Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006

Repeatability of Nerve conduction Measurements using Automation

Authors: Xuan Kong, PhD, Eugene A. Lesser, DO, J. Thomas Megerian, MD, PhD, Shai N. Gozani, MD, PhD

Published in: Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

Objective

To quantify nerve conduction study (NCS) reproducibility utilizing an automated NCS system (NC-stat®, NeuroMetrix, Inc.).

Method

Healthy volunteers without neuropathic symptoms participated in the study. Their median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerves were tested twice (7 days apart) by the same technician with an NC-stat® instrument. Pre-fabricated electrode arrays specific to each nerve were used. Both motor responses (compound motor action potential [CMAP] and F-waves –all nerves) and sensory responses (sensory nerve action potentials [SNAP] –median and ulnar nerves only) were recorded following supramaximal stimuli. Automated algorithms determined all NCS parameters: distal motor latency (DML), mean F-wave latency (FWL), distal sensory latency (DSL), CMAP amplitude, and SNAP amplitude. Latency was adjusted for skin temperature deviation from reference. Pearson correlation coefficient (CC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variance (CoV), and relative intertrial variation (RIV) were calculated.

Results

Fifteen subjects participated in either upper or lower extremity studies with nine participating in both. With the exception of CMAP amplitude, all parameters had CoV less than 0.06. Upper extremity amplitude parameters had CCs greater than 0.85. CCs for latencies were greater than 0.80 except for the median nerve FWL (CC = 0.69). For lower extremity nerves, ICCs were highest for mean FWL (>0.90), followed by DML (>0.82) and then CMAP (peroneal 0.33, tibial 0.73). The 10th to 90th RIV percentiles were bounded by ±7% for F-wave latencies; ±9% for all DSLs; and ±11% for DML (except peroneal at 15%).

Conclusions

The reproducibility of NCS parameters obtained with an automated NCS instrument compared favorably with traditional electromyography laboratories. F-wave latencies had the highest repeatability, followed by DML, DSL, SNAP and CMAP amplitude. Given their high reproducibility, automated NCS instrument may encourage wider utilization of NCS in clinical and research applications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kimura J. (1977) Facts fallacies, and fancies of nerve conduction studies: Twenty-first annual Edward H. Lambert Lecture Muscle Nerve 20: 777–787CrossRef Kimura J. (1977) Facts fallacies, and fancies of nerve conduction studies: Twenty-first annual Edward H. Lambert Lecture Muscle Nerve 20: 777–787CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kohara N, Kimura J, Kaji R, Goto U, Ishii J, Takiguchi M, Nakai M. (2000) F-wave latency serves as the most reproducible measure in nerve conduction studies of diabetic polyneuropathy: Multicenter analysis in healthy subjects and patients with diabetic polyneuropathy Diabetologia 43: 915–921CrossRefPubMed Kohara N, Kimura J, Kaji R, Goto U, Ishii J, Takiguchi M, Nakai M. (2000) F-wave latency serves as the most reproducible measure in nerve conduction studies of diabetic polyneuropathy: Multicenter analysis in healthy subjects and patients with diabetic polyneuropathy Diabetologia 43: 915–921CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dyck PJ, Harper C, O’Brien P, Klein C, Litchy W, Dyck PJB. (2005) Monotonicity of nerve tests in diabetes Diabetes Care 20: 2192–2200CrossRef Dyck PJ, Harper C, O’Brien P, Klein C, Litchy W, Dyck PJB. (2005) Monotonicity of nerve tests in diabetes Diabetes Care 20: 2192–2200CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bril V, Ellison R, Ngo M, Bergstrom B, Raynard D, Gin H. (1998) Electrophysiological monitoring in clinical trials Muscle Nerve 21: 1368–1373CrossRefPubMed Bril V, Ellison R, Ngo M, Bergstrom B, Raynard D, Gin H. (1998) Electrophysiological monitoring in clinical trials Muscle Nerve 21: 1368–1373CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Salerno DF, Werner RA, Albers JW, Becker MP, Armstrong TJ, Franzblau A. (1999) Reliability of nerve conduction studies among active workers Muscle Nerve 22: 1372–1379CrossRefPubMed Salerno DF, Werner RA, Albers JW, Becker MP, Armstrong TJ, Franzblau A. (1999) Reliability of nerve conduction studies among active workers Muscle Nerve 22: 1372–1379CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Van Dijk JG, van der Kamp W, van Hilten BJ, van Someren P. (1994) Influence of recording site on CMAP amplitude and on its variation over a length of nerve Muscle Nerve 17: 1286–1292CrossRefPubMed Van Dijk JG, van der Kamp W, van Hilten BJ, van Someren P. (1994) Influence of recording site on CMAP amplitude and on its variation over a length of nerve Muscle Nerve 17: 1286–1292CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gozani SN, Fisher MA, Kong X, Megerian JT, Rutkove SB. (2005) Electrodiagnostic automation: Principles and practice Phys Med Rehabil Clin NA 16: 1015–1032 Gozani SN, Fisher MA, Kong X, Megerian JT, Rutkove SB. (2005) Electrodiagnostic automation: Principles and practice Phys Med Rehabil Clin NA 16: 1015–1032
8.
go back to reference Leffler CT, Gozani SN, Cros D. (2000) Median neuropathy at the wrist: Diagnostic utility of clinical findings and an automated electrodiagnostic device J Occup Environ Med 42: 398–409CrossRefPubMed Leffler CT, Gozani SN, Cros D. (2000) Median neuropathy at the wrist: Diagnostic utility of clinical findings and an automated electrodiagnostic device J Occup Environ Med 42: 398–409CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fisher MA. (2005) Comparison of automated and manual F-wave latency measurements. Clin Neurophys 116: 264–269CrossRef Fisher MA. (2005) Comparison of automated and manual F-wave latency measurements. Clin Neurophys 116: 264–269CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kong X, Gozani SN, Hayes MT, Weinberg DH. (2006) NC-stat sensory nerve conduction studies in the median and ulnar nerves of symptomatic patients Clin Neurophysiol 117: 405–413CrossRefPubMed Kong X, Gozani SN, Hayes MT, Weinberg DH. (2006) NC-stat sensory nerve conduction studies in the median and ulnar nerves of symptomatic patients Clin Neurophysiol 117: 405–413CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Gill NW 3rd, Ruediger TM, Gochis RD, Werling WC, Moore JH, Allison SC, Shaffer S, Underwood FB. (1999) Test-retest reliability of the ulnar F-wave minimum latency in normal adults Electromyogr Clin Neurophyiol 39: 195–200 Gill NW 3rd, Ruediger TM, Gochis RD, Werling WC, Moore JH, Allison SC, Shaffer S, Underwood FB. (1999) Test-retest reliability of the ulnar F-wave minimum latency in normal adults Electromyogr Clin Neurophyiol 39: 195–200
12.
go back to reference Tjon-A-Tsien AM, Lemkes HH, van der Kamp-Huyts AJ, van Dijk JG. (1996) Large electrodes improve nerve conduction repeatability in controls as well as in patients with diabetic neuropathy Muscle Nerve 19: 689–695CrossRefPubMed Tjon-A-Tsien AM, Lemkes HH, van der Kamp-Huyts AJ, van Dijk JG. (1996) Large electrodes improve nerve conduction repeatability in controls as well as in patients with diabetic neuropathy Muscle Nerve 19: 689–695CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practice. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 2001; 109-11 Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: principles and practice. 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 2001; 109-11
Metadata
Title
Repeatability of Nerve conduction Measurements using Automation
Authors
Xuan Kong, PhD
Eugene A. Lesser, DO
J. Thomas Megerian, MD, PhD
Shai N. Gozani, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 1387-1307
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2614
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-006-9046-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 6/2006 Go to the issue

Specialty Section on Surgical Neuromonitoring

Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery