Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2015

01-12-2015 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Elective single-embryo transfer improves cumulative pregnancy outcome in young patients but not in women of advanced reproductive age

Authors: Akihisa Fujimoto, Kaoru Morishima, Miyuki Harada, Tetsuya Hirata, Yutaka Osuga, Tomoyuki Fujii

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 12/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the present study is to assess the significance of elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) in older women.

Methods

The outcomes of assisted reproductive technology between 2001 and 2013 at single institution were retrospectively evaluated. Cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) in one oocyte retrieval cycle were compared between those who underwent eSET and multiple embryo transfer (MET) in fresh cycles.

Results

The outcomes of 429 eSET cycles and 965 MET cycles were compared. CLBRs in eSET were higher than those of MET in women under 37 and were comparable in women aged 37 and over. The analysis of the outcomes separately in three age subgroups showed a significantly higher CLBR in young eSET (aged under 37) than that in young MET and similar CLBR between older (aged 37–40 and over 40) eSET and MET. Multiple birth rates were lower in eSET in all age groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that, in women aged under 37, number of frozen embryos, presence of good-quality embryos, and eSET were significantly related to cumulative live birth. In women aged between 37 and 40, age and number of frozen embryos were significantly related, while eSET was not.

Conclusions

eSET in women under 37 resulted in increased CLBR compared with MET. In women aged between 37 and 40, CLBR in eSET group was similar with that in MET group. In both age groups, eSET reduced multiple birth rates. The significance of eSET in older women is limited presently, and further research on the strategy to improve cumulative outcomes is necessary.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2581–7.CrossRefPubMed Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2581–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Strandell A, Bergh C, Lundin K. Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2520–5.CrossRefPubMed Strandell A, Bergh C, Lundin K. Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2520–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Fauque P, Jouannet P, Davy C, Guibert J, Viallon V, Epelboin S, et al. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:927–35.CrossRefPubMed Fauque P, Jouannet P, Davy C, Guibert J, Viallon V, Epelboin S, et al. Cumulative results including obstetrical and neonatal outcome of fresh and frozen-thawed cycles in elective single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:927–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;341:c6945.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed McLernon DJ, Harrild K, Bergh C, Davies MJ, de Neubourg D, Dumoulin JC, et al. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;341:c6945.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Veleva Z, Vilska S, Hyden-Granskog C, Tiitinen A, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36–39 years. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2098–102.CrossRefPubMed Veleva Z, Vilska S, Hyden-Granskog C, Tiitinen A, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36–39 years. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2098–102.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Niinimaki M, Suikkari AM, Makinen S, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Martikainen H. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40–44 years. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:331–5.CrossRefPubMed Niinimaki M, Suikkari AM, Makinen S, Soderstrom-Anttila V, Martikainen H. Elective single-embryo transfer in women aged 40–44 years. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:331–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, Gysler M, Hemmings R, Cheung AP, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77.PubMed Min JK, Hughes E, Young D, Gysler M, Hemmings R, Cheung AP, et al. Elective single embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010;32:363–77.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:917–22.CrossRefPubMed Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL. Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:917–22.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Veeck LL. An atlas of human gamates and conceptuses: an illustrated reference for assisted reproductive technology. New York: London, Parthenon; 1999.CrossRef Veeck LL. An atlas of human gamates and conceptuses: an illustrated reference for assisted reproductive technology. New York: London, Parthenon; 1999.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:515–22.CrossRefPubMed Bourgain C, Devroey P. The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:515–22.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1190–3.CrossRefPubMed Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1190–3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Metadata
Title
Elective single-embryo transfer improves cumulative pregnancy outcome in young patients but not in women of advanced reproductive age
Authors
Akihisa Fujimoto
Kaoru Morishima
Miyuki Harada
Tetsuya Hirata
Yutaka Osuga
Tomoyuki Fujii
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 12/2015
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0598-8

Other articles of this Issue 12/2015

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 12/2015 Go to the issue