate the perspectives of those affected, such as users.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
In the context of SCA, the term "triage" refers to the referral of users to a suitable department for the most appropriate treatment or for further investigation within a reasonable timeframe. The appropriate treatment or investigation depends on the nature and urgency of the symptoms or their underlying cause.
 
Literature
go back to reference Aboueid, S., R.H. Liu, B.N. Desta, A. Chaurasia, and S. Ebrahim. 2019. The use of artificially intelligent self-diagnosing digital platforms by the general public: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Informatics 7 (2): e13445.CrossRef Aboueid, S., R.H. Liu, B.N. Desta, A. Chaurasia, and S. Ebrahim. 2019. The use of artificially intelligent self-diagnosing digital platforms by the general public: Scoping review. JMIR Medical Informatics 7 (2): e13445.CrossRef
go back to reference Aboueid, S., S. Meyer, J.R. Wallace, S. Mahajan, and A. Chaurasia. 2021. Young adults’ perspectives on the use of symptom checkers for self-triage and self-diagnosis: Qualitative study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 7 (1): e22637.CrossRef Aboueid, S., S. Meyer, J.R. Wallace, S. Mahajan, and A. Chaurasia. 2021. Young adults’ perspectives on the use of symptom checkers for self-triage and self-diagnosis: Qualitative study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 7 (1): e22637.CrossRef
go back to reference Ali, E.E., L. Chew, and K.Y. Yap. 2016. Evolution and current status of mHealth research: A systematic review. BMJ Innovations 2: 33–40.CrossRef Ali, E.E., L. Chew, and K.Y. Yap. 2016. Evolution and current status of mHealth research: A systematic review. BMJ Innovations 2: 33–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Arellano CK, Chittamuru D, Kravitz RL, Ramondt S, Ramírez AS. Beyond Dr. Google: Health information seeking from an intelligent online symptom checker: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. JMIR. 24/05/2022:36322 (forthcoming/in press). Arellano CK, Chittamuru D, Kravitz RL, Ramondt S, Ramírez AS. Beyond Dr. Google: Health information seeking from an intelligent online symptom checker: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. JMIR. 24/05/2022:36322 (forthcoming/in press).
go back to reference Berry, A.C., B.D. Cash, B. Wang, M.S. Mulekar, A.B. Van Haneghan, K. Yuquimpo, et al. 2019. Online symptom checker diagnostic and triage accuracy for HIV and Hepatitis C. Epidemiology and Infection 147: e104.CrossRef Berry, A.C., B.D. Cash, B. Wang, M.S. Mulekar, A.B. Van Haneghan, K. Yuquimpo, et al. 2019. Online symptom checker diagnostic and triage accuracy for HIV and Hepatitis C. Epidemiology and Infection 147: e104.CrossRef
go back to reference Carroll, J.K., A. Moorhead, R. Bond, W.G. LeBlanc, R.J. Petrella, and K. Fiscella. 2017. Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytics approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (4): e125.CrossRef Carroll, J.K., A. Moorhead, R. Bond, W.G. LeBlanc, R.J. Petrella, and K. Fiscella. 2017. Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytics approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (4): e125.CrossRef
go back to reference Chambers, D., A. Cantrell, M. Johnson, L. Preston, S.K. Baxter, A. Booth, et al. 2019a. Digital and online symptom checkers and assessment services for urgent care to inform a new digital platform: A systematic review. Health Services and Delivery Research. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr07290.CrossRef Chambers, D., A. Cantrell, M. Johnson, L. Preston, S.K. Baxter, A. Booth, et al. 2019a. Digital and online symptom checkers and assessment services for urgent care to inform a new digital platform: A systematic review. Health Services and Delivery Research. https://​doi.​org/​10.​3310/​hsdr07290.CrossRef
go back to reference Chambers, D., A.J. Cantrell, M. Johnson, L. Preston, S.K. Baxter, A. Booth, et al. 2019b. Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: Systematic review. British Medical Journal Open 9 (8): e027743. Chambers, D., A.J. Cantrell, M. Johnson, L. Preston, S.K. Baxter, A. Booth, et al. 2019b. Digital and online symptom checkers and health assessment/triage services for urgent health problems: Systematic review. British Medical Journal Open 9 (8): e027743.
go back to reference Copeland C, Morreale P, Li JJ. M-Health application interface design for symptom checking. Proc. of the 10th Intl. Conf. on e-Health 2018 (EH 2018), Madrid, Spain, 2018, pp. 210-214. Copeland C, Morreale P, Li JJ. M-Health application interface design for symptom checking. Proc. of the 10th Intl. Conf. on e-Health 2018 (EH 2018), Madrid, Spain, 2018, pp. 210-214.
go back to reference Dunn, A.G. 2020. Will online symptom checkers improve health care in Australia? Medical Journal of Australia 212 (11): 512–513.CrossRef Dunn, A.G. 2020. Will online symptom checkers improve health care in Australia? Medical Journal of Australia 212 (11): 512–513.CrossRef
go back to reference Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open 4 (1): 2158244014522633.CrossRef Elo, S., M. Kääriäinen, O. Kanste, T. Pölkki, K. Utriainen, and H. Kyngäs. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open 4 (1): 2158244014522633.CrossRef
go back to reference Fiske, A., A. Buyx, and B. Prainsack. 2020. The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany. Social Science and Medicine 260: 1–10.CrossRef Fiske, A., A. Buyx, and B. Prainsack. 2020. The double-edged sword of digital self-care: Physician perspectives from Northern Germany. Social Science and Medicine 260: 1–10.CrossRef
go back to reference Fraser, H., E. Coiera, and D. Wong. 2018. Safety of patient-facing digital symptom checkers. Lancet 392 (10161): 2263–2264.CrossRef Fraser, H., E. Coiera, and D. Wong. 2018. Safety of patient-facing digital symptom checkers. Lancet 392 (10161): 2263–2264.CrossRef
go back to reference Gilbert, S., A. Mehl, A. Baluch, C. Cawley, J. Challiner, H. Fraser, et al. 2020. How accurate are digital symptom assessment apps for suggesting conditions and urgency advice? A clinical vignettes comparison to GPs. British Medical Journal Open 10 (12): e040269. Gilbert, S., A. Mehl, A. Baluch, C. Cawley, J. Challiner, H. Fraser, et al. 2020. How accurate are digital symptom assessment apps for suggesting conditions and urgency advice? A clinical vignettes comparison to GPs. British Medical Journal Open 10 (12): e040269.
go back to reference Hageman, M.G.J.S., J. Anderson, R. Blok, J.K.J. Bossen, and D. Ring. 2015. Internet self-diagnosis in hand surgery. The Hand 10 (3): 565–569.CrossRef Hageman, M.G.J.S., J. Anderson, R. Blok, J.K.J. Bossen, and D. Ring. 2015. Internet self-diagnosis in hand surgery. The Hand 10 (3): 565–569.CrossRef
go back to reference Herzog C. Technological opacity of machine learning in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference: "Challenges of Digital Inequality—Digital Education, Digital Work, Digital Life". 2019:1–9. Herzog C. Technological opacity of machine learning in healthcare. In: Proceedings of the Weizenbaum Conference: "Challenges of Digital Inequality—Digital Education, Digital Work, Digital Life". 2019:1–9.
go back to reference Hill, M.G., M. Sim, and B. Mills. 2020. The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 212 (11): 514–519.CrossRef Hill, M.G., M. Sim, and B. Mills. 2020. The quality of diagnosis and triage advice provided by free online symptom checkers and apps in Australia. Medical Journal of Australia 212 (11): 514–519.CrossRef
go back to reference Iacobucci, G. 2020. Row over Babylon’s chatbot shows lack of regulation. BMJ 368: m815.CrossRef Iacobucci, G. 2020. Row over Babylon’s chatbot shows lack of regulation. BMJ 368: m815.CrossRef
go back to reference Jimison, H.B., P.P. Sher, and J.J.B. Jimison. 2007. Decision support for patients. In Clinical decision support systems: Theory and practice, ed. E.S. Berner, 249–261. New York: Springer.CrossRef Jimison, H.B., P.P. Sher, and J.J.B. Jimison. 2007. Decision support for patients. In Clinical decision support systems: Theory and practice, ed. E.S. Berner, 249–261. New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Julien, H. 2008. Content analysis. In The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. 1&2, ed. L. Given, 120–121. Los Angeles: SAGE. Julien, H. 2008. Content analysis. In The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. 1&2, ed. L. Given, 120–121. Los Angeles: SAGE.
go back to reference Jutel, A., and D. Lupton. 2015. Digitizing diagnosis: A review of mobile applications in the diagnostic process. Diagnosis 2 (2): 89–96.CrossRef Jutel, A., and D. Lupton. 2015. Digitizing diagnosis: A review of mobile applications in the diagnostic process. Diagnosis 2 (2): 89–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Kao, C.K., and D.M. Liebovitz. 2017. Consumer mobile health apps: Current state, barriers, and future directions. PM & R : THe Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 9 (5s): S106–S115.CrossRef Kao, C.K., and D.M. Liebovitz. 2017. Consumer mobile health apps: Current state, barriers, and future directions. PM & R : THe Journal of Injury, Function, and Rehabilitation 9 (5s): S106–S115.CrossRef
go back to reference Klasnja, P., and W. Pratt. 2012. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 45 (1): 184–198.CrossRef Klasnja, P., and W. Pratt. 2012. Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 45 (1): 184–198.CrossRef
go back to reference Kramer, U. 2017. Selbstbestimmter Umgang mit Gesundheits-Apps. Über welche Kompetenzen müssen Verbraucher*innen verfügen? HiBiFo—Haushalt in Bildung Und Forschung 2: 16–30.CrossRef Kramer, U. 2017. Selbstbestimmter Umgang mit Gesundheits-Apps. Über welche Kompetenzen müssen Verbraucher*innen verfügen? HiBiFo—Haushalt in Bildung Und Forschung 2: 16–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Kuckartz, U. 2016. Qualitative text analysis. A guide to methods, practice and using software. London: SAGE. Kuckartz, U. 2016. Qualitative text analysis. A guide to methods, practice and using software. London: SAGE.
go back to reference Kuhn S, Jungmann S, Jungmann F. Künstliche Intelligenz für Ärzte und Patienten „Googeln“ war gestern. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2018; 115(26): A-1262 / B-1066 / C-1058. Kuhn S, Jungmann S, Jungmann F. Künstliche Intelligenz für Ärzte und Patienten „Googeln“ war gestern. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2018; 115(26): A-1262 / B-1066 / C-1058.
go back to reference Kujala, S., I. Hörhammer, R. Hänninen-Ervasti, and T. Heponiemi. 2020. Health professionals’ experiences of the benefits and challenges of online symptom checkers. Studies Health Technology Informatics 270: 966–970. Kujala, S., I. Hörhammer, R. Hänninen-Ervasti, and T. Heponiemi. 2020. Health professionals’ experiences of the benefits and challenges of online symptom checkers. Studies Health Technology Informatics 270: 966–970.
go back to reference Lanseng, E., and T.W. Andreassen. 2007. Electronic healthcare: A study of people’s readiness and attitude toward performing self-diagnosis. International Journal of Service Industry Management 18 (4): 394–417.CrossRef Lanseng, E., and T.W. Andreassen. 2007. Electronic healthcare: A study of people’s readiness and attitude toward performing self-diagnosis. International Journal of Service Industry Management 18 (4): 394–417.CrossRef
go back to reference Lupton, D., and A. Jutel. 2015. ‘It’s like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Social Science and Medicine 133: 128–135.CrossRef Lupton, D., and A. Jutel. 2015. ‘It’s like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Social Science and Medicine 133: 128–135.CrossRef
go back to reference Marcolino, M.S., J.A.Q. Oliveira, M. D’Agostino, A.L. Ribeiro, M.B.M. Alkmim, and D. Novillo-Ortiz. 2018. The impact of mHealth interventions: Systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6 (1): e23.CrossRef Marcolino, M.S., J.A.Q. Oliveira, M. D’Agostino, A.L. Ribeiro, M.B.M. Alkmim, and D. Novillo-Ortiz. 2018. The impact of mHealth interventions: Systematic review of systematic reviews. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6 (1): e23.CrossRef
go back to reference Marco-Ruiz, L., E. Bønes, E. de la Asunción, E. Gabarron, J.C. Aviles-Solis, E. Lee, et al. 2017. Combining multivariate statistics and the think-aloud protocol to assess Human-Computer Interaction barriers in symptom checkers. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 74: 104–122.CrossRef Marco-Ruiz, L., E. Bønes, E. de la Asunción, E. Gabarron, J.C. Aviles-Solis, E. Lee, et al. 2017. Combining multivariate statistics and the think-aloud protocol to assess Human-Computer Interaction barriers in symptom checkers. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 74: 104–122.CrossRef
go back to reference Merz, S., T. Bruni, and M. Bondio. 2018. Diagnose-Apps: Wenig Evidenz. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 115 (12): 522–524. Merz, S., T. Bruni, and M. Bondio. 2018. Diagnose-Apps: Wenig Evidenz. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 115 (12): 522–524.
go back to reference Meyer, A.N.D., T.D. Giardina, C. Spitzmueller, U. Shahid, T.M.T. Scott, and H. Singh. 2020. Patient perspectives on the usefulness of an artificial intelligence-assisted symptom checker: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (1): e14679.CrossRef Meyer, A.N.D., T.D. Giardina, C. Spitzmueller, U. Shahid, T.M.T. Scott, and H. Singh. 2020. Patient perspectives on the usefulness of an artificial intelligence-assisted symptom checker: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (1): e14679.CrossRef
go back to reference Millenson, M.L., J.L. Baldwin, L. Zipperer, and H. Singh. 2018. Beyond Dr. Google: The evidence on consumer-facing digital tools for diagnosis. Diagnosis 5 (3): 95–105.CrossRef Millenson, M.L., J.L. Baldwin, L. Zipperer, and H. Singh. 2018. Beyond Dr. Google: The evidence on consumer-facing digital tools for diagnosis. Diagnosis 5 (3): 95–105.CrossRef
go back to reference Miller, S., S. Gilbert, V. Virani, and P. Wicks. 2020. Patients’ utilization and perception of an artificial intelligence-based symptom assessment and advice technology in a British primary care waiting room: Exploratory pilot study. JMIR Human Factors 7 (3): e19713.CrossRef Miller, S., S. Gilbert, V. Virani, and P. Wicks. 2020. Patients’ utilization and perception of an artificial intelligence-based symptom assessment and advice technology in a British primary care waiting room: Exploratory pilot study. JMIR Human Factors 7 (3): e19713.CrossRef
go back to reference Mohapatra, D., M. Mohapatra, R. Chittoria, M. Friji, and S. Kumar. 2015. The scope of mobile devices in health care and medical education. International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research 2 (1): 3–8.CrossRef Mohapatra, D., M. Mohapatra, R. Chittoria, M. Friji, and S. Kumar. 2015. The scope of mobile devices in health care and medical education. International Journal of Advanced Medical and Health Research 2 (1): 3–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Morita, T., A. Rahman, T. Hasegawa, A. Ozaki, and T. Tanimoto. 2017. The potential possibility of symptom checker. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 6 (10): 615–616.CrossRef Morita, T., A. Rahman, T. Hasegawa, A. Ozaki, and T. Tanimoto. 2017. The potential possibility of symptom checker. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 6 (10): 615–616.CrossRef
go back to reference Morse, K.E., N.P. Ostberg, V.G. Jones, and A.S. Chan. 2020. Use characteristics and triage acuity of a digital symptom checker in a large integrated health system: Population-based descriptive study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (11): e20549.CrossRef Morse, K.E., N.P. Ostberg, V.G. Jones, and A.S. Chan. 2020. Use characteristics and triage acuity of a digital symptom checker in a large integrated health system: Population-based descriptive study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22 (11): e20549.CrossRef
go back to reference Mosa, A.S., I. Yoo, and L. Sheets. 2012. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12: 67.CrossRef Mosa, A.S., I. Yoo, and L. Sheets. 2012. A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 12: 67.CrossRef
go back to reference Nijland, N., K. Cranen, H. Boer, J. van Gemert-Pijnen, and E. Seydel. 2010. Patient use and compliance with medical advice delivered by a web-based triage system in primary care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 16 (1): 8–11.CrossRef Nijland, N., K. Cranen, H. Boer, J. van Gemert-Pijnen, and E. Seydel. 2010. Patient use and compliance with medical advice delivered by a web-based triage system in primary care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 16 (1): 8–11.CrossRef
go back to reference Peters, M.D., C.M. Godfrey, H. Khalil, P. McInerney, D. Parker, and C.B. Soares. 2015. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 13 (3): 141–146.CrossRef Peters, M.D., C.M. Godfrey, H. Khalil, P. McInerney, D. Parker, and C.B. Soares. 2015. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 13 (3): 141–146.CrossRef
go back to reference Razzaki S, Baker A, Perov Y, Middleton K, Baxter J, Mullarkey D, et al. 2018. A comparative study of artificial intelligence and human doctors for the purpose of triage and diagnosis. ARXIV. 2018. arXiv:1806.10698. Razzaki S, Baker A, Perov Y, Middleton K, Baxter J, Mullarkey D, et al. 2018. A comparative study of artificial intelligence and human doctors for the purpose of triage and diagnosis. ARXIV. 2018. arXiv:​1806.​10698.
go back to reference Rowland, S., E. Fitzgerald, T. Holme, J. Powell, and A. McGregor. 2020. What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients? NPJ Digital Medicine 3 (4): 1–6. Rowland, S., E. Fitzgerald, T. Holme, J. Powell, and A. McGregor. 2020. What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients? NPJ Digital Medicine 3 (4): 1–6.
go back to reference Ryan, A., and S. Wilson. 2008. Internet healthcare: Do self-diagnosis sites do more harm than good? Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 7 (3): 227–229.CrossRef Ryan, A., and S. Wilson. 2008. Internet healthcare: Do self-diagnosis sites do more harm than good? Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 7 (3): 227–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Schofield, G., M. Dittborn, L.E. Selman, and R. Huxtable. 2021. Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: A rapid review. BMC Medical Ethics 22: 135.CrossRef Schofield, G., M. Dittborn, L.E. Selman, and R. Huxtable. 2021. Defining ethical challenge(s) in healthcare research: A rapid review. BMC Medical Ethics 22: 135.CrossRef
go back to reference Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE. Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: SAGE.
go back to reference Shen, C., M. Nguyen, A. Gregor, G. Isaza, and A. Beattie. 2019. Accuracy of a popular online symptom checker for Ophthalmic diagnoses. JAMA Ophthalmology 137 (6): 690–692.CrossRef Shen, C., M. Nguyen, A. Gregor, G. Isaza, and A. Beattie. 2019. Accuracy of a popular online symptom checker for Ophthalmic diagnoses. JAMA Ophthalmology 137 (6): 690–692.CrossRef
go back to reference Smaling, A. 1992. Varieties of methodological intersubjectivity—the relations with qualitative and quantitative research, and with objectivity. Quality and Quantity 26 (2): 169–180.CrossRef Smaling, A. 1992. Varieties of methodological intersubjectivity—the relations with qualitative and quantitative research, and with objectivity. Quality and Quantity 26 (2): 169–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Sönnichsen A. 2019. Fluch oder Segen? Symptom Checker und Diagnostik-Apps. KVH-Journal. 2019 (9): 32–34. Sönnichsen A. 2019. Fluch oder Segen? Symptom Checker und Diagnostik-Apps. KVH-Journal. 2019 (9): 32–34.
go back to reference Thielscher, C., and G. Antes. 2019. Der Arzt behält die Deutungshoheit trotz KI. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 116 (1–2): 18–19. Thielscher, C., and G. Antes. 2019. Der Arzt behält die Deutungshoheit trotz KI. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 116 (1–2): 18–19.
go back to reference Tricco, A.C., E. Lillie, W. Zarin, K.K. O’Brien, H. Colquhoun, D. Levac, et al. 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 196 (7): 467–473.CrossRef Tricco, A.C., E. Lillie, W. Zarin, K.K. O’Brien, H. Colquhoun, D. Levac, et al. 2018. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 196 (7): 467–473.CrossRef
go back to reference Verzantvoort, N.C.M., T. Teunis, T.J.M. Verheij, and A.W. van der Velden. 2018. Self-triage for acute primary care via a smartphone application: Practical, safe and efficient? PLoS ONE 13 (6): e0199284.CrossRef Verzantvoort, N.C.M., T. Teunis, T.J.M. Verheij, and A.W. van der Velden. 2018. Self-triage for acute primary care via a smartphone application: Practical, safe and efficient? PLoS ONE 13 (6): e0199284.CrossRef
go back to reference Wattanapisit, A., C.H. Teo, S. Wattanapisit, E. Teoh, W.J. Woo, and C.J. Ng. 2020. Can mobile health apps replace GPs? A scoping review of comparisons between mobile apps and GP tasks. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 20 (1): 5.CrossRef Wattanapisit, A., C.H. Teo, S. Wattanapisit, E. Teoh, W.J. Woo, and C.J. Ng. 2020. Can mobile health apps replace GPs? A scoping review of comparisons between mobile apps and GP tasks. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 20 (1): 5.CrossRef
go back to reference Wetzel, A.J., R. Koch, C. Preiser, R. Müller, M. Klemmt, R. Ranisch, H.J. Ehni, U. Wiesing, M.A. Rieger, T. Henking, and S. Joos. 2022. Ethical, legal, and social implications of symptom checker apps in primary health care (CHECK.APP): Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Research Protocols 11 (5): e34026.CrossRef Wetzel, A.J., R. Koch, C. Preiser, R. Müller, M. Klemmt, R. Ranisch, H.J. Ehni, U. Wiesing, M.A. Rieger, T. Henking, and S. Joos. 2022. Ethical, legal, and social implications of symptom checker apps in primary health care (CHECK.APP): Protocol for an Interdisciplinary Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Research Protocols 11 (5): e34026.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ethical, legal, and social aspects of symptom checker applications: a scoping review
Authors
Regina Müller
Malte Klemmt
Hans-Jörg Ehni
Tanja Henking
Angelina Kuhnmünch
Christine Preiser
Roland Koch
Robert Ranisch
Publication date
01-10-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10114-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4/2022 Go to the issue