Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1/2010

01-02-2010 | Scientific Contribution

Humanized birth in high risk pregnancy: barriers and facilitating factors

Authors: Roxana Behruzi, Marie Hatem, Lise Goulet, William Fraser, Nicole Leduc, Chizuru Misago

Published in: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

The medical model of childbearing assumes that a pregnancy always has the potential to turn into a risky procedure. In order to advocate humanized birth in high risk pregnancy, an important step involves the enlightenment of the professional’s preconceptions on humanized birth in such a situation. The goal of this paper is to identify the professionals’ perception of the potential obstacles and facilitating factors for the implementation of humanized care in high risk pregnancies. Twenty-one midwives, obstetricians, and health administrator professionals from the clinical and academic fields were interviewed in nine different sites in Japan from June through August 2008. The interviews were audio taped, and transcribed with the participants’ consent. Data was subsequently analyzed using content analysis qualitative methods. Professionals concurred with the concept that humanized birth is a changing and promising process, and can often bring normality to the midst of a high obstetric risk situation. No practice guidelines can be theoretically defined for humanized birth in a high risk pregnancy, as there is no conflict between humanized birth and medical intervention in such a situation. Barriers encountered in providing humanized birth in a high risk pregnancy include factors such as: the pressure of being responsible for the safety of the mother and the fetus, lack of the women’s active involvement in the decision making process and the heavy burden of responsibility on the physician’s shoulders, potential legal issues, and finally, the lack of midwifery authority in providing care at high risk pregnancy. The factors that facilitate humanized birth in a high risk include: the sharing of decision making and other various responsibilities between the physicians and the women; being caring; stress management, and the fact that the evolution of a better relationship and communication between the health professional and the patient will lead to a stress-free environment for both. Humanized birth in a high risk pregnancy is something that goes beyond just curing women of their illnesses. It can be considered as a token of caring, and continued support, which positively consolidates the doctor-patient relationship. As yet, it has not been described as a practiced guideline, due to its ever-changing complexities.
Footnotes
1
The original guide of interview was used in the first author’s PhD project entitled: “Humanized Child birth in Highly Specialized Hospitals in Quebec—Canada” (2007).
 
2
A program which is designed to analyse qualitative data in an accurate and scientific way.
 
3
Part of Dr. Misago’s previous interviews about humanized birth.
 
Literature
go back to reference Béhague, D.P. 2002. Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: Women’s resistance to social inequality. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 26 (4): 473–507.CrossRefPubMed Béhague, D.P. 2002. Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: Women’s resistance to social inequality. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 26 (4): 473–507.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berg, M., and K. Dahlberg. 1998. A phenomenological study of women’s experiences of complicated childbirth. Midwifery 14 (1): 23–29.CrossRefPubMed Berg, M., and K. Dahlberg. 1998. A phenomenological study of women’s experiences of complicated childbirth. Midwifery 14 (1): 23–29.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berg, M., and K. Dahlberg. 2001. Swedish midwives’ care of women who are at high obstetric risk or who have obstetric complications. Midwifery 17 (4): 259–266.CrossRefPubMed Berg, M., and K. Dahlberg. 2001. Swedish midwives’ care of women who are at high obstetric risk or who have obstetric complications. Midwifery 17 (4): 259–266.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Clauson, M.I. 1996. Uncertainty and stress in women hospitalized with high-risk pregnancy. Clinical Nursing Research 5 (3): 309–325.CrossRefPubMed Clauson, M.I. 1996. Uncertainty and stress in women hospitalized with high-risk pregnancy. Clinical Nursing Research 5 (3): 309–325.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Crabtree, B.F., and W.L. Miller. 1999. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Crabtree, B.F., and W.L. Miller. 1999. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Gairing Bürglin, A., and S. Tschudin. 2008. Communication in obstetrics. Therapeutische Umschau 65 (11): 653–656.CrossRefPubMed Gairing Bürglin, A., and S. Tschudin. 2008. Communication in obstetrics. Therapeutische Umschau 65 (11): 653–656.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gupton, A., M. Heaman, et al. 2001. Complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies: women’s perception of risk. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 30 (2): 192–201.CrossRefPubMed Gupton, A., M. Heaman, et al. 2001. Complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies: women’s perception of risk. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 30 (2): 192–201.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hausman, B.L. 2005. Risky business: Framing childbirth in hospital settings. Journal of Medical Humanities 26 (1): 23–38.CrossRefPubMed Hausman, B.L. 2005. Risky business: Framing childbirth in hospital settings. Journal of Medical Humanities 26 (1): 23–38.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heaman, M., J. Beaton, et al. 1992. A comparison of childbirth expectations in high-risk and low-risk pregnant women. Clinical Nursing Research 1 (3): 252–265.CrossRefPubMed Heaman, M., J. Beaton, et al. 1992. A comparison of childbirth expectations in high-risk and low-risk pregnant women. Clinical Nursing Research 1 (3): 252–265.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hsieh, H.F., and S.E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMed Hsieh, H.F., and S.E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Irland, N.B. 2007. Using labor and birth to understand grief. Nursing for Women’s Health 11 (5): 524–530.CrossRefPubMed Irland, N.B. 2007. Using labor and birth to understand grief. Nursing for Women’s Health 11 (5): 524–530.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Levy-Shiff, R., M. Lerman, et al. 2002. Maternal adjustment and infant outcome in medically defined high-risk pregnancy. Developmental Psychology 38 (1): 93–103.PubMedCrossRef Levy-Shiff, R., M. Lerman, et al. 2002. Maternal adjustment and infant outcome in medically defined high-risk pregnancy. Developmental Psychology 38 (1): 93–103.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lindsay, P. 2006. Creating normality in a high risk pregnancy. The Practising Midwife 9 (1): 17–20. Lindsay, P. 2006. Creating normality in a high risk pregnancy. The Practising Midwife 9 (1): 17–20.
go back to reference McCreight, B.S. 2008. Perinatal loss: A qualitative study in Northern Ireland. Omega (Westport) 57 (1): 1–19. McCreight, B.S. 2008. Perinatal loss: A qualitative study in Northern Ireland. Omega (Westport) 57 (1): 1–19.
go back to reference Medina, R.F., and V.M. Backes. 2002. Humanism in the care of surgery patients. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 55 (5): 522–527.PubMed Medina, R.F., and V.M. Backes. 2002. Humanism in the care of surgery patients. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 55 (5): 522–527.PubMed
go back to reference Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
go back to reference Smeenk, A.D.J., and H.A.M.J. ten Have. 2003. Medicalization and obstetric care: An analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 6 (2): 153–165.CrossRefPubMed Smeenk, A.D.J., and H.A.M.J. ten Have. 2003. Medicalization and obstetric care: An analysis of developments in Dutch midwifery. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 6 (2): 153–165.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Stainton, M.C. 1994. Supporting family functioning during a high-risk pregnancy. MCN, The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 19 (1): 24–28.CrossRef Stainton, M.C. 1994. Supporting family functioning during a high-risk pregnancy. MCN, The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing 19 (1): 24–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Vila Vda, S., and L. A. Rossi. 2002. Cultural meaning of humanized care at intensive care units: Lots of words, little action. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 10 (2): 137–144.PubMed Vila Vda, S., and L. A. Rossi. 2002. Cultural meaning of humanized care at intensive care units: Lots of words, little action. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem 10 (2): 137–144.PubMed
go back to reference Wagner, M. 2001. Fish can’t see water: The need to humanize birth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 75: S25–S37.CrossRef Wagner, M. 2001. Fish can’t see water: The need to humanize birth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 75: S25–S37.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Humanized birth in high risk pregnancy: barriers and facilitating factors
Authors
Roxana Behruzi
Marie Hatem
Lise Goulet
William Fraser
Nicole Leduc
Chizuru Misago
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1386-7423
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8633
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-009-9220-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1/2010 Go to the issue