Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Ophthalmology 1/2017

01-02-2017 | Original Paper

Comparison of intraocular pressure variability in glaucoma measured by multiple clinicians with those by one clinician

Authors: Motofumi Kawai, Naoko Kawai, Seigo Nakabayashi, Reiko Kinouchi, Akitoshi Yoshida

Published in: International Ophthalmology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) variability measured by multiple clinicians with those by one clinician. Forty-seven of 227 consecutive patients with glaucoma who had been examined routinely for over 12 months without changes in antiglaucoma medications at Asahikawa Medical University were included. Patients were assigned to one of two groups based on whether they had been followed by multiple or one clinician. One eye of each patient was evaluated. The IOPs obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry were evaluated. We used the IOP standard deviation (SD, mmHg) and coefficient of variation (CV, %) as parameters of IOP variability. The main outcome measures were the differences in SD and CV between the groups. Multiple linear regression analysis evaluated factors associated with the SD and CV. Twenty-four (51.1 %) patients were assigned to the multiple-clinicians group and 23 (48.9 %) to the single-clinician group. The mean ± SD and CV were higher in the former (1.9 ± 0.5 and 12.0 ± 3.7, respectively) than in the latter group (1.4 ± 0.3 and 10.1 ± 2.5; P = 0.0005 and 0.044, respectively). The number of treating clinicians was the factor most associated with the SD and CV (β = 0.455, P = 0.002 and β = 0.387, P = 0.008, respectively). The variability in the IOP measurements of patients who had been monitored by multiple clinicians was higher than in patients followed by one clinician. The factor most associated with IOP variability was the number of clinicians involved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7 (2000) The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 130:429–440CrossRef The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7 (2000) The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 130:429–440CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Hussein M (2002) Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1268–1279CrossRefPubMed Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Hussein M (2002) Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120:1268–1279CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK II, Wilson MR, Gordon MO (2002) The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:701–713 (discussion 829–830) CrossRefPubMed Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, Keltner JL, Miller JP, Parrish RK II, Wilson MR, Gordon MO (2002) The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 120:701–713 (discussion 829–830) CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference O’Brien C, Schwartz B, Takamoto T, Wu DC (1991) Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 111:491–500CrossRefPubMed O’Brien C, Schwartz B, Takamoto T, Wu DC (1991) Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 111:491–500CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bergea B, Bodin L, Svedbergh B (1999) Impact of intraocular pressure regulation on visual fields in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 106:997–1005CrossRefPubMed Bergea B, Bodin L, Svedbergh B (1999) Impact of intraocular pressure regulation on visual fields in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 106:997–1005CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Sharpe ED, Day DG, Holmes KT, Leech JN, Johnson M, Cantrell JB (2000) Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 130:274–279CrossRefPubMed Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Sharpe ED, Day DG, Holmes KT, Leech JN, Johnson M, Cantrell JB (2000) Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 130:274–279CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, Liu G, Li G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J, Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (2004) Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology 111:1627–1635CrossRefPubMed Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL, Liu G, Li G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J, Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (2004) Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology 111:1627–1635CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Caprioli J, Coleman AL (2008) Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 115:1123–1129CrossRefPubMed Caprioli J, Coleman AL (2008) Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 115:1123–1129CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hong S, Seong GJ, Hong YJ (2007) Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation and progressive visual field deterioration in patients with glaucoma and low intraocular pressures after a triple procedure. Arch Ophthalmol 125:1010–1013CrossRefPubMed Hong S, Seong GJ, Hong YJ (2007) Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation and progressive visual field deterioration in patients with glaucoma and low intraocular pressures after a triple procedure. Arch Ophthalmol 125:1010–1013CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rao HL, Addepalli UK, Jonnadula GB, Kumbar T, Senthil S, Garudadri CS (2013) Relationship between intraocular pressure and rate of visual field progression in treated glaucoma. J Glaucoma 22:719–724CrossRefPubMed Rao HL, Addepalli UK, Jonnadula GB, Kumbar T, Senthil S, Garudadri CS (2013) Relationship between intraocular pressure and rate of visual field progression in treated glaucoma. J Glaucoma 22:719–724CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Salim S, Du H, Wan J (2013) Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 22:325–329CrossRefPubMed Salim S, Du H, Wan J (2013) Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 22:325–329CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hong J, Xu J, Wei A, Deng SX, Cui X, Yu X, Sun X (2013) A new tonometer—the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:659–665CrossRef Hong J, Xu J, Wei A, Deng SX, Cui X, Yu X, Sun X (2013) A new tonometer—the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:659–665CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wang AS, Alencar LM, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Deokule S, Vizzeri G, Medeiros FA (2013) Repeatability and reproducibility of Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry. J Glaucoma 22:127–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang AS, Alencar LM, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Deokule S, Vizzeri G, Medeiros FA (2013) Repeatability and reproducibility of Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry. J Glaucoma 22:127–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Gordon MO, Kass MA, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study G (2013) Seasonal changes in visual field sensitivity and intraocular pressure in the ocular hypertension treatment study. Ophthalmology 120:724–730CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gardiner SK, Demirel S, Gordon MO, Kass MA, Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study G (2013) Seasonal changes in visual field sensitivity and intraocular pressure in the ocular hypertension treatment study. Ophthalmology 120:724–730CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30CrossRefPubMed Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Liu J, Roberts CJ (2005) Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:146–155CrossRefPubMed Liu J, Roberts CJ (2005) Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:146–155CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF (2006) Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5337–5347CrossRef Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu H, Garway-Heath DF (2006) Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47:5337–5347CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53:34–43CrossRef Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53:34–43CrossRef
21.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of intraocular pressure variability in glaucoma measured by multiple clinicians with those by one clinician
Authors
Motofumi Kawai
Naoko Kawai
Seigo Nakabayashi
Reiko Kinouchi
Akitoshi Yoshida
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Ophthalmology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0217-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

International Ophthalmology 1/2017 Go to the issue