Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 7/2016

01-07-2016 | Genetics

Clinical application of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations

Authors: Wenke Zhang, Ying Liu, Li Wang, Hui Wang, Minyue Ma, Mengnan Xu, Xiaofei Xu, ZhiYing Gao, Jinliang Duan, David S. Cram, Yuanqing Yao

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to apply next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to identify chromosomally normal embryos for transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) cycles for translocations.

Methods

A total of 21 translocation couples with a history of infertility and repeated miscarriage presented at our PGD clinic for 24-chromosome embryo testing using copy number variation sequencing (CNV-Seq).

Results

Testing of 98 embryo samples identified 68 aneuploid (69.4 %) and 30 (30.6 %) euploid embryos. Among the aneuploid embryos, the most common abnormalities were segmental translocation imbalances, followed by whole autosomal trisomies and monosomies, segmental imbalances of non-translocation chromosomes, and mosaicism. In all unbalanced embryos resulting from reciprocal translocations, CNV-Seq precisely identified both segmental imbalances, extending from the predicted breakpoints to the chromosome termini. From the 21 PGD cycles, eight patients had all abnormal embryos and 13 patients had at least one normal/balanced and euploid embryo available for transfer. In nine intrauterine transfer cycles, seven healthy babies have been born. In four of the seven children tested at 18 weeks gestation, the karyotypes matched with the original PGD results.

Conclusion

In clinical PGD translocation cycles, CNV-Seq displayed the hallmarks of a comprehensive diagnostic technology for high-resolution 24-chromosome testing of embryos, capable of identifying true euploid embryos for transfer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ogilvie CM, Braude P, Scriven PN. Successful pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for carriers of chromosome translocations. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2001;4:168–71.CrossRef Ogilvie CM, Braude P, Scriven PN. Successful pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for carriers of chromosome translocations. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2001;4:168–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie CM. Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1437–49.CrossRefPubMed Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie CM. Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1437–49.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Munné S. Analysis of chromosome segregation during preimplantation genetic diagnosis in both male and female translocation heterozygotes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111:305–9.CrossRefPubMed Munné S. Analysis of chromosome segregation during preimplantation genetic diagnosis in both male and female translocation heterozygotes. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111:305–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Suzumori N, Sugiura-Ogasawara M. Genetic factors as a cause of miscarriage. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:3431–7.CrossRefPubMed Suzumori N, Sugiura-Ogasawara M. Genetic factors as a cause of miscarriage. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17:3431–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Fung J, Gianaroli L, Cohen J. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1209–18.CrossRefPubMed Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Fung J, Gianaroli L, Cohen J. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1209–18.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hardy K, Handyside AH. Biopsy of cleavage stage human embryos and diagnosis of single gene defects by DNA amplification. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:388–92.PubMed Hardy K, Handyside AH. Biopsy of cleavage stage human embryos and diagnosis of single gene defects by DNA amplification. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1992;116:388–92.PubMed
7.
go back to reference De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:767–80.CrossRefPubMed De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:767–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kokkali G, Vrettou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Jones GM, Cram DS, Stavrou D, et al. Birth of a healthy infant following trophectoderm biopsy from blastocysts for PGD of beta-thalassaemia major. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1855–9.CrossRefPubMed Kokkali G, Vrettou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Jones GM, Cram DS, Stavrou D, et al. Birth of a healthy infant following trophectoderm biopsy from blastocysts for PGD of beta-thalassaemia major. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1855–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1628–36.CrossRefPubMed McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1628–36.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fischer J, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:283–9.CrossRefPubMed Fischer J, Colls P, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) improves pregnancy outcome for translocation carriers with a history of recurrent losses. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:283–9.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1925–35.CrossRefPubMed Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1925–35.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K, Su J, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1606–12.e1-2.CrossRefPubMed Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K, Su J, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1606–12.e1-2.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tan Y, Yin X, Zhang S, Jiang H, Tan K, Li J, et al. Clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening using next generation sequencing. Gigascience. 2014;3:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tan Y, Yin X, Zhang S, Jiang H, Tan K, Li J, et al. Clinical outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening using next generation sequencing. Gigascience. 2014;3:30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Curr Genomics. 2012;13:463–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Curr Genomics. 2012;13:463–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577–83.CrossRefPubMed Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Voet T, Vanneste E, Van der Aa N, Melotte C, Jackmaert S, Vandendael T, et al. Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles leading to inv dup del occur in human cleavage stage embryos. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:783–93.CrossRefPubMed Voet T, Vanneste E, Van der Aa N, Melotte C, Jackmaert S, Vandendael T, et al. Breakage-fusion-bridge cycles leading to inv dup del occur in human cleavage stage embryos. Hum Mutat. 2011;32:783–93.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yin X, Tan K, Vajta G, Jiang H, Tan Y, Zhang C, et al. Massively parallel sequencing for chromosomal abnormality testing in trophectoderm cells of human blastocysts. Biol Reprod. 2013;88:69.CrossRefPubMed Yin X, Tan K, Vajta G, Jiang H, Tan Y, Zhang C, et al. Massively parallel sequencing for chromosomal abnormality testing in trophectoderm cells of human blastocysts. Biol Reprod. 2013;88:69.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Huang J, Yan L, Fan W, Zhao N, Zhang Y, Tang F, et al. Validation of multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of cleavage-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1685–91.CrossRefPubMed Huang J, Yan L, Fan W, Zhao N, Zhang Y, Tang F, et al. Validation of multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of cleavage-stage embryos. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1685–91.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wang L, Cram DS, Shen J, Wang X, Zhang J, Song Z, et al. Validation of copy number variation sequencing for detecting chromosome imbalances in human preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 2014;91:37.CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Cram DS, Shen J, Wang X, Zhang J, Song Z, et al. Validation of copy number variation sequencing for detecting chromosome imbalances in human preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 2014;91:37.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bono S, Biricik A, Spizzichino L, Nuccitelli A, Minasi MG, Greco E, et al. Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing-based protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of reciprocal translocations. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:938–44.CrossRefPubMed Bono S, Biricik A, Spizzichino L, Nuccitelli A, Minasi MG, Greco E, et al. Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing-based protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of reciprocal translocations. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:938–44.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fan J, Wang L, Wang H, Ma M, Wang S, Liu Z, et al. The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing for identifying chromosome disease syndromes in human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:62–70.CrossRefPubMed Fan J, Wang L, Wang H, Ma M, Wang S, Liu Z, et al. The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing for identifying chromosome disease syndromes in human embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31:62–70.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wang H, Wang L, Ma M, Song Z, Zhang J, Xu G, et al. A PGD pregnancy achieved by embryo copy number variation sequencing with confirmation by non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. J Genet Genomics. 2014;41:453–6.CrossRefPubMed Wang H, Wang L, Ma M, Song Z, Zhang J, Xu G, et al. A PGD pregnancy achieved by embryo copy number variation sequencing with confirmation by non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. J Genet Genomics. 2014;41:453–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ruttanajit T, Chanchamroen S, Cram DS, Sawakwongpra K, Suksalak W, Leng X, et al. Detection and quantitation of chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts using copy number variation sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2015;36:154–62.CrossRef Ruttanajit T, Chanchamroen S, Cram DS, Sawakwongpra K, Suksalak W, Leng X, et al. Detection and quantitation of chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts using copy number variation sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2015;36:154–62.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Liang D, Peng Y, Lv W, Deng L, Zhang Y, Li H, et al. Copy number variation sequencing for comprehensive diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:519–26.CrossRefPubMed Liang D, Peng Y, Lv W, Deng L, Zhang Y, Li H, et al. Copy number variation sequencing for comprehensive diagnosis of chromosome disease syndromes. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:519–26.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wang Y, Chen Y, Tian F, Zhang J, Song Z, Wu Y, et al. Maternal mosaicism is a significant contributor to discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing. Clin Chem. 2014;60:251–9.CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Chen Y, Tian F, Zhang J, Song Z, Wu Y, et al. Maternal mosaicism is a significant contributor to discordant sex chromosomal aneuploidies associated with noninvasive prenatal testing. Clin Chem. 2014;60:251–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Liang D, Lv W, Wang H, Xu L, Liu J, Li H, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing of fetal whole chromosome aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:409–15.CrossRefPubMed Liang D, Lv W, Wang H, Xu L, Liu J, Li H, et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing of fetal whole chromosome aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:409–15.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tibshirani R, Wang P. Spatial smoothing and hot spot detection for CGH data using fused lasso. Biostatistics. 2008;9:18–29.CrossRefPubMed Tibshirani R, Wang P. Spatial smoothing and hot spot detection for CGH data using fused lasso. Biostatistics. 2008;9:18–29.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Handyside AH. 24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:595–602.CrossRefPubMed Handyside AH. 24-chromosome copy number analysis: a comparison of available technologies. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:595–602.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Li N, Wang L, Wang H, Ma M, Wang X, Li Y, et al. The performance of whole genome amplification methods and next-generation sequencing for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. J Genet Genomics. 2015;42:151–9.CrossRefPubMed Li N, Wang L, Wang H, Ma M, Wang X, Li Y, et al. The performance of whole genome amplification methods and next-generation sequencing for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities. J Genet Genomics. 2015;42:151–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Cotroneo E, Cottone G, et al. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1375–82.CrossRefPubMed Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Cotroneo E, Cottone G, et al. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:1375–82.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Wells D, Kaur K, Grifo J, Glassner M, Taylor JC, Fragouli E, et al. Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. J Med Genet. 2014;51:553–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wells D, Kaur K, Grifo J, Glassner M, Taylor JC, Fragouli E, et al. Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation. J Med Genet. 2014;51:553–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Clinical application of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations
Authors
Wenke Zhang
Ying Liu
Li Wang
Hui Wang
Minyue Ma
Mengnan Xu
Xiaofei Xu
ZhiYing Gao
Jinliang Duan
David S. Cram
Yuanqing Yao
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0724-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 7/2016 Go to the issue