Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2012

01-06-2012

Supporting Return-to-Work in the Face of Legislation: Stakeholders’ Experiences with Return-to-Work After Breast Cancer in Belgium

Authors: Corine Tiedtke, Peter Donceel, Lieve Knops, Huget Désiron, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, Angelique de Rijk

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background The diagnosis of breast cancer increasingly implies a return-to-work (RTW) challenge as survival rates increase. RTW is regarded as a multidisciplinary process and a country’s legislation affects the degree of involvement of the different stakeholders. We elucidated on bottlenecks and contributing factors and the relationship between policy and practice regarding RTW of employees with breast cancer as perceived by Belgian (Flemish) stakeholders. Methods Three multidisciplinary groups (n = 7, n = 9, n = 10) were interviewed during a breast cancer conference. Treating physicians (n = 4), employers (n = 6), social security physicians (n = 3), occupational physicians (n = 4), survivors (n = 5) and representatives of patient associations (n = 4) were included. The major theme was the legal and practical role in the RTW process as experienced by the participants. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed to analyse stakeholders’ experiences of women’s RTW after breast cancer. Results The stakeholders reported different perspectives. Employees focus on treatment and feel ill-informed about the RTW options. Treating physicians do not feel competent about advising on work-related questions. Employers have to balance the interests of both the business and the employee. Social security physicians assess ability to work and facilitate RTW options. Occupational physicians see opportunities but the legislation does not support their involvement. Stakeholders expressed the need for coordination and reported finding ways to accommodate the employee’s needs by being flexible with the legislation to support the RTW process. Conclusions Two factors might hamper RTW for breast cancer patients: the varying stakeholder perspectives and Belgian legislation which emphasizes the patient or disability role, but not the employee role. When stakeholders are motivated they find ways to support RTW, but improved legislation could support the necessary coordination of RTW for these patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vingård E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A. Consequences of being at sick leave. Scand J Public Health. 2004;563:207–15.CrossRef Vingård E, Alexanderson K, Norlund A. Consequences of being at sick leave. Scand J Public Health. 2004;563:207–15.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, De Vet HC, Franche RL, Schonstein E, Loisel P, et al. Workplace interventions of preventing work disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;15:2. CD006955. Van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, De Vet HC, Franche RL, Schonstein E, Loisel P, et al. Workplace interventions of preventing work disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;15:2. CD006955.
3.
go back to reference Tiedtke C, De Rijk A, de Casterlé BD, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Experiences and concerns about returning to work for women breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19:677–83.PubMedCrossRef Tiedtke C, De Rijk A, de Casterlé BD, Christiaens MR, Donceel P. Experiences and concerns about returning to work for women breast cancer survivors: a literature review. Psycho-Oncology. 2010;19:677–83.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:525–42.PubMedCrossRef Franche RL, Baril R, Shaw W, Nicholas M, Loisel P. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: optimizing role of stakeholders in implementation and research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15:525–42.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, Anema JR, Van Poppel MN. Return to work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4). doi:10.1007/s10926-005-8033-0. Young AE, Wasiak R, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, Anema JR, Van Poppel MN. Return to work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4). doi:10.​1007/​s10926-005-8033-0.
7.
go back to reference Mortelmans AK, Donceel P, Lahaye D. Disability management through positive intervention in stakeholders’ information asymmetry. A pilot study. Occup Med. 2006;56:129–36. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqj014.CrossRef Mortelmans AK, Donceel P, Lahaye D. Disability management through positive intervention in stakeholders’ information asymmetry. A pilot study. Occup Med. 2006;56:129–36. doi:10.​1093/​occmed/​kqj014.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gobelet C, Luthi F, Al-khodairy AT, Chamberlain MA. Vocational rehabilitation: a multidisciplinary intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1405–10.PubMedCrossRef Gobelet C, Luthi F, Al-khodairy AT, Chamberlain MA. Vocational rehabilitation: a multidisciplinary intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1405–10.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shaw W, Hong Q, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:2–15. doi:10.1007/s10926-007-9115-y.PubMedCrossRef Shaw W, Hong Q, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18:2–15. doi:10.​1007/​s10926-007-9115-y.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Maiwald K, De Rijk A, Guzman J, Schonstein E, Yassi, A. Evaluation of a workplace disability prevention intervention in Canada: examining differing perceptions of stakeholders. J Occup Rehabil. 2010. doi:10.1007/s10926-010-9267-z. Maiwald K, De Rijk A, Guzman J, Schonstein E, Yassi, A. Evaluation of a workplace disability prevention intervention in Canada: examining differing perceptions of stakeholders. J Occup Rehabil. 2010. doi:10.​1007/​s10926-010-9267-z.
11.
go back to reference Van Raak A, De Rijk A, Morsa J. Applying new institutional theory: the case of collaboration to promote work resumption after sickness absence. Work Employ Soc. 2005;19:141.CrossRef Van Raak A, De Rijk A, Morsa J. Applying new institutional theory: the case of collaboration to promote work resumption after sickness absence. Work Employ Soc. 2005;19:141.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference De Rijk A, Van Raak A, Van der Made J. A new theoretical model for cooperation in public health settings: the RDIC model. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1103.PubMedCrossRef De Rijk A, Van Raak A, Van der Made J. A new theoretical model for cooperation in public health settings: the RDIC model. Qual Health Res. 2007;17:1103.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers, a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD report. France; 2010. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers, a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. OECD report. France; 2010.
14.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Brunarski D, Shaw L, Doupe L. Moving toward virtual interdisciplinary teams and a multi-stakeholder approach in community-based return to work care. Work. 2008;30:329–36.PubMed Brunarski D, Shaw L, Doupe L. Moving toward virtual interdisciplinary teams and a multi-stakeholder approach in community-based return to work care. Work. 2008;30:329–36.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers’ perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:169–81.PubMedCrossRef Larsson A, Gard G. How can the rehabilitation planning process at the workplace be improved? A qualitative study from employers’ perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:169–81.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. The workplace based return to work literature review group. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:257–69.PubMedCrossRef MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. The workplace based return to work literature review group. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:257–69.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2007;5:75–96. MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2007;5:75–96.
19.
go back to reference Williams R, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19:87–93.PubMed Williams R, Westmorland M. Perspectives on workplace disability management: a review of the literature. Work. 2002;19:87–93.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Rosenthal D, Hursh N, Lui J, Isom R, Sasson J. A survey of current disability management practice: emerging trends and implications for certification. RCB. 2007;50:76–86. Rosenthal D, Hursh N, Lui J, Isom R, Sasson J. A survey of current disability management practice: emerging trends and implications for certification. RCB. 2007;50:76–86.
21.
go back to reference Pransky GS, Shaw WS, Franche RL, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers—current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:625–34.PubMedCrossRef Pransky GS, Shaw WS, Franche RL, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers—current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:625–34.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, van Rhenen W, Groothof JW, van der Klink JJ, Bültmann U. Trends in return to work of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128:237–42.PubMedCrossRef Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, van Rhenen W, Groothof JW, van der Klink JJ, Bültmann U. Trends in return to work of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128:237–42.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tjulin A, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:311–21.PubMedCrossRef Tjulin A, MacEachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:311–21.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Høgelund J. Reintegration: public or private responsibility? Consequences of Dutch and Danish policies toward work-disabled persons. Int J Health Serv. 2002;32:467–87.PubMedCrossRef Høgelund J. Reintegration: public or private responsibility? Consequences of Dutch and Danish policies toward work-disabled persons. Int J Health Serv. 2002;32:467–87.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419–26.PubMedCrossRef Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:419–26.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Supporting Return-to-Work in the Face of Legislation: Stakeholders’ Experiences with Return-to-Work After Breast Cancer in Belgium
Authors
Corine Tiedtke
Peter Donceel
Lieve Knops
Huget Désiron
Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé
Angelique de Rijk
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9342-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2012 Go to the issue