Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2014

01-08-2014 | Next Generation Genetic Counseling

Factors Which Impact the Delivery of Genetic Risk Assessment Services Focused on Inherited Cancer Genomics: Expanding the Role and Reach of Certified Genetics Professionals

Authors: Cristi Radford, Anya Prince, Karen Lewis, Tuya Pal

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

There is tremendous excitement about the promise of new genomic technologies to transform medical practice and improve patient care. Although the full power of genetic diagnosis has not yet been realized, paradigms of clinical decision-making are changing. In fact, recent policy level changes to promote genetic counseling by certified genetics professionals (GP) such as genetic counselors and clinical geneticists, are occurring at both the payer and state level. However, there remain opportunities to develop policies within the United States to: 1) enhance the access to the limited workforce of GPs; 2) revise reimbursement schemes such that costs to deliver these services may be recouped by institutions with GPs; and 3) protect against the potential for discrimination based on genetic information. Although many of these issues predate advances in genomic technologies, they are exacerbated by them, with increasing access and awareness as costs of testing decrease. Consequently, evolving shifts in national policies poise GPs to serve as a hub of information and may be instrumental in facilitating new models to deliver genetics-based care through promoting academic-community partnerships and interfacing with non-GPs. As we acknowledge the potential for genomics to revolutionize medical practice, the expertise of GPs may be leveraged to facilitate incorporation of this information into mainstream medicine.
Literature
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology; ACOG Committee on Genetics; Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (2009). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 103: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 113(4), 957–966. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins--Gynecology; ACOG Committee on Genetics; Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (2009). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 103: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 113(4), 957–966.
go back to reference Acheson, L. S., Stange, K. C., & Zyzanski, S. (2005). Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians. Genetics in Medicine, 7(7), 501–508.PubMedCrossRef Acheson, L. S., Stange, K. C., & Zyzanski, S. (2005). Clinical genetics issues encountered by family physicians. Genetics in Medicine, 7(7), 501–508.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baars, M. J., Henneman, L., & Ten Kate, L. P. (2005). Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genetics in Medicine, 7(9), 605–610.PubMedCrossRef Baars, M. J., Henneman, L., & Ten Kate, L. P. (2005). Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genetics in Medicine, 7(9), 605–610.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baruch, S., & Hudson, K. (2008). Civilian and military genetics: nondiscrimination policy in a post-GINA world. American Journal of Human Genetics, 83(4), 435–444.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Baruch, S., & Hudson, K. (2008). Civilian and military genetics: nondiscrimination policy in a post-GINA world. American Journal of Human Genetics, 83(4), 435–444.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, S. A., & McIlvried, D. E. (2013). Improving access with a collaborative approach to cancer genetic counseling services: a pilot study. Community Oncology, 10(8), 227–234.CrossRef Cohen, S. A., & McIlvried, D. E. (2013). Improving access with a collaborative approach to cancer genetic counseling services: a pilot study. Community Oncology, 10(8), 227–234.CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen, S. A., McIlvried, D., & Schnieders, J. (2009). A collaborative approach to genetic testing: a community hospital’s experience. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(6), 530–533.PubMedCrossRef Cohen, S. A., McIlvried, D., & Schnieders, J. (2009). A collaborative approach to genetic testing: a community hospital’s experience. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(6), 530–533.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dancey, J. E., Bedard, P. L., Onetto, N., & Hudson, T. J. (2012). The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell, 148(3), 409–420.PubMedCrossRef Dancey, J. E., Bedard, P. L., Onetto, N., & Hudson, T. J. (2012). The genetic basis for cancer treatment decisions. Cell, 148(3), 409–420.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Giardiello, F. M., Brensinger, J. D., Petersen, G. M., Luce, M. C., Hylind, L. M., Bacon, J. A., et al. (1997). The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(12), 823–827.PubMedCrossRef Giardiello, F. M., Brensinger, J. D., Petersen, G. M., Luce, M. C., Hylind, L. M., Bacon, J. A., et al. (1997). The use and interpretation of commercial APC gene testing for familial adenomatous polyposis. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(12), 823–827.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., et al. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7):565–574.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Green, R. C., Berg, J. S., Grody, W. W., Kalia, S. S., Korf, B. R., Martin, C. L., et al. (2013). ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine, 15(7):565–574.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Grosse, S. D., & Khoury, M. J. (2006). What is the clinical utility of genetic testing? Genetics in Medicine, 8(7), 448–450.PubMedCrossRef Grosse, S. D., & Khoury, M. J. (2006). What is the clinical utility of genetic testing? Genetics in Medicine, 8(7), 448–450.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. (2009). Innovations in service delivery in the age of genomics: Workshop summary. Washing, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine. (2009). Innovations in service delivery in the age of genomics: Workshop summary. Washing, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
go back to reference Leib, J. R., Hoodfar, E., Haidle, J. L., & Nagy, R. (2008). The new genetic privacy law. Community Oncology, 5(6), 124–127.CrossRef Leib, J. R., Hoodfar, E., Haidle, J. L., & Nagy, R. (2008). The new genetic privacy law. Community Oncology, 5(6), 124–127.CrossRef
go back to reference MacDonald, D. J., Blazer, K. R., & Weitzel, J. N. (2010). Extending comprehensive cancer center expertise in clinical cancer genetics and genomics to diverse communities: the power of partnership. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 8(5), 615–624.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef MacDonald, D. J., Blazer, K. R., & Weitzel, J. N. (2010). Extending comprehensive cancer center expertise in clinical cancer genetics and genomics to diverse communities: the power of partnership. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 8(5), 615–624.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference McPherson, E., Zaleski, C., Benishek, K., McCarty, C. A., Giampietro, P. F., Reynolds, K., et al. (2008). Clinical genetics provider real-time workflow study. Genetics in Medicine, 10(9), 699–706.PubMedCrossRef McPherson, E., Zaleski, C., Benishek, K., McCarty, C. A., Giampietro, P. F., Reynolds, K., et al. (2008). Clinical genetics provider real-time workflow study. Genetics in Medicine, 10(9), 699–706.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. (2013). Genetic evaluation and management (page 48). Retrieved June 15, 2013. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. (2013). Genetic evaluation and management (page 48). Retrieved June 15, 2013.
go back to reference Riley, B. D., Culver, J. O., Skrzynia, C., Senter, L. A., Peters, J. A., Costalas, J. W., et al. (2012). Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(2), 151–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-011-9462-x.PubMedCrossRef Riley, B. D., Culver, J. O., Skrzynia, C., Senter, L. A., Peters, J. A., Costalas, J. W., et al. (2012). Essential elements of genetic cancer risk assessment, counseling, and testing: updated recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(2), 151–161. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10897-011-9462-x.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Grumet, S. C., et al. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(2), 83–114.CrossRef Trepanier, A., Ahrens, M., McKinnon, W., Peters, J., Stopfer, J., Grumet, S. C., et al. (2004). Genetic cancer risk assessment and counseling: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(2), 83–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Vig, H. S., Armstrong, J., Egleston, B. L., Mazar, C., Toscano, M., Bradbury, A. R., et al. (2009). Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 13(6), 735–741.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Vig, H. S., Armstrong, J., Egleston, B. L., Mazar, C., Toscano, M., Bradbury, A. R., et al. (2009). Cancer genetic risk assessment and referral patterns in primary care. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 13(6), 735–741.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Wideroff, L., Vadaparampil, S. T., Greene, M. H., Taplin, S., Olson, L., & Freedman, A. N. (2005). Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians. Journal of Medical Genetics, 42(10), 749–755.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wideroff, L., Vadaparampil, S. T., Greene, M. H., Taplin, S., Olson, L., & Freedman, A. N. (2005). Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians. Journal of Medical Genetics, 42(10), 749–755.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Wilkins-Haug, L., Erickson, K., Hill, L., Power, M., Holzman, G. B., & Schulkin, J. (2000). Obstetrician-gynecologists’ opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 9(8), 873–879.CrossRef Wilkins-Haug, L., Erickson, K., Hill, L., Power, M., Holzman, G. B., & Schulkin, J. (2000). Obstetrician-gynecologists’ opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 9(8), 873–879.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors Which Impact the Delivery of Genetic Risk Assessment Services Focused on Inherited Cancer Genomics: Expanding the Role and Reach of Certified Genetics Professionals
Authors
Cristi Radford
Anya Prince
Karen Lewis
Tuya Pal
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9668-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2014 Go to the issue