Top

Published in:

01-06-2011

Vocational Rehabilitation From the Client’s Perspective Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Reference

Authors: Andrea Glässel, Monika E. Finger, Alarcos Cieza, Christine Treitler, Michaela Coenen, Reuben Escorpizo

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2011

Abstract

Introduction A mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative), multicenter study was conducted using a focus group design to explore the lived experiences of persons in vocational rehabilitation (VR) with regard to functioning and contextual factors using six open-ended questions related to the ICF components. The results were classified by using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a frame of reference. Methods The meaningful concepts within the transcribed data were identified and linked to ICF categories according to established linking rules. Results The seven focus groups with 26 participants yielded a total of 4,813 relevant concepts which were linked to a total of 160 different second-level ICF categories. From the client perspective, the ICF components (a) body functions, (b) activities and participation and (c) environmental factors were equally represented, while (d) body structures appeared less frequently. Out of the total number of concepts, 864 concepts (18%) were assigned to the ICF component personal factors which is not yet classified but could indicate important aspects of resource management and strategy development of patients in VR. Conclusion Therefore, VR of patients must not be limited to anatomical and pathophysiologic changes, but should also consider a more comprehensive view which includes client’s demands, strategies and resources in daily life and the context around the individual and social circumstances of their work situation.

Escorpizo R, Ekholm J, Gmünder HP, Cieza A, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Developing a core set to describe functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2010.

Selander J, Marnetoft S, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(14):704–12.PubMedCrossRef

Young AE. Return to work following disabling occupational injury—facilitators of employment continuation. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010.

Young AE. Employment maintenance and the factors that impact it after vocational rehabilitation and return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(20):1621–32.PubMedCrossRef

Slebus FG, Sluiter JK, Kuijer PP, Willems JH, Frings-Dresen MH. Work-ability evaluation: a piece of cake or a hard nut to crack? Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(16):1295–300.PubMedCrossRef

World Health Organization. WHO Rehabilitation after cardiovascular diseases, with special emphasis on developing countries. Report of WHO expert committee. Geneva: WHO; 1993.

O’Donovan MA, Doyle A, Gallagher P. Barriers, activities and participation: incorporating ICF into service planning datasets. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(25):2073–80.PubMedCrossRef

Sandberg MA, Bush SS, Martin T. Beyond diagnosis: understanding the healthcare challenges of injured veterans through the application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(8):1416–32.PubMedCrossRef

Homa DB. Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in job placement. Work. 2007;29(4):277–86.PubMed

10.

Fantoni SQ, Peugniez C, Duhamel A, Skrzypczak J, Frimat P, Leroyer A. Factors related to return to work by women with breast cancer in northern France. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):49–58.PubMedCrossRef

11.

World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.

12.

Keus F, de Vries J, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ. Assessing factors influencing return back to work after cholecystectomy: a qualitative research. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:12.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Tjulin A, Edvardsson Stiwne E, Ekberg K. Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):409–18.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care: assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320:50–2.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ. 2000;320(7227):114–6.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Giacomini M, Cook D. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care, A. Are the results of the study valid. JAMA. 2000;284:357–62.PubMedCrossRef

17.

MacEachen E, Kosny A, Ferrier S. Unexpected barriers in return to work: lessons learned from injured worker peer support groups. Work. 2007;29(2):155–64.PubMed

18.

Cohen D, Marfell N, Webb K, Robling M, Aylward M. Managing long-term worklessness in primary care: a focus group study. Occup Med. 2010;60(2):121–6.CrossRef

19.

Pincus T, Woodcock A, Vogel S. Returning back pain patients to work: how private musculoskeletal practitioners outside the National Health Service perceive their role (an interview study). J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):322–30.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Dunn EC, Wewiorski NJ, Rogers ES. A qualitative investigation of individual and contextual factors associated with vocational recovery among people with serious mental illness. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010;80(2):185–94.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: survivors’ experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1858–69.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Coutu MF, Baril R, Durand MJ, Cote D, Rouleau A, Cadieux G. Transforming the meaning of pain: an important step for the return to work. Work. 2010;35(2):209–19.PubMed

23.

Johnsson A, Fornander T, Rutqvist LE, Olsson M. Factors influencing return to work: a narrative study of women treated for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Care. 2010;19(3):317–23.CrossRef

24.

Buijs PC, Lambeek LC, Koppenrade V, Hooftman WE, Anema JR. Can workers with chronic back pain shift from pain elimination to function restore at work? Qualitative evaluation of an innovative work related multidisciplinary programme. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2009;22(2):65–73.PubMed

25.

Stergiou-Kita M, Yantzi A, Wan J. The personal and workplace factors relevant to work readiness evaluation following acquired brain injury: occupational therapists’ perceptions. Brain Inj. 2010;24(7–8):948–58.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Cowls J, Galloway E. Understanding how traumatic re-enactment impacts the workplace: assisting clients’ successful return to work. Work. 2009;33(4):401–11.PubMed

27.

Gardner BT, Pransky G, Shaw WS, Nha Hong Q, Loisel P. Researcher perspectives on competencies of return-to-work coordinators. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(1):72–8.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Ammendolia C, Cassidy D, Steensta I, Soklaridis S, Boyle E, Eng S, et al. Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: an intervention mapping approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:65.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Pransky G, Shaw WS, Loisel P, Hong QN, Desorcy B. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):41–8.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Kvale S. Interviews- an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. California: Sage; 1996.

31.

Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1990.

32.

Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. A qualitative study of perpetuating factors for long term sick leave and promoting factors for return to work: chronic work disabled patients in their own words. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(6):544–52.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Cabral LH, Sampaio RF, Figueiredo IM, Mancini MC. Factors associated with return to work following a hand injury: a qualitative/quantitative approach. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010;14(2):149–57.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Joyce KE, Smith KE, Henderson G, Greig G, Bambra C. Patient perspectives of condition management programmes as a route to better health, well-being and employability. Fam Pract. 2010;27(1):101–9.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Chan SK, Man DW. Barriers to returning to work for people with spinal cord injuries: a focus group study. Work. 2005;25(4):325–32.PubMed

36.

Coenen M, Cieza A, Stamm TA, Amann E, Kollerits B, Stucki G. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core Set for rheumatoid arthritis from the patient perspective using focus groups. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(4):R84.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Kirchberger I, Sinnott A, Charlifue S, Kovindha A, Luthi H, Campbell R, et al. Functioning and disability in spinal cord injury from the consumer perspective: an international qualitative study using focus groups and the ICF. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(8):603–13.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Kirchberger I, Coenen M, Hierl FX, Dieterle C, Seissler J, Stucki G, et al. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for diabetes mellitus from the patient perspective using focus groups. Diabet Med. 2009;26(7):700–7.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Hieblinger R, Coenen M, Stucki G, Winkelmann A, Cieza A. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health core set for chronic widespread pain from the perspective of fibromyalgia patients. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(3):R67.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Glaser BG, Strauss A. Discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley: Sociology Press; 1967.

41.

Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory. Procedures and technique. 2nd ed. NewburyPark: Sage; 1998.

42.

Gradinger F, Köhler B, Khatami R, Mathis J, Cieza A, Bassetti C. Problems in functioning from the patient perspective using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. J Sleep Res. 2010.

43.

Tschiesner U, Linseisen E, Coenen M, Rogers S, Harreus U, Berghaus A, et al. Evaluating sequelae after head and neck cancer from the patient perspective with the help of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(3):425–36.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2000.

45.

Depoy E, Gitlin LN. Introduction to research. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998.

46.

Karlsson G. Psychological qualitative research from a phenomenological perspective. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International; 1993.

47.

Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, et al. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(5):205–10.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212–8.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measur. 1960;20:37–46.CrossRef

50.

Vierkant R. A SAS macro for calculating bootstrapped confidence intervals about a kappa coefficient. Marshfield: Medical Research Foundation. Available from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi22/STATS/PAPER295.PDF. 2010.

51.

United Nations Convention of the rights of Persons with Disabilities. In: U.NATIONS (Ed, New York, 2006).

52.

Young AE. Return-to-work experiences: prior to receiving vocational services. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(24):2013–22.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Brouwers EP, Terluin B, Tiemens BG, Verhaak PF. Predicting return to work in employees sick-listed due to minor mental disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):323–32.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Lydell M, Grahn B, Mansson J, Baigi A, Marklund B. Predictive factors of sustained return to work for persons with musculoskeletal disorders who participated in rehabilitation. Work. 2009;33(3):317–28.PubMed

55.

Stice BD, Dik BJ. Depression among injured workers receiving vocational rehabilitation: contributions of work values, pain, and stress. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):354–63.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Tjulin A, Maceachen E, Ekberg K. Exploring workplace actors experiences of the social organization of return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):311–21.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Amir Z, Wynn P, Chan F, Strauser D, Whitaker S, Luker K. Return to work after cancer in the UK: attitudes and experiences of line managers. J Occup Rehabil. 2009.

58.

Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage; 1997.

59.

Curtis S, Gesler W, Smith G, Washburn S. Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1001–14.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Knodel J. The design and analysis of focus group studies. In: Morgan DL, editor. Successful focus groups. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 35–50.

61.

Krueger RA. The future of focus groups. Qual Health Res. 1995;5(4):524–30.CrossRef

62.

Carey A. The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. 1994; 225–41.

Title: Vocational Rehabilitation From the Client’s Perspective Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Reference
Authors: Andrea Glässel
Monika E. Finger
Alarcos Cieza
Christine Treitler
Michaela Coenen
Reuben Escorpizo
Publication date: 01-06-2011
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2011
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9277-x

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Vocational Rehabilitation From the Client’s Perspective Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Reference

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2011

Identification of Relevant ICF Categories in Vocational Rehabilitation: A Cross Sectional Study Evaluating the Clinical Perspective

A Systematic Review of Functioning in Vocational Rehabilitation Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health

Evaluation of a Workplace Disability Prevention Intervention in Canada: Examining Differing Perceptions of Stakeholders

Relation Between Perceived Health and Sick Leave in Employees With a Chronic Illness

On the Effects of a Workplace Fitness Program upon Pain Perception: a Case Study Encompassing Office Workers in a Portuguese Context

Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Athletic Trainer