Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-10-2013

UpStart Parent Survey: A New Psychometrically Valid Tool for the Evaluation of Prevention-focused Parenting Programs

Authors: Karen Benzies, Dawn Clarke, Leslie Barker, Richelle Mychasiuk

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 8/2013

Abstract

Parents are the most significant influence on the growth and development of young children. All parents can increase their knowledge of developmental milestones and parenting practices by participating in effective programs that offer information and support. However, there is limited outcome evaluation of programs offering these services. Prevention-focused parenting programs (P-FPPs) are key frontline services designed to educate parents and improve the overall well-being of children. Evaluation of these programs is currently weak; this is not to say they are ineffective, rather that their effectiveness has been poorly evaluated. Rigorous evaluation of P-FPPs would support informed funding and evidence-based policy decisions. The purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary psychometric analysis of the UpStart Parent Survey (USPS)—a tool developed specifically for evaluating this type of program. Preliminary analysis revealed uni-dimensionality of each scale, strong internal consistency and temporal stability, as well as strong concurrent validity on 9 of the 11 items examined with an urban Canadian population. In its first round of psychometric evaluation, the USPS demonstrated promise as a brief, easy to administer, scientifically rigorous tool for the evaluation of prevention-focused parenting programs.

McLennan, J. D., MacMillan, H. L., & Jamieson, E. (2004). Canada’s programs to prevent mental health problems in children: The research practice gap. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 171(9), 1069–1071.PubMedCrossRef

McLennan, J. D., & Lavis, J. N. (2006). What is the evidence for parenting interventions offered in a Canadian Community? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 97(6), 454–458.PubMed

Karoly, L. A., Kilburn, M. R., & Bigelow, J. H., et al. (2001). Assessing costs and benefits of early childhood intervention programs: Overview and application to the Starting Early Starting Smart Program. Executive Summary. Seattle, WA: Casey Family Programs.

Temple, J. A., & Reynolds, A. J. (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child–Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26, 126–144.CrossRef

National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2010). The foundations of lifelong health are built in early childhood. Boston, MA: Center on the Developing Child at Harvard University.

Rikhy, S., Tough, S., Trute, B., et al. (2010). Gauging knowledge of developmental milestones among Albertan adults: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 183–191. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-183.PubMedCrossRef

Benzies, K., & Mychasiuk, R. (2009). Fostering family resiliency: A review of the key protective factors. Child & Family Social Work, 14, 103–114. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00586.x.CrossRef

Benzies, K., Trute, B., & Worthington, C., et al. (2010) Assessing psychological well-being in mothers of children with disabilities: Evaluation of the Parenting Morale Index and Family Impact of Childhood Disability Scale. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. Advanced Access: September 15, 2010.

Bloomfield, L., & Kendall, S. (2007). Testing a parenting programme evaluation tool as a pre- and post-course measure of parenting self-efficacy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 487–493.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Abidin, R. R. (1997). Parenting Stress Index: A measure of the parent–child system. In C. P. Zalaquett & R. J. Wood (Eds.), Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 277–291). Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

11.

Wyatt Kaminski, J., Valle, A. L., Filene, J. H., et al. (2008). A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 567–589.CrossRef

12.

Alberta Centre for Child Family & Community Research. (2007). Common outcomes initiative: Roundtable final report. Edmonton, AB: Author.

13.

Allison, K. R., & Yoshida, K. K. (1989). Increasing response rates in community health surveys administered by telephone. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 80, 67–70.PubMed

14.

Howard, G. S., Ralph, K. M., Gulanick, N. A., et al. (1979). Internal validity in pretest–posttest, self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(1), 1–23.CrossRef

15.

Conger, R. D., Patterson, G. R., & Ge, X. (1995). It takes two to replicate: A mediational model for the impact of parents’ stress on adolescent adjustment. Child Development, 66(1), 80–97.PubMedCrossRef

16.

3 Cheers for the Early Years. (June 12, 2009). Parenting Needs Assessment: Final Report. Calgary, AB: Author.

17.

Griner Hill, L., & Betz, D. (2005). Revisiting the retrospective pretest. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(4), 501–517.CrossRef

18.

Skinner, H. A., Steinhauer, P., & Santa-Barbara, J. (1995). FAM-III manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-health Systems.

19.

Trute, B., & Hiebert-Murphy, D. (2005). Predicting family adjustment and parenting stress in childhood: Disability services using brief assessment tools. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 30(4), 217–225.CrossRef

20.

Dunst, C. J., Jenkins, V., & Trivette, C. M. (1984). The family support scale: Reliability and validity. Journal of Individual, Family and Community Wellness, 1, 45–52.

21.

Hanley, B., Tasse, M., Aman, M. G., et al. (1998). Psychometric properties of the Family Support Scale with Head Start families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 7(1), 69–77.CrossRef

22.

Ware, J., & Sherbourne, C. (1992). The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473–483.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E., et al. (2001). SF-8 Health survey manual—how to score and interpret single-item health measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated.

24.

Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

25.

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

26.

Lamb, T. (2005). The retrospective pretest: An imperfect but useful tool. The Evaluation Exchange, 11(2), 18–19.

Title: UpStart Parent Survey: A New Psychometrically Valid Tool for the Evaluation of Prevention-focused Parenting Programs
Authors: Karen Benzies
Dawn Clarke
Leslie Barker
Richelle Mychasiuk
Publication date: 01-10-2013
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 8/2013
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1152-2

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

UpStart Parent Survey: A New Psychometrically Valid Tool for the Evaluation of Prevention-focused Parenting Programs

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2013

Measuring Dosage: A Key Factor When Assessing the Relationship Between Prenatal Case Management and Birth Outcomes

A Comparison Between Late Preterm and Term Infants on Breastfeeding and Maternal Mental Health

Returning to Work One Year After Childbirth: Data from the Mother–Child Cohort EDEN

Women’s Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration During Pregnancy and Postpartum

A Qualitative Study of Gestational Weight Gain Counseling and Tracking

Underinsurance in Children with Special Health Care Needs: The Impact of Definition on Findings