Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2013

01-12-2013 | Original Research

The impact of systemic vascular resistance on the accuracy of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery: a prospective observational comparison study

Authors: Yohei Sotomi, Katsuomi Iwakura, Yoshiharu Higuchi, Kazuo Abe, Junko Yoshida, Takafumi Masai, Kenshi Fujii

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

FloTrac/Vigileo™ system is based on arterial pressure waveform analysis arterial pressure-based CO (APCO). Therefore, systemic vascular resistance (SVR) can influence the accuracy of APCO. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between SVR and the accuracy of APCO. We managed 50 consecutive patients in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery with FloTrac/Vigileo™ system (v. 3.02) and Swan–Ganz catheter/Vigilance™ system pulmonary artery catheter-based CO (PAC-CO) simultaneously. Continuous hemodynamic measurement using both methods was performed every 20 s from the induction of anesthesia to PAC removal 4 h after extubation. A total of 11,092 (intraoperative), 38,455 (postoperative, pre-extubation), and 44,235 (postoperative, post-extubation) data pairs were finally analyzed. Bland–Altman analysis revealed that in the intraoperative [postoperative pre-extubation, post-extubation] period, the bias was 0.5 [0.1, 0.0] L/min and the limits of agreement ranged from −2.4 to 3.3 [−2.2 to 2.4, −2.4 to 2.3] L/min. The percentage error was 60.3 [54.5, 48.5] %. Regression analysis of the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and the bias between APCO and PAC-CO showed that the bias was positively correlated to the SVRI. Subanalysis based on SVR with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient revealed that relatively satisfactory concordance was found in the normal-SVR group (concordance correlation coefficient ρ c = 0.51–0.56) regardless of vasoactive agent use. The accuracy of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ System (v. 3.02) is relatively satisfactory in the condition with normal SVR regardless of vasoactive agent use. Positive correlation between the bias and SVR can be the clue to the more effective use of FloTrac/Vigileo™ system.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Didier P, Gayat E. Which general intensive care unit patients can benefit from placement of the pulmonary artery catheter? Crit Care. 2006;10:S7.CrossRef Didier P, Gayat E. Which general intensive care unit patients can benefit from placement of the pulmonary artery catheter? Crit Care. 2006;10:S7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Peters SG, Afessa B, Decker PA, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Scott JP. Increase risk associated with pulmonary artery catheterization in the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2003;18:166–71.PubMedCrossRef Peters SG, Afessa B, Decker PA, Schroeder DR, Offord KP, Scott JP. Increase risk associated with pulmonary artery catheterization in the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2003;18:166–71.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:523–7.PubMedCrossRef Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:523–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Headley JM. Arterial pressure-based technologies: a new trend in cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2006;18:179–87.PubMedCrossRef Headley JM. Arterial pressure-based technologies: a new trend in cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2006;18:179–87.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gödje O, Friedl R, Hannekum A. Accuracy of beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis in hemodynamical unstable patients. Med Sci Monit. 2001;7:1344–50.PubMed Gödje O, Friedl R, Hannekum A. Accuracy of beat-to-beat cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis in hemodynamical unstable patients. Med Sci Monit. 2001;7:1344–50.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Slagt C, Beute J, Hoeksema M, Malagon I, Mulder JW, Groeneveld JA. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis without calibration versus thermodilution in septic shock: evolving accuracy of software versions. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:550–4.PubMedCrossRef Slagt C, Beute J, Hoeksema M, Malagon I, Mulder JW, Groeneveld JA. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis without calibration versus thermodilution in septic shock: evolving accuracy of software versions. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:550–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Nishino K, Yasui N. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009;21:218–25.PubMedCrossRef Mutoh T, Ishikawa T, Nishino K, Yasui N. Evaluation of the FloTrac uncalibrated continuous cardiac output system for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009;21:218–25.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:257–64.PubMedCrossRef Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:257–64.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, Junker C, Van Nuffelen M, Hüter L, Ching W, Michard F, Vincent JL. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:233–40.PubMedCrossRef De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, Junker C, Van Nuffelen M, Hüter L, Ching W, Michard F, Vincent JL. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:233–40.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zimmermann A, Steinwendner J, Hofbauer S, Kirnbauer M, Schneider J, Moser L, Pauser G. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac system has been improved follow-up after a software update: a blinded comparative study of 30 cardiosurgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:929–31.PubMedCrossRef Zimmermann A, Steinwendner J, Hofbauer S, Kirnbauer M, Schneider J, Moser L, Pauser G. The accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac system has been improved follow-up after a software update: a blinded comparative study of 30 cardiosurgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:929–31.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mayer J, Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:804–8.PubMedCrossRef Mayer J, Suttner S. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:804–8.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Saraceni E, Rossi S, Persona P, Dan M, Rizzi S, Meroni M, Ori C. Comparison of two methods for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:690–4.PubMedCrossRef Saraceni E, Rossi S, Persona P, Dan M, Rizzi S, Meroni M, Ori C. Comparison of two methods for cardiac output measurement in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106:690–4.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:344–9.PubMedCrossRef Opdam HI, Wan L, Bellomo R. A pilot assessment of the FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:344–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Müller M, von Heymann C. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care. 2006;21:R164.CrossRef Sander M, Spies CD, Grubitzsch H, Foer A, Müller M, von Heymann C. Comparison of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis in cardiac surgery patients with thermodilution cardiac output measurements. Crit Care. 2006;21:R164.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255–68.PubMedCrossRef Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45:255–68.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–60.PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8:135–60.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:309–11.PubMedCrossRef Myles PS, Cui J. Using the Bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:309–11.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220–35.PubMedCrossRef Peyton PJ, Chong SW. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1220–35.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Levett JM, Replogle RL. Thermodilution cardiac output: acritical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res. 1979;27:392–404.PubMedCrossRef Levett JM, Replogle RL. Thermodilution cardiac output: acritical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res. 1979;27:392–404.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sotomi Y, Nishiyama C, Shimizu T, Kita T, Maki N, Sasaki S. Reliability of a less-invasive cardiac output monitor in the perioperative period of a patient with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Masui. 2011;60:203–7.PubMed Sotomi Y, Nishiyama C, Shimizu T, Kita T, Maki N, Sasaki S. Reliability of a less-invasive cardiac output monitor in the perioperative period of a patient with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Masui. 2011;60:203–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, Bindi L, Bisà M, Esposito M, Meacci L, Mozzo R, DeSimone P, Urbani L, Filipponi F. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:47–54.PubMedCrossRef Biancofiore G, Critchley LA, Lee A, Bindi L, Bisà M, Esposito M, Meacci L, Mozzo R, DeSimone P, Urbani L, Filipponi F. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102:47–54.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Junttila EK, Koskenkari JK, Ohtonen PP, Ala-Kokko TI. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output monitoring is biased by low peripheral resistance in patients with intracranial haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:581–6.PubMedCrossRef Junttila EK, Koskenkari JK, Ohtonen PP, Ala-Kokko TI. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for cardiac output monitoring is biased by low peripheral resistance in patients with intracranial haemorrhage. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:581–6.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Vallet A, Cochard JF, Revel P, Sztark F. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1480–6.PubMedCrossRef Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, Vallet A, Cochard JF, Revel P, Sztark F. Cardiac output measurement in patients undergoing liver transplantation: pulmonary artery catheter versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1480–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Eleftheriadis S, Galatoudis Z, Didilis V, Bougioukas I, Schön J, Heinze H, Berger KU, Heringlake M. Variations in arterial blood pressure are associated with parallel changes in FlowTrac/Vigileo®-derived cardiac output measurements: a prospective comparison study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R179.PubMedCrossRef Eleftheriadis S, Galatoudis Z, Didilis V, Bougioukas I, Schön J, Heinze H, Berger KU, Heringlake M. Variations in arterial blood pressure are associated with parallel changes in FlowTrac/Vigileo®-derived cardiac output measurements: a prospective comparison study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R179.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:337–42.PubMedCrossRef Sakka SG, Kozieras J, Thuemer O, van Hout N. Measurement of cardiac output: a comparison between transpulmonary thermodilution and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:337–42.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:451–6.PubMedCrossRef Compton FD, Zukunft B, Hoffmann C, Zidek W, Schaefer JH. Performance of a minimally invasive uncalibrated cardiac output monitoring system (Flotrac/Vigileo) in haemodynamically unstable patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:451–6.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:636–43.PubMedCrossRef Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21:636–43.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:615–22.PubMedCrossRef Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac output induced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:615–22.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS, Laning K, Chen G, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:751–7.PubMed Meng L, Tran NP, Alexander BS, Laning K, Chen G, Kain ZN, Cannesson M. The impact of phenylephrine, ephedrine, and increased preload on third-generation Vigileo-FloTrac and esophageal doppler cardiac output measurements. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:751–7.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY, Yu HP, Yang MW, Lee WC, Lin CC. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:424–8.PubMedCrossRef Su BC, Tsai YF, Chen CY, Yu HP, Yang MW, Lee WC, Lin CC. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing liver transplantation: validity of a third-generation device. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:424–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The impact of systemic vascular resistance on the accuracy of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system in the perioperative period of cardiac surgery: a prospective observational comparison study
Authors
Yohei Sotomi
Katsuomi Iwakura
Yoshiharu Higuchi
Kazuo Abe
Junko Yoshida
Takafumi Masai
Kenshi Fujii
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-013-9481-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2013 Go to the issue