Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2015

01-05-2015

Pregnancy Intentions and Maternal and Child Health: An Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Oklahoma

Authors: Laura Lindberg, Isaac Maddow-Zimet, Kathryn Kost, Alicia Lincoln

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Better understanding of the impact of unintended childbearing on infant and early childhood health is needed for public health practice and policy. Data from the 2004–2008 Oklahoma Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System survey and The Oklahoma Toddler Survey 2006–2010 were used to examine associations between a four category measure of pregnancy intentions (intended, mistimed <2 years, mistimed ≥2 years, unwanted) and maternal behaviors and child health outcomes up to age two. Propensity score methods were used to control for confounding. Births mistimed by two or more years (OR .58) and unwanted births (OR .33) had significantly lower odds than intended births of having a mother who recognized the pregnancy within the first 8 weeks; they were also about half as likely as intended births to receive early prenatal care, and had significantly higher likelihoods of exposure to cigarette smoke during pregnancy. Breastfeeding was significantly less likely among unwanted births (OR .68); breastfeeding for at least 6 months was significantly less likely among seriously mistimed births (OR .70). We find little association between intention status and early childhood measures. Measured associations of intention status on health behaviors and outcomes were most evident in the prenatal period, limited in the immediate prenatal period, and mostly insignificant by age two. In addition, most of the negative associations between intention status and health outcomes were concentrated among women with births mistimed by two or more years or unwanted births. Surveys should incorporate questions on the extent of mistiming when measuring pregnancy intentions.
Footnotes
1
Oklahoma is one of only four states with data available from follow-up interviews of PRAMS mothers; the others are Alaska, Rhode Island, and Oregon.
 
2
Only one other state (Utah) included such a question in the PRAMS survey during the same period.
 
3
Response categories were less than 1 year, 1 year to less than 2 years, 2 years to less than 3 years, 3 years to less than 4 years, 4 years or more.
 
4
Mothers slightly overestimate early entry into prenatal care on the PRAMS survey (Oklahoma State Department of Health, PRAMSGRAM Initiation of Prenatal Care Among Women Having a Live Birth in Oklahoma, 1995, 5(2) http://​www.​ok.​gov/​health2/​documents/​PRAMS_​Initiation%20​of%20​PNC_​95.​pdf.​pdf, accessed 11/21/13); however, these small overestimates are unlikely to affect our final estimates substantially.
 
5
This measure was drawn from the linked birth certificate.
 
6
Defined as diarrhea lasting at least 3 days, an ear infection, or a cold or runny nose with a fever or cough.
 
7
Paired comparisons of differences in the size of the proportions for intention status groups for individual attributes were tested for statistical significance using t tests. Only statistically significant differences are mentioned in the text (p < .05).
 
Literature
1.
Institute of Medicine. (2011). Clinical preventive services for women: Closing the gaps. Report of the Committee on Preventive Services for Women. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
2.
3.
Gipson, J. D., Koenig, M. A., & Hindin, M. J. (2008). The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning, 39(1), 18–38.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Logan, C., Holcombe, E., Manlove, J., & Ryan, S. (2007). The consequences of unintended childbearing: A white paper. Washington, DC: Child Trends and The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.
5.
Joyce, T. J., Kaestner, R., & Korenman, S. (2000). The effect of pregnancy intention on child development. Demography, 37(1), 83–94.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Baydar, N. (1995). Consequences for children of their birth planning status. Family Planning Perspectives, 27(6), 228–34, 245.
7.
Crissey, S. R. (2005). Effect of pregnancy intention on child well-being and development: Combining retrospective reports of attitude and contraceptive use. Population Research and Policy Review, 24(6), 593–615.CrossRef
8.
Carson, C., et al. (2011). Effect of pregnancy planning and fertility treatment on cognitive outcomes in children at ages 3 and 5: Longitudinal cohort study. British Medical Journal, 343, d4473.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Hummer, R. A., Hack, K. A., & Raley, R. K. (2004). Retrospective reports of pregnancy wantedness and child well-being in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 25(3), 404–428.CrossRef
10.
11.
Rosenberg, K. D., et al. (2011). New options for child health surveillance by state health departments. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(3), 302–309.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Santelli, J., et al. (2003). The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(2), 94–101.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Klerman, L. V. (2000). The intendedness of pregnancy: A concept in transition. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 4(3), 155–162.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Pulley, L., Klerman, L. V., Tang, H., & Baker, B. A. (2002). The extent of pregnancy mistiming and its association with maternal characteristics and behaviors and pregnancy outcomes. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34(4), 206–211.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Mosher, W. D., Jones, J., & Abma, J. C. (2012). Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982–2010. Hyattsville, MD: National Center of Health Statistics.
16.
Lindberg, L. D., Finer, L. B., & Stokes-Prindle, C. (2008). Refining measures of pregnancy intention: Taking timing into account. In 2008 Annual meetings of the Population Association of America. New Orleans, LA.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Oklahoma State Department of Health. (2012). TOTS 2012 protocol. Unpublished manuscript available upon request at TOTS@health.ok.gov.
21.
Singh, G., Siahpush, M., & Kogan, M. D. (2010). Disparities in children’s exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in the United States, 2007. Pediatrics, 126(5), 1052.
22.
Hagan, J. F., Shaw, J. S., & Duncan, P. M. (Eds.). (2008). Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents (3rd ed.). Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.
23.
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRef
24.
Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(3), 399–424.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
25.
26.
Imbens, G. W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose–response functions. Biometrika, 87(3), 706–710.CrossRef
27.
Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
28.
Lunceford, J. K., & Davidian, M. (2004). Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: A comparative study. Statistics in Medicine, 23(19), 2937–2960.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Dugoff, E. H., Schuler, M., & Stuart, E. A. (2013). Generalizing observational study results: Applying propensity score methods to complex surveys. Health Services Research, 49(1), 284–303.
30.
Sonfield, A., & Kost, K. (2013). Public costs from unintended pregnancies and the role of public insurance programs in paying for pregnancy and infant care: Estimates for 2008. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
31.
Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, K. B. (2010). Age, relationship status, and the planning status of births. Demographic Research, 23(13), 365–398.CrossRef
32.
D’Angelo, D. V., et al. (2004). Differences between mistimed and unwanted pregnancies among women who have live births. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36(5), 192–197.CrossRefPubMed
33.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Gynecologic Practice & Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. (2009). Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 114(6), 1434–1438.CrossRef
34.
Speidel, J. J., Harper, C. C., & Shields, W. C. (2008). The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy. Contraception, 78(3), 197–200.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Baldwin, M. K., Rodriguez, M. I., & Edelman, A. B. (2012). Lack of insurance and parity influence choice between long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in women postpregnancy. Contraception, 86(1), 42–47.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Braveman, P., & Barclay, C. (2009). Health disparities beginning in childhood: A life-course perspective. Pediatrics, 124(Suppl 3), S163–S175.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Shah, P. S., et al. (2011). Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: A systematic review. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(2), 205–216.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Durousseau, S., & Chavez, G. F. (2003). Associations of intrauterine growth restriction among term infants and maternal pregnancy intendedness, initial happiness about being pregnant, and sense of control. Pediatrics, 111(5 Part 2), 1171–1175.PubMed
39.
Kost, K., Landry, D. L., & Darroch, J. E. (1998). The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care. Family Planning Perspectives, 30(5), 223–230.CrossRefPubMed
40.
McCrory, C., & McNally, S. (2013). The effect of pregnancy intention on maternal prenatal behaviours and parent and child health: Results of an Irish cohort study. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 27(2), 208–215.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
Joyce, T., Kaestner, R., & Korenman, S. (2000). The stability of pregnancy intentions and pregnancy-related maternal behaviors. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 4(3), 171–178.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Lewis, C. C., Pantell, R. H., & Kieckhefer, G. M. (1989). Assessment of children’s health status: Field test of new approaches. Medical Care, 27(Suppl. 3), S54–S65.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Metadata
Title
Pregnancy Intentions and Maternal and Child Health: An Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Oklahoma
Authors
Laura Lindberg
Isaac Maddow-Zimet
Kathryn Kost
Alicia Lincoln
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1609-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2015 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Stress, Sleep, Depression and Dietary Intakes Among Low-Income Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women

OriginalPaper

Month-Wise Estimates of Tobacco Smoking During Pregnancy for the United States, 2002–2009

OriginalPaper

I Am Pregnant and Want to Do Better But I Can’t: Focus Groups with Low-Income Overweight and Obese Pregnant Women

OriginalPaper

Neighborhood Deprivation and Maternal Psychological Distress During Pregnancy: A Multilevel Analysis

Methodological Notes

Variation in Pregnancy Intendedness Across U.S. Women’s Pregnancies

OriginalPaper

Factors Associated with Breastfeeding Duration and Exclusivity in Mothers Returning to Paid Employment Postpartum