Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2023

03-05-2023 | Compartment Syndrome | Original Research

Feasibility analysis of a novel non-invasive ultrasonographic method for the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in the intensive care unit

Authors: Kay Choong See, Salar Tayebi, Chew Lai Sum, Jason Phua, Johan Stiens, Robert Wise, Amartya Mukhopadhyay, Manu L.N.G. Malbrain

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 5/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is an important vital sign in critically ill patients and has a negative impact on morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to validate a novel non-invasive ultrasonographic approach to IAP measurement against the gold standard intra-bladder pressure (IBP) method. We conducted a prospective observational study in an adult medical ICU of a university hospital. IAP measurements using ultrasonography by two independent operators, with different experience levels (experienced, IAPUS1; inexperienced, IAPUS2), were compared with the gold standard IBP method performed by a third blinded operator. For the ultrasonographic method, decremental external pressure was applied on the anterior abdominal wall using a bottle filled with decreasing volumes of water. Ultrasonography looked at peritoneal rebound upon brisk withdrawal of the external pressure. The loss of peritoneal rebound was identified as the point where IAP was equal to or above the applied external pressure. Twenty-one patients underwent 74 IAP readings (range 2–15 mmHg). The number of readings per patient was 3.5 ± 2.5, and the abdominal wall thickness was 24.6 ± 13.1 mm. Bland and Altman’s analysis showed a bias (0.39 and 0.61 mmHg) and precision (1.38 and 1.51 mmHg) for the comparison of IAPUS1 and IAPUS2 and vs. IBP, respectively with small limits of agreement that were in line with the research guidelines of the Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS). Our novel ultrasound-based IAP method displayed good correlation and agreement between IAP and IBP at levels up to 15 mmHg and is an excellent solution for quick decision-making in critically ill patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carter BM, Howard C. A 6th vital sign–potential use of nasogastric tube for intra-abdominal pressure monitoring method to detect feeding intolerance in very low birth-weight Preterm Infants (< 1500 g). Adv Neonatal Care. 2015;15(3):176–81.CrossRefPubMed Carter BM, Howard C. A 6th vital sign–potential use of nasogastric tube for intra-abdominal pressure monitoring method to detect feeding intolerance in very low birth-weight Preterm Infants (< 1500 g). Adv Neonatal Care. 2015;15(3):176–81.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick AW, et al. WSACS–The Abdominal Compartment Society. A Society dedicated to the study of the physiology and pathophysiology of the abdominal compartment and its interactions with all organ systems. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(3):191–4.CrossRefPubMed Kirkpatrick AW, et al. WSACS–The Abdominal Compartment Society. A Society dedicated to the study of the physiology and pathophysiology of the abdominal compartment and its interactions with all organ systems. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(3):191–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick AW, et al. Update from the Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: past, present, and future beyond Banff 2017. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(2):83–7.CrossRefPubMed Kirkpatrick AW, et al. Update from the Abdominal Compartment Society (WSACS) on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: past, present, and future beyond Banff 2017. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(2):83–7.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sugrue M, et al. Clinical examination is an inaccurate predictor of intraabdominal pressure. World J Surg. 2002;26(12):1428–31.CrossRefPubMed Sugrue M, et al. Clinical examination is an inaccurate predictor of intraabdominal pressure. World J Surg. 2002;26(12):1428–31.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jacobs R et al. Fluid Management, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Life (Basel), 2022. 12(9). Jacobs R et al. Fluid Management, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Life (Basel), 2022. 12(9).
6.
go back to reference Minini A, Emara MM, Malbrain MLNG et al. Polycompartment Syndrome, in Compartment Syndrome, F. Coccolini, Editors. 2021, Springer International Publishing: Cham. p. 101–121. Minini A, Emara MM, Malbrain MLNG et al. Polycompartment Syndrome, in Compartment Syndrome, F. Coccolini, Editors. 2021, Springer International Publishing: Cham. p. 101–121.
7.
go back to reference De Laet I, Hoste E, De Waele JJ. Transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurement using minimal instillation volumes: how low can we go? Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(4):746–50.CrossRefPubMed De Laet I, Hoste E, De Waele JJ. Transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurement using minimal instillation volumes: how low can we go? Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(4):746–50.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference De Waele JJ, et al. The effect of different reference transducer positions on intra-abdominal pressure measurement: a multicenter analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(7):1299–303.CrossRefPubMed De Waele JJ, et al. The effect of different reference transducer positions on intra-abdominal pressure measurement: a multicenter analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(7):1299–303.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Al-Hwiesh A, et al. Intraperitoneal pressure and intra-abdominal pressure: are they the same? Perit Dial Int. 2011;31(3):315–9.CrossRefPubMed Al-Hwiesh A, et al. Intraperitoneal pressure and intra-abdominal pressure: are they the same? Perit Dial Int. 2011;31(3):315–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Khanna AK, Rola P, Malbrain M. Biomarkers for intra-abdominal pressure: another tool in the toolbox? Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022;11(6):461–3.CrossRefPubMed Khanna AK, Rola P, Malbrain M. Biomarkers for intra-abdominal pressure: another tool in the toolbox? Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022;11(6):461–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference David M, et al. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring by Surface Bioimpedance Estimation. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2019;1272(1):012013. David M, et al. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring by Surface Bioimpedance Estimation. J Phys: Conf Ser. 2019;1272(1):012013.
12.
go back to reference Tang H, et al. Deep Domain Adaptation for Predicting Intra-Abdominal pressure with multichannel attention Fusion Radar Chip. Adv Intell Syst. 2022;4(5):2100209.CrossRef Tang H, et al. Deep Domain Adaptation for Predicting Intra-Abdominal pressure with multichannel attention Fusion Radar Chip. Adv Intell Syst. 2022;4(5):2100209.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tayebi S, et al. Non-invasive intra-abdominal pressure measurement by means of transient Radar Method: in Vitro Validation of a Novel Radar-Based Sensor. Sensors. 2021;21(18):5999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tayebi S, et al. Non-invasive intra-abdominal pressure measurement by means of transient Radar Method: in Vitro Validation of a Novel Radar-Based Sensor. Sensors. 2021;21(18):5999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference David M, et al. Non-invasive indirect monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure using microwave reflectometry: system design and proof-of-concept clinical trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35(6):1437–43.CrossRefPubMed David M, et al. Non-invasive indirect monitoring of intra-abdominal pressure using microwave reflectometry: system design and proof-of-concept clinical trial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35(6):1437–43.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cheatham ML, et al. The impact of body position on intra-abdominal pressure measurement: a multicenter analysis*. Crit Care Med; 2009. Cheatham ML, et al. The impact of body position on intra-abdominal pressure measurement: a multicenter analysis*. Crit Care Med; 2009.
16.
go back to reference Cheatham ML et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations Intensive Care Med, 2007. 33(6): p. 951 – 62. Cheatham ML et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations Intensive Care Med, 2007. 33(6): p. 951 – 62.
17.
go back to reference Malbrain ML. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(3):357–71.CrossRefPubMed Malbrain ML. Different techniques to measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP): time for a critical re-appraisal. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(3):357–71.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Malbrain ML, et al. Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(5):822–9.CrossRefPubMed Malbrain ML, et al. Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(5):822–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tayebi S et al. Pre-Clinical Validation of A Novel Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement Equipment (SERENNO) Life (Basel), 2022. 12(8). Tayebi S et al. Pre-Clinical Validation of A Novel Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement Equipment (SERENNO) Life (Basel), 2022. 12(8).
22.
go back to reference Malbrain ML, et al. Can the abdominal perimeter be used as an accurate estimation of intra-abdominal pressure? Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1):316–9.CrossRefPubMed Malbrain ML, et al. Can the abdominal perimeter be used as an accurate estimation of intra-abdominal pressure? Crit Care Med. 2009;37(1):316–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference van Ramshorst GH, et al. Non-invasive measurement of intra-abdominal pressure: a preliminary study. Physiol Meas. 2008;29(8):N41–7.CrossRefPubMed van Ramshorst GH, et al. Non-invasive measurement of intra-abdominal pressure: a preliminary study. Physiol Meas. 2008;29(8):N41–7.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Tayebi S, et al. A concise overview of non-invasive intra-abdominal pressure measurement techniques: from bench to bedside. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35(1):51–70.CrossRefPubMed Tayebi S, et al. A concise overview of non-invasive intra-abdominal pressure measurement techniques: from bench to bedside. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021;35(1):51–70.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Feasibility analysis of a novel non-invasive ultrasonographic method for the measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in the intensive care unit
Authors
Kay Choong See
Salar Tayebi
Chew Lai Sum
Jason Phua
Johan Stiens
Robert Wise
Amartya Mukhopadhyay
Manu L.N.G. Malbrain
Publication date
03-05-2023
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 5/2023
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-023-01024-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2023

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 5/2023 Go to the issue