Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Religion and Health 1/2016

01-02-2016 | Original Paper

Religious Perspectives on Human Suffering: Implications for Medicine and Bioethics

Authors: Scott J. Fitzpatrick, Ian H. Kerridge, Christopher F. C. Jordens, Laurie Zoloth, Christopher Tollefsen, Karma Lekshe Tsomo, Michael P. Jensen, Abdulaziz Sachedina, Deepak Sarma

Published in: Journal of Religion and Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

The prevention and relief of suffering has long been a core medical concern. But while this is a laudable goal, some question whether medicine can, or should, aim for a world without pain, sadness, anxiety, despair or uncertainty. To explore these issues, we invited experts from six of the world’s major faith traditions to address the following question. Is there value in suffering? And is something lost in the prevention and/or relief of suffering? While each of the perspectives provided maintains that suffering should be alleviated and that medicine’s proper role is to prevent and relieve suffering by ethical means, it is also apparent that questions regarding the meaning and value of suffering are beyond the realm of medicine. These perspectives suggest that medicine and bioethics have much to gain from respectful consideration of religious discourse surrounding suffering.
Footnotes
1
“Him” meaning the actual men that the rabbis were nearly always thinking about.
 
Literature
go back to reference Boston, P., Bruce, A., & Schreiber, R. (2011). Existential suffering in the palliative care setting: An integrated literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(3), 604–618.PubMedCrossRef Boston, P., Bruce, A., & Schreiber, R. (2011). Existential suffering in the palliative care setting: An integrated literature review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 41(3), 604–618.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Breggin, P. R. (2003). Psychopharmacology and human values. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(2), 34–49.CrossRef Breggin, P. R. (2003). Psychopharmacology and human values. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(2), 34–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Buber, M. (1952). Images of good and evil. London: Routledge & Kegan. Buber, M. (1952). Images of good and evil. London: Routledge & Kegan.
go back to reference Edwards, S. (2003). Three concepts of suffering. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 6(1), 59–66.CrossRef Edwards, S. (2003). Three concepts of suffering. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 6(1), 59–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Egnew, T. R. (2009). Suffering, meaning, and healing: Challenges of contemporary medicine. The Annals of Family Medicine, 7(2), 170–175.PubMedCrossRef Egnew, T. R. (2009). Suffering, meaning, and healing: Challenges of contemporary medicine. The Annals of Family Medicine, 7(2), 170–175.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Elliott, C. (1998). The tyranny of happiness: Ethics and cosmetic psychopharmacology. In E. Parens (Ed.), Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications (pp. 177–188). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Elliott, C. (1998). The tyranny of happiness: Ethics and cosmetic psychopharmacology. In E. Parens (Ed.), Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications (pp. 177–188). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
go back to reference Hauerwas, S. (1991). Naming the silences: God, medicine, and the problem of suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William Eerdmans. Hauerwas, S. (1991). Naming the silences: God, medicine, and the problem of suffering. Grand Rapids, MI: William Eerdmans.
go back to reference Lewis, C. S. (1996). The problem of pain. New York: Harper Collins. Lewis, C. S. (1996). The problem of pain. New York: Harper Collins.
go back to reference Maimonides, M. (1986). A guide for the perplexed. Los Angeles: University of Judaism. Maimonides, M. (1986). A guide for the perplexed. Los Angeles: University of Judaism.
go back to reference Norris, R. S. (2009). The paradox of healing pain. Religion, 39(1), 22–33.CrossRef Norris, R. S. (2009). The paradox of healing pain. Religion, 39(1), 22–33.CrossRef
go back to reference Ormsby, E. L. (1984). Theodicy in Islamic thought: The dispute over Al-Ghazali’s “Best of All Possible Worlds”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Ormsby, E. L. (1984). Theodicy in Islamic thought: The dispute over Al-Ghazali’s “Best of All Possible Worlds”. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Peperzak, A. T. (1993). To the other: An introduction to the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press. Peperzak, A. T. (1993). To the other: An introduction to the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
go back to reference Qummi, A. (2002). Mafatih al-jinan. Tehran: KitabfurushiIslami (Originally published 1381). Qummi, A. (2002). Mafatih al-jinan. Tehran: KitabfurushiIslami (Originally published 1381).
go back to reference Stark, R. (1996). The rise of Christianity: A sociologist reconsiders history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Stark, R. (1996). The rise of Christianity: A sociologist reconsiders history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Wensinck, A. J. (1965). The Muslim creed: Its genesis and historical development. London: Frank Cass & Co. Wensinck, A. J. (1965). The Muslim creed: Its genesis and historical development. London: Frank Cass & Co.
Metadata
Title
Religious Perspectives on Human Suffering: Implications for Medicine and Bioethics
Authors
Scott J. Fitzpatrick
Ian H. Kerridge
Christopher F. C. Jordens
Laurie Zoloth
Christopher Tollefsen
Karma Lekshe Tsomo
Michael P. Jensen
Abdulaziz Sachedina
Deepak Sarma
Publication date
01-02-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0014-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Journal of Religion and Health 1/2016 Go to the issue