Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2007

01-06-2007

Accuracy of a Disability Instrument to Identify Workers Likely to Develop Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders

Authors: Bert Stover, Barbara Silverstein, Thomas Wickizer, Diane P. Martin, Joel Kaufman

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 2/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Work related upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) result in substantial disability, and expense. Identifying workers or jobs with high risk can trigger intervention before workers are injured or the condition worsens.

Methods

We investigated a disability instrument, the QuickDASH, as a workplace screening tool to identify workers at high risk of developing upper extremity MSDs. Subjects included workers reporting recurring upper extremity MSD symptoms in the past 7 days (n = 559).

Results

The QuickDASH was reasonably accurate at baseline with sensitivity of 73% for MSD diagnosis, and 96% for symptom severity. Specificity was 56% for diagnosis, and 53% for symptom severity. At 1-year follow-up sensitivity and specificity for MSD diagnosis was 72% and 54%, respectively, as predicted by the baseline QuickDASH score. For symptom severity, sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 52%. An a priori target sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 50% was met by symptom severity, work pace and quality, and MSD diagnosis.

Conclusion

The QuickDASH may be useful for identifying jobs or workers with increased risk for upper extremity MSDs. It may provide an efficient health surveillance screening tool useful for targeting early workplace intervention for prevention of upper extremity MSD problems.
Literature
1.
Stock, S. R., Cole, D. C., Tugwell, P., & Streiner, D. (1996). Review of applicability of existing functional status measures to the study of workers with musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper limb. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(6), 679–688.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Salerno, D. F., Copley-Merriman, C., Taylor, T. N., Shinogle, J., & Schulz, R. M. (2002). A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(10), 664–670.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Cheadle, A., Franklin, G., Wolfhagen, C., Savarino, J., Liu, P. Y., Salley, C., et al. (1994). Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: A population-based study of Washington State workers’ compensation. American Journal of Public Health, 84(2), 190–196.PubMed
4.
Foley, M., Silverstein, B., & Polissar, N. (2007). The economic burden of carpal tunnel syndrome: Long-term earnings of CTS claimants in Washington state. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 50, 155–172.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Keogh, J. P., Nuwayhid, I., Gordon, J. L., & Gucer, P. W. (2000). The impact of occupational injury on injured worker and family: Outcomes of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in Maryland workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 38(5), 498–506.PubMedCrossRef
6.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine (2001). Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace: Low back and upper extremities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
L&I Washington State Department of Labor and Industries (2000). Concise explanatory statement WAC 296-62-051, Ergonomics. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Labor and Industries.
8.
Pransky, G., Snyder, T., Dembe, A., & Himmelstein, J. (1999). Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: A case study and review of the literature. Ergonomics, 42(1), 171–182.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Rosenman, K. D., Gardiner, J. C., Wang, J., Biddle, J., Hogan, A., Reilly, M. J., et al. (2000). Why most workers with occupational repetitive trauma do not file for workers’ compensation. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 42(1), 25–34.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (2001). National Occupational Research Agenda for musculoskeletal disorders: Research topics for the next decade a report by the NORA Musculoskeletal Disorders Team. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2001-117. www.cdc.gov/niosh/homepage.html.
11.
Aaras, A. (1994). The impact of ergonomic intervention on individual health and corporate prosperity in a telecommunications environment. Ergonomics, 37(10), 1679–1696.PubMed
12.
Silverstein, B. A., & Clark, R. (2004). Interventions to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 14, 135–152.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Melhorn, J. M., Wilkinson, L., & Riggs, J. D. (2001). Management of musculoskeletal pain in the workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 43(2), 83–93.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Buckle, P. W., & Devereux, J. J. (2002). The nature of work-related neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders. Applied Ergonomics, 33(3), 207–217.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Katz, J. N., Stock, S. R., Evanoff, B. A., Rempel, D., Moore, J. S., Franzblau, A., et al. (2000). Classification criteria and severity assessment in work-associated upper extremity disorders: Methods matter. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 38(4), 369–372.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Ohlsson, K., Attewell, R. G., Johnsson, B., Ahlm, A., & Skerfving, S. (1994). An assessment of neck and upper extremity disorders by questionnaire and clinical examination. Ergonomics, 37(5), 891–897.PubMed
17.
Center for Disease Control. (1988). Guidelines for evaluaing surveillance systems. Center for Disease Control;. Report No.: MMWR 37 (S-5), pp. 1–18.
18.
Hagberg, M., Silverstein, B., Wells, R., Smith, M. J., Hendrick, H. W., Carayon, P., et al (1995). Work related musculoskeletal disorders: A reference book for prevention. Bristol, PA, USA: Taylor & Francis.
19.
Beaton, D. E., Cole, D. C., Manno, M., Bombardier, C., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Shannon, H. S. (2000). Describing the burden of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders in newspaper workers: What difference do case definitions make? Journal Of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(1), 39–53.CrossRef
20.
Franzblau, A., Werner, R. A., Valle, J., & Johnston, E. (1993). Workplace surveillance for carpal tunnel syndrome: A comparison of methods. Journal Of Occupational Rehabilitation, 3(1), 1–14.CrossRef
21.
Corlett, E. N., Bishop, R. P. (1976). Technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics, 19(2), 175–182.PubMed
22.
Boussenna, M., Corlett, E. N., Pheasant, S. T. (1982). The relation between discomfort and postural loading at the joints. Ergonomics, 25(4), 315–322.PubMed
23.
Kilroy, N., Dockrell, S. (2000). Ergonomic intervention: Its effect on working posture and musculoskeletal symptoms in female biomedical scientists. British Journal of Biomedical Science, 57(3), 199–206.PubMed
24.
Wilson, I. B., Cleary, P. D. (1995). Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(1), 59–65.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Katz, J. N., Gelberman, R. H., Wright, E. A., Lew, R. A., & Liang, M. H. (1994). Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Medical Care, 32(11), 1127–1133.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Feinstein, A. R., Josephy, B. R., & Wells, C. K. (1986). Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Annals of Internal Medicine, 105(3), 413–420.PubMed
27.
Pincus, T., Callahan, L. F., Brooks, R. H., Fuchs, H. A., Olsen, N. J., & Kaye, J. J. (1989). Self-report questionnaire scores in rheumatoid arthritis compared with traditional physical, radiographic, and laboratory measures. Annals of Internal Medicine, 110(4), 259–266.PubMed
28.
Pransky, G., Feuerstein, M., Himmelstein, J., Katz, J. N., & Vickers-Lahti, M. (1997). Measuring functional outcomes in work-related upper extremity disorders development and validation of the upper extremity function scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 39(12), 1195–1202.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Friedman, P. J. (1997). Predictors of work disability in work-related upper-extremity disorders. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 39(4), 339–343.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Katz, J. N., Lew, R. A., Bessette, L., Punnett, L., Fossel, A. H., Mooney, N., et al. (1998). Prevalence and predictors of long-term work disability due to carpal tunnel syndrome. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 33(6), 543–550.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Solway, S., Beaton, D. E., McConnell, S., & Bombardier, C. (2002). The DASH outcome measure user’s manual (2nd ed.). Toronto: Institute for Work & Health.
32.
Beaton, D. E., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. H., Wright, J. G., Tarasuk, V., & Bombardier, C. (2001). Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14(2), 128–146.PubMed
33.
Beaton, D., Davis, A., Hudak, P., & McConnell, S. (2001). The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) outcome measure: What do we know about it now?. British Journal of Hand Therapy, 6(4), 109–118.
34.
Silverstein, B. A., Stetson, D. S., Keyserling, W. M., & Fine, L. J. (1997). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Comparison of data sources for surveillance. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 31(5), 600–608.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Sluiter, J. K., Rest, K. M., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2001). Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 27, 1–102.
36.
Murphy, J. M., Berwick, D. M., Weinstein, M. C., Borus, J. F., Budman, S. H., & Klerman, G. L. (1987). Performance of screening and diagnostic-tests—Application of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44(6), 550–555.PubMed
37.
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (3nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Beaton, D. E. (2000). Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine, 25(24), 3192–3199.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Katz, J. N., Wright, J. G., Wells, G., Boers, M., et al. (2001). Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome measures in rheumatology. Minimal clinically important difference. Journal of Rheumatology, 28(2), 400–405.PubMed
40.
Silverstein, B. A., Viikari-Juntura, E., Fan, Z. J., Bonauto, D. K., Bao, S., Smith, C. (2006). Natural course of nontraurnatic rotator cuff tendinitis and shoulder symptoms in a working population. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 32(2), 99–108.
41.
Baron, S., Hales, T., Hurrell, J. (1996). Evaluation of symptom surveys for occupational musculoskeletal disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(6), 609–617.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Stock, S. R. (2000). A brief overview of the Neck and Upper Limb Index (NULI). Physical Medicine Research Foundation.
43.
Mchorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical-practice—Are available health-status surveys adequate. Quality of Life Research, 4(4), 293–307.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Pransky, G., Snyder, T., Dembe, A., & Himmelstein, J. (1999). Under-reporting of work-related disorders in the workplace: A case study and review of the literature. Ergonomics, 42(1), 171–182.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Burdorf, A., Naaktgeboren, B., & Post, W. (1998). Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal sickness absence and return to work among welders and metal workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 55(7), 490–495.PubMed
46.
Magder, L. S., & Fix, A. D. (2003). Optimal choice of a cut point for a quantitative diagnostic test performed for research purposes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 56(10), 956–962.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Pepe, M. S., Janes, H., Longton, G., Leisenring, W., Newcomb, P. (2004). Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159(9), 882–890.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Davis, A. M., Beaton, D. E., Hudak, P., Amadio, P., Bombardier, C., Cole, D., et al. (1999). Measuring disability of the upper extremity: A rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. Journal of Hand Therapy, 12, 269–274.PubMed
49.
Punnett, L., & van der Beek, A. J. (2000). A comparison of approaches to modeling the relationship between ergonomic exposures and upper extremity disorders. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 37(6), 645–655.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Kirkley, A., Griffin, S., Mclintock, H., & Ng, L. (1998). The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability—The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). American Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(6), 764–772.PubMed
51.
Bernard, B. (1997). Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97–141.
52.
Westgaard, R. H., & Winkel, J. (1997). Ergonomic intervention research for improved musculoskeletal health: A critical review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 20(6), 463–500.CrossRef
53.
Smith, M. J., Karsh, B. T., & Moro, B. P. (1999). A review of research on interventions to control musculoskeletal disorders. Work-related Musculoskeletal disorders: Report, workshop summary, and workshop papers. National Research Council, pp. 200–229. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54.
Hamrick, C. (2001). Proof that ergonomics works: Combined results of over 100 independent ergonomic intervention studies. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th annual meeting 2001, pp. 987–91.
55.
Liberty Mutual. (2001). A majority of U.S. Businesses Report workplace safety delivers a return on investment, Boston.
56.
Rosenstock, L., & Lee, L. J. (2002). Attacks on science: The risks to evidence-based policy. American Journal of Public Health, 92(1), 14–18.PubMedCrossRef
57.
NIOSH (1997). Elements of Ergonomics Programs, A primer based on workplace evaluations of musculoskeletal disorders, DHHS(NIOSH) No. 97–117. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
58.
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of a Disability Instrument to Identify Workers Likely to Develop Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders
Authors
Bert Stover
Barbara Silverstein
Thomas Wickizer
Diane P. Martin
Joel Kaufman
Publication date
01-06-2007
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9083-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2007

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2007 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Psychosocial Factors Related to Return to Work Following Rehabilitation of Whiplash Injuries

Original Paper

Work Factors Related to Psychological and Health-Related Distress Among Employees with Chronic Illnesses

Original Paper

Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Urban Bus Drivers of Hong Kong

Original Paper

Are Pain Intensity and Pain Related Fear Related to Functional Capacity Evaluation Performances of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain?

OriginalPaper

Level of Distress Among Workers Undergoing Work Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Disorders

Original Paper

Association of Low Back Pain, Impairment, Disability & Work Limitations in Nurses