Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2006

01-12-2006 | Original Research

A Survey of Patients’ Experiences with the Cancer Genetic Counseling Process: Recommendations for Cancer Genetics Programs

Authors: Dana T. Kausmeyer, Eugene J. Lengerich, Brenda C. Kluhsman, Dorothy Morrone, Gregory R. Harper, Maria J. Baker

Published in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

In order to promote ongoing quality improvement of not only the Penn State Cancer Genetics Program, but also other cancer risk assessment programs throughout the country, we developed, piloted and conducted a survey to explore patient expectations, experiences, and satisfaction with the cancer genetic counseling process. The comprehensive survey was mailed to 340 eligible patients, 156 (45.9%) of whom returned the completed survey within the allotted time. Responses to closed-ended questions were tallied and open-ended questions were content analyzed. Major findings show that: (1) Patients were seeking cancer-related information and support throughout the cancer risk assessment process and were interested in participating in available research studies; (2) The setting in which patients are seen for cancer risk assessment may pose potential emotional ramifications; (3) Misperceptions regarding insurance discrimination and lack of insurance coverage persist; (4) Patients view the genetic counselor as responsible for updating them about new discoveries. Specific recommendations for cancer genetics programs are included.
Literature
go back to reference Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. J Genet Couns, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRef Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. J Genet Couns, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRef
go back to reference Bonadona, V., Saltel, P., Desseigne, F., Mignotte, H., Saurin, J.-C., Wang, Q., et al. (2002). Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Reactions and behavior after the disclosure of a positive test result. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev, 11, 97–104. Bonadona, V., Saltel, P., Desseigne, F., Mignotte, H., Saurin, J.-C., Wang, Q., et al. (2002). Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Reactions and behavior after the disclosure of a positive test result. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers & Prev, 11, 97–104.
go back to reference Collins, V., Halliday, J., Warren, R., & Williamson, R. (2000). Assessment of education and counseling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic. Clin Genet, 57, 48–55.PubMedCrossRef Collins, V., Halliday, J., Warren, R., & Williamson, R. (2000). Assessment of education and counseling offered by a familial colorectal cancer clinic. Clin Genet, 57, 48–55.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Freyer, G., Dazord, A., Schlumberger, M., Conte-Devolx, B., Ligneau, B., Trillet-Lenoir, V., et al. (1999). Psychosocial impact of genetic testing in familial medullary-thyroid carcinoma: A multicentric pilot-evaluation. Ann Oncol, 10(1), 87–95.PubMedCrossRef Freyer, G., Dazord, A., Schlumberger, M., Conte-Devolx, B., Ligneau, B., Trillet-Lenoir, V., et al. (1999). Psychosocial impact of genetic testing in familial medullary-thyroid carcinoma: A multicentric pilot-evaluation. Ann Oncol, 10(1), 87–95.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Geer, K. P., Ropka, M. E., Cohn, W. F., Jones, S. M., & Miesfeldt, A. (2001). Factors influencing patients’ decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services. J Genet Counsel, 10(1), 25–40.CrossRef Geer, K. P., Ropka, M. E., Cohn, W. F., Jones, S. M., & Miesfeldt, A. (2001). Factors influencing patients’ decisions to decline cancer genetic counseling services. J Genet Counsel, 10(1), 25–40.CrossRef
go back to reference Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Wagner Baker, M., Friedman, L. C., Harper, G. R., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2005). Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: Effects on duration and content of counseling sessions. Genet Med, 7(4), 221–229.PubMedCrossRef Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Wagner Baker, M., Friedman, L. C., Harper, G. R., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2005). Use of an educational computer program before genetic counseling for breast cancer susceptibility: Effects on duration and content of counseling sessions. Genet Med, 7(4), 221–229.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Wagner Baker, M., Friedman, L. C., Harper, G. R., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2004). Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: A randomized trial. JAMA, 292(4), 442–452.PubMedCrossRef Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Wagner Baker, M., Friedman, L. C., Harper, G. R., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2004). Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: A randomized trial. JAMA, 292(4), 442–452.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Green, M. J. (1998–2000). Breast Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing, Version 2.0. CD-ROM. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. Green, M. J. (1998–2000). Breast Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing, Version 2.0. CD-ROM. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.
go back to reference Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Educ Couns, 35(1), 27–34.PubMedCrossRef Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Educ Couns, 35(1), 27–34.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hirschhorn, K., et al. (1999). Duty to re-contact. Genet Med, 1(4), 171–172.PubMed Hirschhorn, K., et al. (1999). Duty to re-contact. Genet Med, 1(4), 171–172.PubMed
go back to reference Julian-Reynier, C., Eisinger, F., Chabal, F., Aurran, Y., Bignon, Y. –J., Nogues, C., et al. (1998). Cancer genetic clinics: Why do women who already have cancer attend? Eur J Cancer, 34(10), 1549–1553.PubMedCrossRef Julian-Reynier, C., Eisinger, F., Chabal, F., Aurran, Y., Bignon, Y. –J., Nogues, C., et al. (1998). Cancer genetic clinics: Why do women who already have cancer attend? Eur J Cancer, 34(10), 1549–1553.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kash, K. M., Ortega-Verdejo, K., Dabney, M. K., Holland, J. C., Miller, D. G., & Osborne, M. P. (2000). Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics: Women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Semin Surg Oncol, 18, 333–338.PubMedCrossRef Kash, K. M., Ortega-Verdejo, K., Dabney, M. K., Holland, J. C., Miller, D. G., & Osborne, M. P. (2000). Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics: Women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Semin Surg Oncol, 18, 333–338.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lea, D. H. (1996). Emerging quality improvement measures in genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel, 5(3), 123–137.CrossRef Lea, D. H. (1996). Emerging quality improvement measures in genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel, 5(3), 123–137.CrossRef
go back to reference NSGC Familial Cancer Risk Counseling Special Interest Group Directory (2003). NSGC Familial Cancer Risk Counseling Special Interest Group Directory (2003).
go back to reference Rosenthal, E. (2005). Patient attitudes towards follow-up letters in the cancer genetics clinic. 24th Annual Education Conference, Los Angeles, CA. Rosenthal, E. (2005). Patient attitudes towards follow-up letters in the cancer genetics clinic. 24th Annual Education Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
go back to reference Stacey, D., DeGrasse, C., & Johnston, L. (2002). Addressing the support needs of women at high risk for breast cancer: Evidence-based care by advanced practice nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum, 29(6), E77–E84.PubMed Stacey, D., DeGrasse, C., & Johnston, L. (2002). Addressing the support needs of women at high risk for breast cancer: Evidence-based care by advanced practice nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum, 29(6), E77–E84.PubMed
go back to reference Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Davidson, J., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S., et al. (1999). The impact of genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 79(5–6), 868–874.PubMedCrossRef Watson, M., Lloyd, S., Davidson, J., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S., et al. (1999). The impact of genetic counseling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer. Br J Cancer, 79(5–6), 868–874.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Survey of Patients’ Experiences with the Cancer Genetic Counseling Process: Recommendations for Cancer Genetics Programs
Authors
Dana T. Kausmeyer
Eugene J. Lengerich
Brenda C. Kluhsman
Dorothy Morrone
Gregory R. Harper
Maria J. Baker
Publication date
01-12-2006
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-006-9039-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Journal of Genetic Counseling 6/2006 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Why Me? Why Not Me?