Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 3/2014

01-04-2014

Securing the Safety Net: Concurrent Participation in Income Eligible Assistance Programs

Authors: Danielle Gilbert, Joy Nanda, David Paige

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Participation in women, infants and children (WIC), supplemental nutritional assistance program (SNAP), temporary assistance for needy families (TANF), and medical assistance program (MAP) programs provide critical nutrition and health benefits to low-income families. Concurrent enrollment in these programs provides a powerful safety net, yet simultaneous participation is reported to be low. Underutilization undermines program objectives, client well-being and food security. This paper examines concurrent participation among the most needy WIC clients, those at/below 100 % of the federal poverty level (FPL), in SNAP, TANF and MAP. We examined the Maryland state WIC program infant electronic database (N = 34,409) for the 12-month period ending September 2010. Our analysis focused on two-thirds of these infants (N = 23,065) who were at/below the 100 % FPL. Mothers’ mean age was 26.8 ± 6 years; 20.6 % White; 52.7 % African American, and 23.4 % Hispanic. Approximately 10 % of infants weighed <2,500 g and 1.5 % weighed <1,500 g at birth. Average household income was $10,160; 55.7 % were at/below 50 % FPL. Two-thirds (68.4 %) participated in MAP, 31 % in SNAP and 9 % in TANF. Only 8 % were enrolled in all three programs whereas 28 % were not enrolled in any. There was a statistically significant difference in mean age and household income between multi-program beneficiaries and mothers who solely participated in WIC: 25.6 ± 5 years and $7,298 ± $4,496 compared with 27.2 ± 6 years and $12,216 ± $6,920, respectively (p < 0.001). Among WIC families at or below 100 % FPL, only 8 % received multi-program benefits. Specific factors responsible for participation on an individual level are not available. To optimize enrollment, a coordinated effort is essential to identify and overcome barriers to concurrent participation among these families.
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
Food Research and Action Center. (2009). Maryland: Demographics, poverty, and food insecurity. Maryland: FRAC.
5.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2007). Maryland: Medicaid Facts. AAP.
6.
Douglas-Hall, A., & Chau, M. (2007). Basic facts about low-income children: Birth to age 3. National Center for Children in Poverty. New York, NY.
7.
Shonkoff, J., & Phillips, D. A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8.
Center on the Developing Child. (2007). A science-based framework for early childhood policy: Using evidence to improve outcomes in learning, behavior, and health for vulnerable children. Boston, MA: Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University.
9.
Woelfel, M. L., et al. (2004). Barriers to the use of WIC services. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104(5), 736–743.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Tiehen, L., & Jacknowitz, A. (2008). Oct Why Wait? Examining delayed WIC participation among pregnant women. Contemporary Economic Policy, 26(4), 518–538.CrossRef
11.
Jacknowitz, A., & Tiehen, L. (2009). Transitions into and out of the WIC program, a cause for concern? Social Service Review, 83(2), 151–183.CrossRef
12.
13.
Christie, C., et al. (2006). Assessment of client satisfaction in six urban WIC clinics. Florida Public Health Review, 3, 35–42.
14.
Zambrana, R. E. et al. (2004). Drawing from the data: Working effectively with Latino families: A guide for health and family support practitioners. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics and Chicago, IL: Family Support America.
15.
Flores, G., et al. (2002). The health of latino children: Urgent priorities, unanswered questions, and a research Agenda. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 82–89.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Flores, G., & Zambrana, R. E. (2001). The early years: Latino children and youth. In M. Aguirre-Molina, C. Molina, & R. E. Zambrana (Eds.), Health issues in the Latino community. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
DeVoe, J. E., et al. (2012). Why do some eligible families forego public insurance for their children? A qualitative analysis. Family Medicine, 44(1), 39–46.PubMed
18.
Kempe, A., et al. (2001). Barriers to enrollment in a state child health insurance program. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1(3), 169–177.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Newborn Enrollment Project of Maternal and Child Health Access Stakeholder Meeting. Strategies for improving the Medi-Cal newborn enrollment process, April 2002, Los Angeles, California.
20.
Salsberry, P. J. (2003). Why are some children still uninsured? Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 17(1), 32–38.PubMed
21.
Remler, D. K., & Glied, S. A. (2003). What other programs can teach us: Increasing participation in health insurance programs. American Journal of Public Health, 93(1), 67–74.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
22.
Kenney, G., & Haley, J. (2001). Why aren’t more children enrolled in Medicaid and SCHIP?. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
23.
Hernandez, D. C., et al. (2009). Association with stability and change in food stamp program participation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30(4), 357–371.CrossRef
24.
Arnold, A., et al. (2001). Understanding and improving the food stamp program in California: A primer and policy guide for advocates. San Francisco, CA: California Food Policy Advocates.
25.
Food Insecurity. Los Angeles, CA: County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services. March, 2004.
26.
Mills, B., et al. (2001). Determinants of food stamp program exits. Social Service Review, 75(4), 539–558.CrossRef
27.
Martin, K. S., et al. (2003). Public versus private food assistance: Barriers to participation differ by age and ethnicity. Journal of Nutrition Education Behavior, 35(5), 249–254.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Algert, S., Reibel, M., & Renvali, M. J. (2008). Barriers to participation in the food stamp program among food pantry clients in Los Angeles. American Journal of Public Health, 96(5), 807–809.CrossRef
29.
Lindhorst, T., & Mancoske, R. J. (2006). The social and economic impact of sanctions and time limits on recipients of temporary assistance to needy families. Journal of Social Welfare, 33(1), 93–114.
30.
Pati, S., et al. (2010). Influence of maternal health literacy on child participation in social welfare programs: The Philadelphia experience. American Journal of Public Health, 100(9), 1662–1665.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
31.
Stuber, J., & Kronebusch, K. (2004). Stigma and other determinants of participation in TANF and medicaid. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 509–530.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ross, D. C., & Hill, I. T. (2003). Enrolling eligible children and keeping them enrolled. Future of Children, 13(1), 81–97.CrossRefPubMed
33.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (June, 1998). Report to the president from the Interagency Task Force on Children’s Health Outreach. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
34.
Cousineau, M. R., et al. (2011). Measuring the impact of outreach and enrollment strategies for public health insurance in California. Health Services Research, 46(1 Pt 2), 319–335.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
35.
Andrulis, D. P., et al. (1999). Strategies to increase enrollment in children’s health insurance programs: A report of the New York Academy of Medicine. Journal of Urban Health, 76(2), 247–279.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
36.
Newacheck, P. W. (1998). Health insurance and access to primary care for children. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(8), 513–519.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Medicaid: president to unveil enrollment initiative. American Health Line; June 22, 1998.
38.
Zambrana, R. E., & Carter-Pokras, O. (2004). Improving health insurance coverage for Latino children: A review of barriers, challenges and state strategies. Journal of the National Medical Association, 96(4), 508–523.PubMedCentralPubMed
39.
Sarnoff, R., & Hughes, D. (2005). Increasing health insurance coverage in the first year of life. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9(4), 343–350.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Perry, M. et al. (January 2000). Medicaid and children overcoming barriers to enrollment findings from a national survey. The Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.
41.
Newborn Enrollment Project of Maternal and Child Health Access Stakeholder Meeting. Strategies for improving the Medi-Cal newborn enrollment process, April 2002, Los Angeles, California.
42.
Carpenter, M. B., & Kavanagh, L. (1998). Outreach to children: Moving from enrollment to ensuring access. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health.
43.
Cross-Barnet, C. (2010). Redefining relationships: Non-marriage-based cohabitations among low-income urban mothers. Dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
44.
Bornstein, M., et al. (2006). Maternal chronological age, prenatal and perinatal history, social support, and parenting of infants. Child Development, 77(4), 875–892.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Jaffee, S. R., et al. (2001). Predicting early fatherhood and whether young fathers live with their children: Prospective findings and policy reconsiderations. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 803–815.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Feinberg, E., et al. (2002). Language proficiency and the enrollment of medicaid-eligible children in publicly funded health insurance programs. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 6(1), 5–18.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Elder, J. P., et al. (2009). Health communication in the Latino community: Issues and approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 30, 227–251.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Securing the Safety Net: Concurrent Participation in Income Eligible Assistance Programs
Authors
Danielle Gilbert
Joy Nanda
David Paige
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-013-1281-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Maternal and Child Health Journal 3/2014 Go to the issue

ReviewPaper

Maintenance of Smoking Cessation in the Postpartum Period: Which Interventions Work Best in the Long-Term?

OriginalPaper

Congenital Cytomegalovirus Reference Material: A Content Analysis of Coverage and Accuracy

Brief Report

Effects of Pre-pregnancy Obesity, Race/Ethnicity and Prematurity

OriginalPaper

Intimate Partner Violence and Breastfeeding in Africa

OriginalPaper

Exploring U.S. Men’s Birth Intentions

OriginalPaper

Factors Related to Receipt of Well-Child Visits in Insured Children