Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2/2017

01-06-2017 | Editorial

Publication ethics: science versus commerce

Authors: Henk ten Have, Bert Gordijn

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

One of our students submitted a manuscript to the International Journal of Philosophy and Theology. This is a prestigious peer-reviewed journal, founded in 1938 by Jesuit Academics at the University of Louvain in Belgium. Initially a Dutch language journal, Bijdragen, it was internationalized in 2013 and is now published by Taylor and Francis (http://​www.​tandfonline.​com/​toc/​rjpt20/​current). Within a few weeks our student received a message from the journal that his contribution had been reviewed and accepted: the topic was relevant, the methodology sound, and the relevant literature engaged. His manuscript could be published rather quickly. As soon as the publication had materialized, the student received an invoice of $200 to be paid to a bank account in Bangladesh. Another student who had presented a paper during a conference in Cyprus told us that immediately after the conference she received an email from the Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics (https://​www.​omicsonline.​org/​clinical-research-bioethics.​php) inviting her to submit the text of her presentation. She was of course flattered, and in her innocence she had submitted her text. We advised her to withdraw the manuscript as soon as possible, but in that case she might face a retraction fee. …
Literature
go back to reference Abbott, J.H. 2017. How to choose where to publish your work. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 47: 6–10.CrossRef Abbott, J.H. 2017. How to choose where to publish your work. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 47: 6–10.CrossRef
go back to reference Beall, J. 2016. Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. Journal of Korean Medical Science 31: 1511–1513.CrossRef Beall, J. 2016. Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. Journal of Korean Medical Science 31: 1511–1513.CrossRef
go back to reference Beall, J. 2017. Predatory journals threaten the quality of published medical research. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 47 (1): 3–5.CrossRef Beall, J. 2017. Predatory journals threaten the quality of published medical research. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 47 (1): 3–5.CrossRef
go back to reference Carroll, C.W. 2016. Spotting the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Predatory open access publications. The Journal of Graduate Medical Education 8 (5): 662–664.CrossRef Carroll, C.W. 2016. Spotting the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Predatory open access publications. The Journal of Graduate Medical Education 8 (5): 662–664.CrossRef
go back to reference Cook, C. 2017. Predatory journals: The worst thing in publishing, ever. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 47 (1): 1–2.CrossRef Cook, C. 2017. Predatory journals: The worst thing in publishing, ever. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 47 (1): 1–2.CrossRef
go back to reference Dadkhah, M., and G. Bianciardi, 2016. Ranking predatory journals: Solve the problem instead of removing it! Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin 6 (1): 1–4.CrossRef Dadkhah, M., and G. Bianciardi, 2016. Ranking predatory journals: Solve the problem instead of removing it! Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin 6 (1): 1–4.CrossRef
go back to reference Dadkhah, M., T. Maliszewski, and M.D. Jazi. 2016. Characteristics of hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Out observations in the academic world. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 37 (6): 415–418.CrossRef Dadkhah, M., T. Maliszewski, and M.D. Jazi. 2016. Characteristics of hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Out observations in the academic world. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 37 (6): 415–418.CrossRef
go back to reference Dadkhah, M., S.E.H. Seno, and G. Borchardt. 2017. Current and potential cyber attacks on medical journals: Guidelines for improving security. European Journal of Internal Medicine 38: 25–29.CrossRef Dadkhah, M., S.E.H. Seno, and G. Borchardt. 2017. Current and potential cyber attacks on medical journals: Guidelines for improving security. European Journal of Internal Medicine 38: 25–29.CrossRef
go back to reference Danevska, L., M. Spiroski, D. Donev, N. Pop-Jordanova, and M. Polenakovic. 2016. How to recognize and avoid potential, possible, or probable predatory open-access publishers, standalone, and hijacked journals. Contributions, Section of Medical Sciences 37 (2–3): 5–13. Danevska, L., M. Spiroski, D. Donev, N. Pop-Jordanova, and M. Polenakovic. 2016. How to recognize and avoid potential, possible, or probable predatory open-access publishers, standalone, and hijacked journals. Contributions, Section of Medical Sciences 37 (2–3): 5–13.
go back to reference Ekmekci, P.E. 2017. An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors’ role in avoiding it. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9767-0 Ekmekci, P.E. 2017. An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors’ role in avoiding it. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. doi:10.​1007/​s11019-017-9767-0
go back to reference Eriksson, S., and G. Helgesson. 2017. The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. Eriksson, S., and G. Helgesson. 2017. The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.
go back to reference Gasparyan, A.Y., B. Nurmashev, A.A. Voronov, A.N. Gerasimov, A.M. Koroleva, and G.D. Kitas. 2016. The pressure to publish more and the scope of predatory publishing activities. Journal of Korean Medical Science 31: 1874–1878.CrossRef Gasparyan, A.Y., B. Nurmashev, A.A. Voronov, A.N. Gerasimov, A.M. Koroleva, and G.D. Kitas. 2016. The pressure to publish more and the scope of predatory publishing activities. Journal of Korean Medical Science 31: 1874–1878.CrossRef
go back to reference Harvey, H.B., and D.F. Weinstein. 2017. Predatory publishing: An emerging threat to the medical literature. Academic Medicine 92: 150–151.CrossRef Harvey, H.B., and D.F. Weinstein. 2017. Predatory publishing: An emerging threat to the medical literature. Academic Medicine 92: 150–151.CrossRef
go back to reference Kumar, P., and D. Saxena. 2016. Pandemic of publications and predatory journals: Another nail in the coffin of academics. Indian J Community Medicine 41 (3): 169–171.CrossRef Kumar, P., and D. Saxena. 2016. Pandemic of publications and predatory journals: Another nail in the coffin of academics. Indian J Community Medicine 41 (3): 169–171.CrossRef
go back to reference Shahriari, N., J.M. Grant-Kels, and M.J. Payette. 2016. Predatory journals: How to recognize and avoid the threat of involvement with these unethical “publishers”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 75: 658–659.CrossRef Shahriari, N., J.M. Grant-Kels, and M.J. Payette. 2016. Predatory journals: How to recognize and avoid the threat of involvement with these unethical “publishers”. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 75: 658–659.CrossRef
go back to reference Shamseer, L., D. Moher, O. Maduekwe, L. Turner, V. Barbour, R. Burch, J. Clark, J. Galipeau, J. Roberts, and B.J. Shea. 2017. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine 15: 28. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.CrossRef Shamseer, L., D. Moher, O. Maduekwe, L. Turner, V. Barbour, R. Burch, J. Clark, J. Galipeau, J. Roberts, and B.J. Shea. 2017. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine 15: 28. doi:10.​1186/​s12916-017-0785-9.CrossRef
go back to reference Singer, A. 2017. Not all young journals are predatory. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 18 (2): 318–321.CrossRef Singer, A. 2017. Not all young journals are predatory. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine 18 (2): 318–321.CrossRef
go back to reference Sperling, D. 2017. (Re)disclosing physician financial interests: Rebuilding trust or making unreasonable burdens on physicians? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9751-8. Sperling, D. 2017. (Re)disclosing physician financial interests: Rebuilding trust or making unreasonable burdens on physicians? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. doi:10.​1007/​s11019-017-9751-8.
go back to reference Watson, R. 2017. Beall’s list of predatory open access journals: RIP. Nursing Open 4 (2): 60.CrossRef Watson, R. 2017. Beall’s list of predatory open access journals: RIP. Nursing Open 4 (2): 60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Publication ethics: science versus commerce
Authors
Henk ten Have
Bert Gordijn
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9774-1

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2/2017 Go to the issue

Short literature notices

Short literature notices