Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 6/2015

01-06-2015 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Aneuploidy rates and blastocyst formation after biopsy of morulae and early blastocysts on day 5

Authors: Jonathan D. Kort, Ruth B. Lathi, Kathleen Brookfield, Valerie L. Baker, Qianying Zhao, Barry R. Behr

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 6/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Studies have demonstrated high implantation rates after trophectoderm biopsy of day 5 expanded blastocysts. However, biopsy of cleavage stage embryos may adversely affect embryo development and implantation. No studies have assessed the utility of day 5 morulae and early blastocyst biopsy. This study sought to better understand these slower embryos’ aneuploidy rates and implantation potential.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of all autologous IVF cycles utilizing PGS at a single academic infertility center.

Results

The biopsy of day 5 morulae and early blastocysts provided 22 % additional euploid blastocysts available for fresh day 6 transfer compared to day 5 biopsy of only expanded blastocysts. Aneuploidy did correlate with embryo stage on day 5, even after controlling for maternal age, with 16 % of morulae and 35 % of blastocysts being euploid. The majority (83 %) of euploid morulae progressed to the blastocyst stage by day 6. Experience transferring slower developing embryos is limited, but preliminary pregnancy and implantation rates appear similar to euploid embryos biopsied as expanded blastocysts.

Conclusions

The biopsy of all non-arrested embryos on day 5 provides genetic information for all blastocysts on day 6, increasing the pool of euploid blastocysts available for fresh transfer and avoiding the need to cryopreserve developmentally competent embryos without genetic information.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. MHR: Basic Sci Reprod Med. 2010;16:590–600. Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. SNP microarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavage-stage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. MHR: Basic Sci Reprod Med. 2010;16:590–600.
2.
go back to reference Fritz MA. Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now? Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2617–21.PubMedCrossRef Fritz MA. Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now? Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2617–21.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:697–703.PubMedCrossRef Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:697–703.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:624–30.PubMedCrossRef Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:624–30.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:156–62.PubMedCrossRef Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:156–62.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gustin SF, Zhao Q, Behr B, Lathi RB. Leveling the playing field – embryo transfers after trophectoderm biopsy have similar outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S194–5.CrossRef Gustin SF, Zhao Q, Behr B, Lathi RB. Leveling the playing field – embryo transfers after trophectoderm biopsy have similar outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:S194–5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliot T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1173–81.PubMedCrossRef Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliot T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1173–81.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kroener L, Ambartsumyan G, Briton-Jones C, Dumesic D, Surrey M, Munné S, et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:876–80.PubMedCrossRef Kroener L, Ambartsumyan G, Briton-Jones C, Dumesic D, Surrey M, Munné S, et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:876–80.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:1126–30.PubMedCrossRef Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:1126–30.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:697–9.PubMedCrossRef Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, Milki A. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:697–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kort JD, Lathi RB, Zhao Q, Behr B, Baker VL. Are Anti-müllerian hormone levels predictive of aneuploidy rates? Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2 Supplement):e5–6.CrossRef Kort JD, Lathi RB, Zhao Q, Behr B, Baker VL. Are Anti-müllerian hormone levels predictive of aneuploidy rates? Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2 Supplement):e5–6.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman CFL. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;26:477–85.PubMedCrossRef Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman CFL. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013;26:477–85.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Stoppa M, Romano S, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, et al. No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(1):57–66.PubMedCrossRef Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Stoppa M, Romano S, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, et al. No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poor-prognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;30(1):57–66.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gonzalez-Merino E, Emiliani S, Vassart G, Den Bergh MV, Vannin AS, Abramowicz M, et al. Incidence of chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos at different developmental stages analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genet Test. 2003;7:85–95.PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez-Merino E, Emiliani S, Vassart G, Den Bergh MV, Vannin AS, Abramowicz M, et al. Incidence of chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos at different developmental stages analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genet Test. 2003;7:85–95.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lorthongpanich T, Doris TPY, Limviphuvadh V, Knowles BB, Solter D. Developmental fate and lineage commitment of singled mouse blastomeres. Development. 2012;139:3722–31.PubMedCrossRef Lorthongpanich T, Doris TPY, Limviphuvadh V, Knowles BB, Solter D. Developmental fate and lineage commitment of singled mouse blastomeres. Development. 2012;139:3722–31.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tao J, Craig RH, Johnson M, Williams B, Lewis W, White J, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos at the morula stage and outcomes after transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:108–18.PubMedCrossRef Tao J, Craig RH, Johnson M, Williams B, Lewis W, White J, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos at the morula stage and outcomes after transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:108–18.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Treff N, Tao X, Ferry K, Jing S, Taylor D, Scott RT. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction–based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):819–24.PubMedCrossRef Treff N, Tao X, Ferry K, Jing S, Taylor D, Scott RT. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction–based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(4):819–24.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Aneuploidy rates and blastocyst formation after biopsy of morulae and early blastocysts on day 5
Authors
Jonathan D. Kort
Ruth B. Lathi
Kathleen Brookfield
Valerie L. Baker
Qianying Zhao
Barry R. Behr
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 6/2015
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0475-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2015

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 6/2015 Go to the issue