Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2019

01-12-2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Does assisted hatching affect live birth in fresh, first cycle in vitro fertilization in good and poor prognosis patients?

Authors: Jessica E. McLaughlin, Byeong Y. Choi, Qianqian Liu, Jonathan A. Gelfond, Randal D. Robinson, T. Arthur Chang, Jennifer F. Knudtson

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 12/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effect of assisted hatching (AH) on live birth rate (LBR) in first cycle, fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) in good and poor prognosis patients.

Methods

Retrospective cohort using cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Live birth rate was compared in women who underwent first cycle, autologous, fresh IVF cycles with (n = 48,858) and without (n = 103,413) AH from 2007 to 2015.

Results

The propensity-weighted LBR was 39.2% with AH versus 43.9% without AH in all patients. The rate difference (RD) with AH was − 4.7% ([CI − 0.053, − 0.040], P < 0.001) with the calculated number needed to harm being 22. AH affected live birth in both good prognosis and poor prognosis patients. The propensity-weighted monozygotic twinning (MZT) rate was 2.3% in patients treated with AH as compared to 1.2% patients that did not receive AH. The RD with AH on MZT in fresh, first IVF cycles was 1.1% ([0.008, 0.014], P < 0.001).

Conclusion

AH may affect LBR across all patients and in poor prognosis patients in fresh IVF cycles. Caution should be exercised when applying this technology. More prospective research is needed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hammadeh ME, Fischer-Hammadeh C, Ali KR. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction: a state of the art. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(2):119–28.CrossRef Hammadeh ME, Fischer-Hammadeh C, Ali KR. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction: a state of the art. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(2):119–28.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, M. and T. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive. Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(2):348–51.CrossRef Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, M. and T. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive. Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(2):348–51.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carney SK, Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MM, Nelson L. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD001894 Carney SK, Das S, Blake D, Farquhar C, Seif MM, Nelson L. Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;12:CD001894
4.
go back to reference Harper J, et al. Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for ‘add-on’ interventions? Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):485–91.CrossRef Harper J, et al. Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for ‘add-on’ interventions? Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):485–91.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kissin DM, et al. Assisted hatching: trends and pregnancy outcomes, United States, 2000-2010. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):795–801.CrossRef Kissin DM, et al. Assisted hatching: trends and pregnancy outcomes, United States, 2000-2010. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):795–801.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mansour RT, et al. Transfer of zona-free embryos improves outcome in poor prognosis patients: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(5):1061–4.CrossRef Mansour RT, et al. Transfer of zona-free embryos improves outcome in poor prognosis patients: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(5):1061–4.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Knudtson JF, et al. Assisted hatching and live births in first-cycle frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(4):628–34.CrossRef Knudtson JF, et al. Assisted hatching and live births in first-cycle frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(4):628–34.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, A.S.f.R.M., Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2012 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, A.S.f.R.M., Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. 2012 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
9.
go back to reference Stern JE, et al. Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):717–22 e2.CrossRef Stern JE, et al. Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART). Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):717–22 e2.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Imai KARM. Covariate balancing propensity score. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2014;76.CrossRef Imai KARM. Covariate balancing propensity score. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2014;76.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Alteri A, et al. Revisiting embryo assisted hatching approaches: a systematic review of the current protocols. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(3):367–91.CrossRef Alteri A, et al. Revisiting embryo assisted hatching approaches: a systematic review of the current protocols. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(3):367–91.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Luke B, et al. Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1338–44.CrossRef Luke B, et al. Using the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System morphological measures to predict live birth after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(5):1338–44.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Stern JE, et al. Is cryopreservation of embryos a legitimate surrogate marker of embryo quality in studies of assisted reproductive technology conducted using national databases? Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):890–3.CrossRef Stern JE, et al. Is cryopreservation of embryos a legitimate surrogate marker of embryo quality in studies of assisted reproductive technology conducted using national databases? Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):890–3.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference al-Nuaim LA, Jenkins JM. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction. BJOG. 2002;109(8):856–62.CrossRef al-Nuaim LA, Jenkins JM. Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction. BJOG. 2002;109(8):856–62.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schieve LA, et al. Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2000;74(2):288–94.CrossRef Schieve LA, et al. Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2000;74(2):288–94.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kanter JR, et al. Trends and correlates of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):111–7.CrossRef Kanter JR, et al. Trends and correlates of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):111–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jain T, et al. 30 years of data: impact of the United States in vitro fertilization data registry on advancing fertility care. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(3):477–88.CrossRef Jain T, et al. 30 years of data: impact of the United States in vitro fertilization data registry on advancing fertility care. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(3):477–88.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Luke B, et al. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):683–9.CrossRef Luke B, et al. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):683–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Vega M, et al. Not all twins are monozygotic after elective single embryo transfer: analysis of 32,600 elective single embryo transfer cycles as reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(1):118–22.CrossRef Vega M, et al. Not all twins are monozygotic after elective single embryo transfer: analysis of 32,600 elective single embryo transfer cycles as reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(1):118–22.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does assisted hatching affect live birth in fresh, first cycle in vitro fertilization in good and poor prognosis patients?
Authors
Jessica E. McLaughlin
Byeong Y. Choi
Qianqian Liu
Jonathan A. Gelfond
Randal D. Robinson
T. Arthur Chang
Jennifer F. Knudtson
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 12/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01619-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2019 Go to the issue