Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 2/2008

01-03-2008

Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Birthweight: A Propensity Score Matching Approach

Authors: Paula Veloso da Veiga, Ronald P. Wilder

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

There is accumulated evidence of the existence of a deleterious effect of smoking on birth outcomes. Understanding the effect of smoking on pregnancy is a critical issue because of the public policy implications for dissuading maternal smoking. We explore this issue by using the propensity score method and compare that with parametric estimators. First we estimate the treatment effect of smoking during pregnancy on different birth outcomes, by race. Then, we extend the method to the case of the multi-treatment “intensity of smoking.” The deleterious effect of smoking is found robust to the different estimation methods used.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kramer, M. (1987). Determinants of low birthweight, methodological assessment & meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Wealth Organization, 65(5), 663–733. Kramer, M. (1987). Determinants of low birthweight, methodological assessment & meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Wealth Organization, 65(5), 663–733.
2.
go back to reference Walsh, R. (1994). Effects of maternal smoking on the adverse pregnancy outcomes, examination of the criteria causation. Human Biology, 66(6), 1059–1092. Walsh, R. (1994). Effects of maternal smoking on the adverse pregnancy outcomes, examination of the criteria causation. Human Biology, 66(6), 1059–1092.
3.
go back to reference Heckman, J., & Robb, R. (1995). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. In: J. Heckman & B. Singer (Eds.), Longitudinal analysis of labor market data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–246. Heckman, J., & Robb, R. (1995). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. In: J. Heckman & B. Singer (Eds.), Longitudinal analysis of labor market data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 156–246.
4.
go back to reference Rosenzweig, M., & Schultz, T. (1983). Estimating a household production function, heterogeneity, the demand for health inputs & their effects on birth weight. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 723–746.CrossRef Rosenzweig, M., & Schultz, T. (1983). Estimating a household production function, heterogeneity, the demand for health inputs & their effects on birth weight. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 723–746.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Permutt, T., & Hebel, J. (1989). Simultaneous equation estimation in a clinical trial of the effect of smoking on birthweight. Biometrics, 45(2), 619–622.PubMedCrossRef Permutt, T., & Hebel, J. (1989). Simultaneous equation estimation in a clinical trial of the effect of smoking on birthweight. Biometrics, 45(2), 619–622.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Evans, W., & Ringel, J. (1999). Can higher cigarette taxes improve birth outcomes? Journal of Public Economics, 72(1), 135–154.CrossRef Evans, W., & Ringel, J. (1999). Can higher cigarette taxes improve birth outcomes? Journal of Public Economics, 72(1), 135–154.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hamilton, B. (2001). Estimating treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with non-compliance: The impact of maternal smoking on birthweight. Health Economics, 10(5), 399–410.PubMedCrossRef Hamilton, B. (2001). Estimating treatment effects in randomized clinical trials with non-compliance: The impact of maternal smoking on birthweight. Health Economics, 10(5), 399–410.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yerushalmy, J. (1971). The relationship of parents’ cigarette smoking to outcome of pregnancy. Implication as to the problem of inferring causation from observed associations. Journal of Epidemiology, 93(6), 443–446. Yerushalmy, J. (1971). The relationship of parents’ cigarette smoking to outcome of pregnancy. Implication as to the problem of inferring causation from observed associations. Journal of Epidemiology, 93(6), 443–446.
9.
go back to reference Butler, N., Goldstein, H., & Ross, M. (1972). Cigarette smoking in pregnancy: Its influence on birthweight and perinatal mortality. British Medical Journal, 2(806), 127–130.PubMed Butler, N., Goldstein, H., & Ross, M. (1972). Cigarette smoking in pregnancy: Its influence on birthweight and perinatal mortality. British Medical Journal, 2(806), 127–130.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Silverman, D. (1977). Maternal smoking and birthweight. Journal of Epidemiology, 105(6), 513–521. Silverman, D. (1977). Maternal smoking and birthweight. Journal of Epidemiology, 105(6), 513–521.
11.
go back to reference Hickey, R., Clelland, R., & Bowers, E. (1978). Maternal smoking, birthweight, infant death, & the self-selection problem. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131, 805–811. Hickey, R., Clelland, R., & Bowers, E. (1978). Maternal smoking, birthweight, infant death, & the self-selection problem. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131, 805–811.
12.
go back to reference Angrist, J., & Krueger, B. (1999). Empirical strategies in labor economics. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, Vol. III A., Chapter 23, pp. 1277–1366. Angrist, J., & Krueger, B. (1999). Empirical strategies in labor economics. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, Vol. III A., Chapter 23, pp. 1277–1366.
13.
go back to reference Heckman, J., Lalonde, R., & Smith, J. (1999). The Economics & econometrics of active labour market programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, Vol. III A., Chapter 31, pp. 1865–2097. Available at http, //lily.src.uchicago.edu/papers/papers.html. Heckman, J., Lalonde, R., & Smith, J. (1999). The Economics & econometrics of active labour market programs. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics, Vol. III A., Chapter 31, pp. 1865–2097. Available at http, //lily.src.uchicago.edu/papers/papers.html.
14.
go back to reference Rubin, D. (1977). Assignment to a treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26.CrossRef Rubin, D. (1977). Assignment to a treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRef Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 265–294.CrossRef Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 265–294.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Imbens, G. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose response functions. Biometrika, 87(3), 706–710.CrossRef Imbens, G. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose response functions. Biometrika, 87(3), 706–710.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lechner, M. (1999). Identification & Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments Under the Conditional Independence Assumption, Discussion Paper 9908, University of St. Gallen. Unpublished manuscript. Lechner, M. (1999). Identification & Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments Under the Conditional Independence Assumption, Discussion Paper 9908, University of St. Gallen. Unpublished manuscript.
19.
go back to reference Sianesi, B. (2001). Implementing Propensity Score Matching Estimators With STATA, Prepared for UK Stata Users Group, VII Meeting. London, May. Sianesi, B. (2001). Implementing Propensity Score Matching Estimators With STATA, Prepared for UK Stata Users Group, VII Meeting. London, May.
20.
go back to reference Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in non-experimental studies: re-evaluation the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1053–1062.CrossRef Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in non-experimental studies: re-evaluation the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1053–1062.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dehejia, R., & Wabha, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics & Statistics, 48(1), 151–161.CrossRef Dehejia, R., & Wabha, S. (2002). Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. The Review of Economics & Statistics, 48(1), 151–161.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Heckman, J. (1998). Instrumental variables: Study of Implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 441–462.CrossRef Heckman, J. (1998). Instrumental variables: Study of Implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 441–462.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Angrist, J., & Hahn, J. (1999). When to Control for Covariate Panel—Asymptotic Results for Estimates of Treatment Effects, Technical Working Paper, 241, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Angrist, J., & Hahn, J. (1999). When to Control for Covariate Panel—Asymptotic Results for Estimates of Treatment Effects, Technical Working Paper, 241, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
24.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (1985). Committee to study the prevention of low birthweight. Preventing Low Birthweight, Washington D.C, National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine (1985). Committee to study the prevention of low birthweight. Preventing Low Birthweight, Washington D.C, National Academy Press.
25.
go back to reference Corman, H., Joyce, T., & Grossman, M. (1987). Birth outcome production function in the United States. The Journal of Human Resources, 22, 322–360.CrossRef Corman, H., Joyce, T., & Grossman, M. (1987). Birth outcome production function in the United States. The Journal of Human Resources, 22, 322–360.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liu, G. (1998). Birth outcomes and effectiveness of prenatal care. Health Services Research, 32(6), 805–823.PubMed Liu, G. (1998). Birth outcomes and effectiveness of prenatal care. Health Services Research, 32(6), 805–823.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Frank, R., Jackson, C., Salkever, D., & Strobino, D. (1992). Update estimates of the impact of prenatal care on birth weight outcomes by race. Journal of Human Resources, 27(4), 629–642.CrossRef Frank, R., Jackson, C., Salkever, D., & Strobino, D. (1992). Update estimates of the impact of prenatal care on birth weight outcomes by race. Journal of Human Resources, 27(4), 629–642.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Frisbie, W. (1994) Birthweight and infant mortality in the mexican origin and anglo populations. Social Science Quarterly, 75(4), 881–895. Frisbie, W. (1994) Birthweight and infant mortality in the mexican origin and anglo populations. Social Science Quarterly, 75(4), 881–895.
29.
go back to reference Kotelchuck, M. (1994). The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index, its us distribution & association with low birthweight. Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1489–1468.CrossRef Kotelchuck, M. (1994). The adequacy of prenatal care utilization index, its us distribution & association with low birthweight. Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1489–1468.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lightwood, J., Phibbs, C., & Glantz, S. (1994). Short-term health and economics benefits of smoking cessation: Low birth weight. Pediatrics, 104(6), 1312–1320.CrossRef Lightwood, J., Phibbs, C., & Glantz, S. (1994). Short-term health and economics benefits of smoking cessation: Low birth weight. Pediatrics, 104(6), 1312–1320.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Birthweight: A Propensity Score Matching Approach
Authors
Paula Veloso da Veiga
Ronald P. Wilder
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0238-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Maternal and Child Health Journal 2/2008 Go to the issue