Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-04-2015

The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Samuel G. Smith, Rosalind Raine, Austin Obichere, Michael S. Wolf, Jane Wardle, Christian von Wagner

Published in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 2/2015

Abstract

Guided by Fuzzy Trace Theory, this study examined the impact of a ‘Gist-based’ leaflet on colorectal cancer screening knowledge and intentions; and tested the interaction with participants’ numerical ability. Adults aged 45–59 years from four UK general practices were randomly assigned to receive standard information (‘The Facts’, n = 2,216) versus standard information plus ‘The Gist’ leaflet (Gist + Facts, n = 2,236). Questionnaires were returned by 964/4,452 individuals (22 %). 82 % of respondents reported having read the information, but those with poor numeracy were less likely (74 vs. 88 %, p < .001). The ‘Gist + Facts’ group were more likely to reach the criterion for adequate knowledge (95 vs. 91 %; p < .01), but this was not moderated by numeracy. Most respondents (98 %) intended to participate in screening, with no group differences and no interaction with numeracy. The improved levels of knowledge and self-reported reading suggest ‘The Gist’ leaflet may increase engagement with colorectal cancer screening, but ceiling effects reduced the likelihood that screening intentions would be affected.

Available only for authorised users

Atkin, W., Edwards, R., Kralj-Hans, I., Wooldrage, K., Hart, A. R., Northover, J. M., et al. (2010). Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 375, 1624–1633.CrossRef

Austoker, J., Giordano, L., Hewitson, P., & Villain, P. (2012). European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition—Communication. Endoscopy, 44, S164–S185.

Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S. L., Donahue, K. E., Halpern, D. J., & Crotty, K. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155, 97–107.CrossRefPubMed

Boxell, E. M., Smith, S. G., Morris, M., Kummer, S., Rowlands, G., Waller, J., et al. (2012). Increasing awareness of gynecological cancer symptoms and reducing barriers to medical help seeking: Does health literacy play a role? Journal of Health Communication, 17, S265–S279.CrossRef

Cairns, C. P., & Viswanath, K. (2006). Communication and colorectal cancer screening among the uninsured: Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (United States). Cancer Causes and Control, 17, 1115–1125.CrossRefPubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010a). Vital signs: Breast cancer screening among women aged 50–74 Years—United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 59, 813–816.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010b). Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50–75 Years—United States, 2008. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/wk/mm59e0706.pdf. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Cervical cancer screening among women Aged 18–30 years—United States, 2000–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 61, 1038–1042.

Christy, S. M., Perkins, S. M., Tong, Y., Krier, C., Champion, V. L., Skinner, C. S., et al. (2013). Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 44, 325–329.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Cooke, R., & French, D. P. (2008). How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. Psychology and Health, 23, 745–765.CrossRefPubMed

Davis, T. C., Arnold, C., Rademaker, A., Bennett, C., Bailey, S., Platt, D., et al. (2013). Improving colon cancer screening in community clinics. Cancer, 119, 3879–3886.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Elwyn, G., Stiel, M., Durand, M. A., & Boivin, J. (2011). The design of patient decision support interventions: Addressing the theory–practice gap. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 565–574.CrossRefPubMed

Ferreira, M. R., Dolan, N. C., Fitzgibbon, M. L., Davis, T. C., Gorby, N., Ladewski, L., et al. (2005). Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23, 1548–1554.CrossRefPubMed

Fukukura, J., Ferguson, M. J., & Fujita, K. (2013). Psychological distance can improve decision making under information overload via gist memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 658–665.CrossRef

General Medical Council. (2008). Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. Retrieved from http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Consent_-_English_0911.pdf. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

General Register Office for Scotland. (2012). Vital events reference tables. Retrieved from http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/statistics/theme/vital-events/general/ref-tables/2012/section-6-deaths-causes.html. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

Halloran, S., Launoy, G., & Zappa, M. (2012). European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis.—First Edition Faecal occult blood testing. Endoscopy, 44, S65–S87.CrossRef

Health and Social Care Information Centre. (2013). Cervical screening programme, England (2012–2013). Retrieved from http://www.hscic.gov.uk/searchcatalogue?productid=12601&topics=1%2fPublic+health%2fHealth+protection&kwd=D&sort=Relevance&size=10&page=1#top. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

Hewitson, P., Glasziou, P., Irwig, L., Towler, B., & Watson, E. (2007). Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), CD001216.

International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2014). World cancer report 2014. Lyon, France.

Klabunde, C. N., Cronin, K. A., Breen, N., Waldron, W. R., Ambs, A. H., & Nadel, M. R. (2011). Trends in colorectal cancer test use among vulnerable populations in the United States. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 20, 1611–1621.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.CrossRefPubMed

McCaffery, K. J., Holmes-Rovner, M., Smith, S. K., Rovner, D., Nutbeam, D., Clayman, M. L., et al. (2013). Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13, S10.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

McCloud, R. F., Jung, M., Gray, S. W., & Viswanath, K. (2013). Class, race and ethnicity and information avoidance among cancer survivors. British Journal of Cancer, 108, 1949–1956.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Miller, D. P, Jr, Spangler, J. G., Case, L. D., Goff, D. C, Jr, Singh, S., & Pignone, M. P. (2011). Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: A randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40, 608–615.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gotzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., et al. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 340, c869–c869.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Moss, S. M., Campbell, C., Melia, J., Coleman, D., Smith, S., Parker, R., et al. (2011). Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot. Gut, 61, 101–107.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Mullen, P. D., Allen, J. D., Karen Glanz, M. P. H., Fernandez, M. E., Bowen, D. J., Pruitt, S. L., et al. (2006). Measures used in studies of informed decision making about cancer screening: A systematic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 188–201.CrossRefPubMed

Murphy, C. C., McQueen, A., Bartholomew, L. K., Junco, D. J. D., Coan, S. P., & Vernon, S. W. (2013). Factorial validity and invariance of four psychosocial constructs of colorectal cancer screening: Does screening experience matter? Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention.

Myers, R. E., Vernon, S. W., Tilley, B. C., Lu, M., & Watts, B. G. (1998). Intention to screen for colorectal cancer among white male employees. Preventive Medicine, 27, 279–287.CrossRefPubMed

Nelson, W. L., Moser, R. P., & Han, P. K. J. (2013). Exploring objective and subjective numeracy at a population level: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Journal of Health Communication, 18, 192–205.CrossRefPubMed

Northern Ireland Statistics Research Agency. (2012). Registrar general annual report—2011. Belfast. Retrieved from http://www.nisra.gov.uk/archive/demography/publications/annual_reports/2011/RG2011.pdf. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

Office for National Statistics. (2013). Mortality statistics: Deaths registered in England and Wales, 2012. London. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/mortality-statistics–deaths-registered-in-england-and-wales–series-dr-/2012/index.html. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

Olamijulo, J. A., & Duncan, I. D. (1997). Patient-based evaluation of a colposcopy information leaflet. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 17, 394–398.CrossRefPubMed

Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H., & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review, 64, 169–190.CrossRefPubMed

Peters, E., Klein, W., Kaufman, A., Meilleur, L., & Dixon, A. (2013). More is not always better: Intuitions about effecting public policy can lead to unintended consequences. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7, 114–148.CrossRefPubMed

Power, E., Miles, A., von Wagner, C., Robb, K. A., & Wardle, J. (2009). Uptake of colorectal cancer screening: System, provider and individual factors and strategies to improve participation. Future Oncology, 5, 1371–1388.CrossRefPubMed

Ramirez, A. J., & Forbes, L. (2012). Approach to developing information about NHS cancer screening programmes. King’s Health Partners. Retrieved from http://www.informedchoiceaboutcancerscreening.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Approach-to-informed-choice-about-cancer-screening.pdf. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

Reyna, V. F. (2008). A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy Trace Theory. Medical Decision Making, 28, 850–865.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Reyna, V. F. (2011). Across the lifespan. In B. Fischhoff, N. T. Brewer, & J. S. Downs (Eds.), Communicating risks and benefits: An evidence-based user’s guide (pp. 111–120). Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administratation, US Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/ucm268078.htm. Accessed online June 11^th, 2014.

Reyna, V. F. (2012). Risk perception and communication in vaccination decisions: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory approach. Vaccine, 30, 3790–3797.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1991). Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4, 249–262.CrossRef

Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-Trace Theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1–75.CrossRef

Reyna, V. F., & Lloyd, F. J. (2006). Physician decision making and cardiac risk: Effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 179–195.PubMed

Reyna, V. F., & Mills, B. A. (2014). Theoretically motivated interventions for reducing sexual risk taking in adolescence: A randomized controlled experiment applying fuzzy-trace theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1627–1648.CrossRef

Robb, K. A., Campbell, J., Evans, P., Miles, A., & Wardle, J. (2008). Impact of risk information on perceived colorectal cancer risk: A randomized trial. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 744–753.CrossRefPubMed

Robb, K. A., Power, E., Kralj-Hans, I., Edwards, R., Vance, M., Atkin, W., et al. (2010). Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: Uptake in a population-based pilot programme. Journal of Medical Screening, 17, 75–78.CrossRefPubMed

Shapiro, J. A., Klabunde, C. N., Thompson, T. D., Nadel, M. R., Seeff, L. C., & White, A. (2012). Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT Colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 21, 895–904.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, S. K., Barratt, A., Trevena, L., Simpson, J. M., Jansen, J., & McCaffery, K. J. (2012a). A theoretical framework for measuring knowledge in screening decision aid trials. Patient Education and Counseling, 89, 330–336.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, S. G., Curtis, L. M., Wardle, J., von Wagner, C., & Wolf, M. S. (2013a). Skill set or mind set? Associations between health literacy, patient activation and health. PLoS ONE, 8, e74373.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Smith, S. G., Vart, G., Wolf, M. S., Obichere, A., Baker, H. J., Raine, R., … von Wagner, C. (2013b). How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: observations from a think-aloud study. Health Expectations.

Smith, S. G., von Wagner, C., McGregor, L. M., Curtis, L. M., Wilson, E. A. H., Serper, M., et al. (2012b). The influence of health literacy on comprehension of a colonoscopy preparation information leaflet. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 55, 1074–1080.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Smith, S. G., Wolf, M. S., Obichere, A., Raine, R., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2013c). The development and testing of a brief (“gist-based”) supplementary colorectal cancer screening information leaflet. Patient Education and Counseling, 93, 619–625.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Steele, R. J. C., Kostourou, I., McClements, P., Watling, C., Libby, G., Weller, D., et al. (2010). Effect of gender, age and deprivation on key performance indicators in a FOBT-based colorectal screening programme. Journal of Medical Screening, 17, 68–74.CrossRefPubMed

Szczepura, A., Price, C., & Gumber, A. (2008). Breast and bowel cancer screening uptake patterns over 15 years for UK south Asian ethnic minority populations, corrected for differences in socio-demographic characteristics. BMC Public Health, 8, 346.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Fagerlin, A. (2010a). Presenting research risks and benefits to parents. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 111, 718–723.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Tait, A. R., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Fagerlin, A., & Voepel-Lewis, T. (2010b). Effect of various risk/benefit trade-offs on parents’ understanding of a pediatric research study. Pediatrics, 125, e1475.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

The American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2011). Standard definitions. Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Retrieved from http://www.aapor.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Standard_Definitions2&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3156. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

The NHS Information Centre, Screening and Immunisations team. (2013). Breast screening programme, England (2011–2012). Retrieved from https://catalogue.ic.nhs.uk/publications/screening/breast/bres-scre-prog-eng-2011-12/bres-scre-prog-eng-2011-12-rep.pdf. Accessed online June 11th, 2014.

Tiro, J. A., Vernon, S. W., Hyslop, T., & Myers, R. E. (2005). Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 14, 2855–2861.CrossRefPubMed

Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. (2013). United States cancer statistics: 1999–2009 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/uscs.

Vernon, S. W., Myers, R. E., Tilley, B. C., & Li, S. (2001). Factors associated with perceived risk in automotive employees at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 10, 35–43.PubMed

Viswanath, K. (2005). The communications revolution and cancer control. Nature Reviews Cancer, 5, 828–835.CrossRefPubMed

von Wagner, C., Baio, G., Raine, R., Snowball, J., Morris, S., Atkin, W., et al. (2011). Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: Results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. International Journal of Epidemiology, 40, 712–718.CrossRef

von Wagner, C., Good, A., Wright, D., Rachet, B., Obichere, A., Bloom, S., et al. (2009a). Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England. British Journal of Cancer, 101, S60–S63.CrossRef

von Wagner, C., Semmler, C., Good, A., & Wardle, J. (2009b). Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processing. Patient Education and Counseling, 75, 352–357.CrossRef

von Wagner, C., Semmler, C., Power, E., & Good, A. (2010). What matters when deciding whether to participate in colorectal cancer screening? The moderating role of time perspective. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 15, 20–30.CrossRef

Waller, J., Macedo, A., von Wagner, C., Simon, A. E., Jones, C., Hammersley, V., et al. (2012). Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: Public preferences for an expert recommendation. British Journal of Cancer, 107, 1938–1943.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Wardle, J., Williamson, S., McCaffery, K., Sutton, S., Taylor, T., Edwards, R., et al. (2003). Increasing attendance at colorectal cancer screening: Testing the efficacy of a mailed, psychoeducational intervention in a community sample of older adults. Health Psychology, 22, 99–105.CrossRefPubMed

Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Liles, E., Beil, T. L., & Fu, R. (2008). Screening for colorectal cancer: A targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149, 638–658.CrossRefPubMed

Wilson, E. A. H., Wolf, M. S., Curtis, L. M., Clayman, M. L., Cameron, K. A., Eigen, K. V., et al. (2010). Literacy, cognitive ability, and the retention of health-related information about colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 116–125.CrossRefPubMed

Wolf, M. S., Curtis, L. M., Wilson, E. A. H., Revelle, W., Waite, K. R., Smith, S. G., et al. (2012). Literacy, cognitive function, and health: Results of the LitCog study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27, 1300–1307.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Wolfe, C. R., Reyna, V. F., Widmer, C. L., Cedillos, E. M., Fisher, C. R., Brust-Renck, P. G., & Weil, A. M. (2014). Efficacy of a web-based intelligent tutoring system for communicating genetic risk of breast cancer: A Fuzzy-Trace Theory approach. Medical Decision Making.

Woodrow, C., Watson, E., Rozmovits, L., Parker, R., & Austoker, J. (2008). Public perceptions of communicating information about bowel cancer screening. Health Expectations, 11, 16–25.CrossRefPubMed

Title: The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial
Authors: Samuel G. Smith
Rosalind Raine
Austin Obichere
Michael S. Wolf
Jane Wardle
Christian von Wagner
Publication date: 01-04-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Rumination mediates the relationships between depressed mood and both sleep quality and self-reported health in young adults

The association between mindfulness and emotional distress in adults with diabetes: Could mindfulness serve as a buffer? Results from Diabetes MILES: The Netherlands

Volitional processes and daily smoking: examining inter- and intraindividual associations around a quit attempt

How risky is it to use e-cigarettes? Smokers’ beliefs about their health risks from using novel and traditional tobacco products

Stress, depression and medication nonadherence in diabetes: test of the exacerbating and buffering effects of family support

A meta-analysis of the relationship between social constraints and distress in cancer patients