Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2013

01-08-2013

Health Care Utilization in the First Year of Life among Small- and Large- for-Gestational Age Term Infants

Authors: Patricia M. Dietz, Joanne H. Rizzo, Lucinda J. England, William M. Callaghan, Kimberly K. Vesco, F. Carol Bruce, Joanna E. Bulkley, Andrea J. Sharma, Mark C. Hornbrook

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess if small- and large-for gestational age term infants have greater health care utilization during the first year of life. The sample included 28,215 singleton term infants (37–42 weeks) without major birth defects delivered from 1998 through 2007 and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Northwest for 12 months after delivery. Birth weight for gestational age was categorized into 3 levels: <10th percentile (SGA), 10–90th percentile (AGA), >90th percentile (LGA). Length of delivery hospitalization, re-hospitalizations and sick/emergency room visits were obtained from electronic records. Logistic regression models estimated associations between birth weight category and re-hospitalization. Generalized linear models estimated adjusted mean number of sick/emergency visits. Among term infants, 6.2 % were SGA and 13.9 % were LGA. Of infants born by cesarean section, SGA infants had 2.7 higher odds [95 % 1.9, 3.8] than AGA infants of staying ≥5 nights during the delivery hospitalization; of those born vaginally, SGA infants had 1.5 higher adjusted odds [95 % 1.1, 2.1] of staying ≥4 nights. LGA compared to AGA infants had higher odds of re-hospitalization within 2 weeks of delivery [OR 1.25, 95 % CI 0.99, 1.58] and of a length of stay ≥4 days during that hospitalization [OR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.3, 5.0]. The adjusted mean number of sick/emergency room visits was slightly higher in SGA (7.8) than AGA (7.5) infants (P < .05). Term infants born SGA or LGA had greater health care utilization than their counterparts, although the increase in utilization beyond the initial delivery hospitalization was small.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Minior, V. K., & Divon, M. Y. (1998). Fetal growth restriction at term: Myth or reality? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92(1), 57–60.PubMedCrossRef Minior, V. K., & Divon, M. Y. (1998). Fetal growth restriction at term: Myth or reality? Obstetrics and Gynecology, 92(1), 57–60.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zhang, X., Decker, A., Platt, R. W., & Kramer, M. S. (2008). How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(5), 517.e1–517.e6.CrossRef Zhang, X., Decker, A., Platt, R. W., & Kramer, M. S. (2008). How big is too big? The perinatal consequences of fetal macrosomia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 198(5), 517.e1–517.e6.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stotland, N. E., Caughey, A. B., Breed, E. M., & Escobar, G. J. (2004). Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macromia. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 87(3), 220–226.PubMedCrossRef Stotland, N. E., Caughey, A. B., Breed, E. M., & Escobar, G. J. (2004). Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macromia. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 87(3), 220–226.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999). Birthweight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(16), 1234–1238.PubMedCrossRef McIntire, D. D., Bloom, S. L., Casey, B. M., & Leveno, K. J. (1999). Birthweight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(16), 1234–1238.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Seeds, J. W., & Peng, J. (1998). Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: Is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 178, 658–669.PubMedCrossRef Seeds, J. W., & Peng, J. (1998). Impaired growth and risk of fetal death: Is the tenth percentile the appropriate standard? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 178, 658–669.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hornbrook, M. C., Whitlock, E. P., Berg, C. J., et al. (2006). Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes in an integrated health care delivery system. Health Services Research, 42, 908–927.CrossRef Hornbrook, M. C., Whitlock, E. P., Berg, C. J., et al. (2006). Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes in an integrated health care delivery system. Health Services Research, 42, 908–927.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Callaghan, W. M., & Dietz, P. M. (2010). Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171(7), 826–836.PubMedCrossRef Callaghan, W. M., & Dietz, P. M. (2010). Differences in birth weight for gestational age distributions according to the measures used to assign gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171(7), 826–836.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maisels, M. S., & Kring, E. A. (1998). Length of stay, jaundice, and hospital readmission. Pediatrics, 101, 995–998.PubMedCrossRef Maisels, M. S., & Kring, E. A. (1998). Length of stay, jaundice, and hospital readmission. Pediatrics, 101, 995–998.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Qiu, X., Lodha, A., Shah, P. S., Sankaran, K., Seshia, M. M., Yee, W., et al. (2012). Canadian Neonatal Network. Neonatal outcomes for small for gestational age preterm infants in Canada. American Journal of Perinatology, 29(2), 87–94.PubMedCrossRef Qiu, X., Lodha, A., Shah, P. S., Sankaran, K., Seshia, M. M., Yee, W., et al. (2012). Canadian Neonatal Network. Neonatal outcomes for small for gestational age preterm infants in Canada. American Journal of Perinatology, 29(2), 87–94.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Luu, T. M., Lefebvre, F., Riley, P., & Infante-Rivard, C. (2010). Continuing utilisation of specialised health services in extremely preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 95(5), F320–F325.PubMedCrossRef Luu, T. M., Lefebvre, F., Riley, P., & Infante-Rivard, C. (2010). Continuing utilisation of specialised health services in extremely preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 95(5), F320–F325.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bird, T. M., Bronstein, J. M., Hall, R. W., Lowery, C. L., Nugent, R., & Mays, G. P. (2010). Late preterm infants: birth outcomes and health care utilization in the first year. Pediatrics, 126(2), e311–e319.PubMedCrossRef Bird, T. M., Bronstein, J. M., Hall, R. W., Lowery, C. L., Nugent, R., & Mays, G. P. (2010). Late preterm infants: birth outcomes and health care utilization in the first year. Pediatrics, 126(2), e311–e319.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Health Care Utilization in the First Year of Life among Small- and Large- for-Gestational Age Term Infants
Authors
Patricia M. Dietz
Joanne H. Rizzo
Lucinda J. England
William M. Callaghan
Kimberly K. Vesco
F. Carol Bruce
Joanna E. Bulkley
Andrea J. Sharma
Mark C. Hornbrook
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1082-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Maternal and Child Health Journal 6/2013 Go to the issue