Top

Published in:

01-12-2008 | Original Paper

Real Limits in the Virtual World: Self-Limiting Behavior of Internet Gamblers

Authors: Sarah E. Nelson, Debi A. LaPlante, Allyson J. Peller, Anja Schumann, Richard A. LaBrie, Howard J. Shaffer

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 4/2008

Abstract

The recent expansion of Internet gambling has stimulated debate, policy, and research on this relatively new phenomenon and its potential consequences. The current study focuses on bettors experiencing problems by sampling Internet gamblers who imposed limits on the amount they were allowed to deposit to a betting site. We analyzed the betting transactions over 18 months of all gamblers who subscribed to an online betting site in February, 2005 (N = 47,134), 567 of whom utilized the site’s self-limit feature. Self-limiting gamblers played a wider variety of games and placed more bets than others prior to imposing limits. After imposing limits, self-limiters reduced their activity, but did not reduce the amount they wagered per bet. Time spent gambling, not just money spent, appears to be an important indicator of gambling problems. Self-limit programs appear to be promising options for Internet gamblers at-risk for gambling problems.

Previous analysis of this sample (LaBrie et al. 2007) empirically established that the top 1% of the sample on certain variables exhibited behavior that was extreme compared to the rest of the sample. Based on that finding, we repeated the comparisons between SLs and non-SLs presented in Table 1 excluding non-SLs whose bets per day, stakes per bet, total wagered, or net loss placed them in the top 1% of the sample. (Frequency and % loss did not exhibit the same discontinuous distribution.) This resulted in 1,410 non-SLs being excluded. These comparisons revealed a pattern of differences identical to the pattern presented in the Table with the following exception: for live-action betting and betting on other games, euros per bet were no longer significantly different between SLs and non-SLs.

American Gaming Association. (2003). Responsible gaming rules of conduct. Retrieved September 1st, 2007, from http://www.americangaming.org/programs/responsiblegaming/code_public.cfm.

American Gaming Association. (2006). 2006 State of the states: The AGA survey of casino entertainment. Washington D.C.: American Gaming Association.

Currie, S. R., Hodgins, D. C., Wang, J., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 101, 570–580. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01392.x.

Griffiths, M. D. (2001). Internet gambling: Preliminary results of the first U.K. prevalence study. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues Retrieved June 3, 2004, from http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/research/griffiths_article.html.

Griffiths, M. D. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 557–568. doi:10.1089/109493103322725333.CrossRef

Ialomiteanu, A., & Adlaf, E. M. (2002). Internet gambling among Ontario adults. eGambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues Retrieved June 3, 2004, from http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/research/ialomiteanu_adlaf_article.html.

LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007a). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of internet sports gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 347–362. doi:10.1007/s10899-007-9067-3.CrossRef

LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., Peller, A. J., Caro, G., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007b). Missouri casino self-excluders: Distributions across time and space. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(2), 231–243. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9037-1.PubMedCrossRef

LaBrie, R. A., Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A., & Wechsler, H. (2003). Correlates of college student gambling in the United States. Journal of American College Health, 52(2), 53–62.PubMedCrossRef

Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: A focus on Internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(1), 76–79. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.16.1.76.PubMedCrossRef

Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460. doi:10.1023/A:1009488308348.PubMedCrossRef

Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9032-6.PubMedCrossRef

LaPlante, D. A., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Population trends in internet sports gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2399–2414.CrossRef

Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.PubMed

Meerkerk, G.-J., Van Den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., & Garretsen, H. F. L. (2006). Predicting compulsive Internet use: It’s all about sex!. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(1), 95–103. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.95.CrossRef

Napolitano, F. (2003). The self-exclusion program: Legal and clinical considerations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(3), 303–315. doi:10.1023/A:1024259521729.PubMedCrossRef

No More Gambling. (2005). The dangers of online gambling. Retrieved August 16, 2007, from http://www.nomorebets.com/online-gambling.html.

Nowatzki, N. R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues. International Gambling Studies, 2, 3–25. doi:10.1080/14459790208732297.CrossRef

Nower, L. M., & Blaszczynski, A. P. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences among self-excluded casino problem gamblers: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 81–99. doi:10.1007/s10899-005-9004-2.PubMedCrossRef

Petry, N. M. (2006). Internet gambling: An emerging concern in family practice medicine? Family Practice, 23, 421–426. doi:10.1093/fampra/cml005.PubMedCrossRef

Petry, N. M., & Mallya, S. (2004). Gambling participation and problems among employees at a university health center. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), 155–170. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000022307.09299.f5.PubMedCrossRef

Richtel, M. (2004, March 26). Trade group says U.S. ban on Net gambling violates global law. New York Times.

Slutske, W. S. (2006). Natural recovery and treatment-seeking in pathological gambling: Results of two U.S. national surveys. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(2), 297–302. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.2.297.PubMedCrossRef

Smeaton, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Internet gambling and social responsibility: An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 49–57. doi:10.1089/109493104322820110.CrossRef

Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Wieczorek, W. F., Tidwell, M.-C., & Parker, J. (2002). Gambling participation in the U.S.—Results from a national survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313–337. doi:10.1023/A:1021019915591.PubMedCrossRef

Woodruff, C., & Gregory, S. (2005). Profile of Internet gamblers: Betting on the future. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 9(1), 1–14.

Title: Real Limits in the Virtual World: Self-Limiting Behavior of Internet Gamblers
Authors: Sarah E. Nelson
Debi A. LaPlante
Allyson J. Peller
Anja Schumann
Richard A. LaBrie
Howard J. Shaffer
Publication date: 01-12-2008
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 4/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-008-9106-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Real Limits in the Virtual World: Self-Limiting Behavior of Internet Gamblers

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Parameters for Safer Gambling Behavior: Examining the Empirical Research

Offspring of Parents with Gambling Problems: Adjustment Problems and Explanatory Mechanisms

Prevalence of Problem and Pathological Gambling in Parkinson’s Disease

Designing a Longitudinal Cohort Study of Gambling in Alberta: Rationale, Methods, and Challenges

Improved Self-exclusion Program: Preliminary Results

The Validity and Reliability of Four Measures of Gambling Behaviour in a Sample of Singapore University Students