Top

Published in:

01-03-2006 | Original Paper

Consumer Choice in Dutch Health Insurance after Reform

Authors: Hans Maarse, Ruud Ter Meulen

Published in: Health Care Analysis | Issue 1/2006

Abstract

This article investigates the scope and effects of enhanced consumer choice in health insurance that is presented as a cornerstone of the new health insurance legislation in the Netherlands that will come into effect in 2006. The choice for choice marks the current libertarian trend in Dutch health care policymaking. One of our conclusions is that the scope of enhanced choice should not be overstated due to many legal and non-legal restrictions to it. The consumer choice advocates have great expectations of the impact of enhanced choice. A critical analysis of its impact demonstrates that these expectations may not become true and that enhanced consumer choice should not be perceived as the ‘magic bullet’ for many problems in health care.

In addition all insured must pay an income-related premium: 6% for employed persons and 4.4% for self-employed persons. The maximum income over which an income-related premium must be paid is €30,000. The income-related premium is set by the government.

The only legal limit to private insurer autonomy followed from the Health Insurance Access Act (Wet Toegang op de Ziektekostenverzekering) which obligated private insurers to offer a standard policy the benefit catalogue and rate of which were set by the government. This health insurance scheme was introduced in 1984 as a kind of safety net for those who were not entitled for the Statutory Health Insurance Scheme but had access problems in private health insurance due to their (expected) poor health status.

CPB (Centraal Planbureau) (2005) Switch on the Competition: Causes, Consequences and Policy Implications of Consumer Switching Costs. The Hague

Daniels N (2000) Accountability for Reasonableness in Private and Public Health Insurance. In: A. Coulter and C. Ham (eds.), The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing. Buckingham/ Philadelphia: Open University Press: 89–106

De Heij L (2004) Zorgverzekeringswet kan tot minder zorgverbetering leiden. ESB, 9-7-2004:320-321

Evans R (1998) Going for the Gold: the Redistributive Agenda behind Market-Based Health Care Reform. In: M.Peterson, Healthy Markets? The New Competition in Medical Care. Durham/London: Duke University Press:66–102

Hirschman A (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge (Mass): Harvard University Press

Hirsch F (1977) Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge

IOO (Instituut voor Onderzoek van Overheidsuitgaven) (2000) Concurrentie tussen particuliere ziektekostenverzekeraars. Den Haag

Kerssens J, Groenewegen P (2005) Consumer preferences in social health insurance. European Journal of Health Economics 50:8–15CrossRef

Laske-Aldershof T, Schut F (2002) Switching Behavior of Consumers in Dutch Social Health Insurance, paper presented at the 4^th European conference on health economics, Paris

10.

Laske-Aldershof T, Schut F (2005) Monitor verzekerdenmobiliteit. Rotterdam: iBMG

11.

Maarse J, Paulus A (2003) Has Solidarity Survived? A Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Social Health Insurance Reform in Four European Countries. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 28(4), 585–614PubMedCrossRef

12.

Maarse J, Okma K (2004) The Privatisation Paradox in Dutch Health Care. In: J. Maarse (ed), Privatisation in European Health Care. Maarssen: Elsevier: 97–116

13.

Maarse H, Paulus A A, Kuiper G (2005) Supervision in Social Health Insurance: a Four-Country Study. Health Policy 71(3), 333–346PubMedCrossRef

14.

Motta M (2004) Competition Policy. Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

15.

Porter M, Olmsted Teisberg E (2004) Redefining Competition in Health Care. Harvard Business Review, on line version, June (www.hbsp.org)

16.

Rice T (2001) Should Consumer Choice be Encouraged in Health Care? In: J. Davis (ed.) The Social Economics of Health Care. London: Routledge

17.

Schwartz B (2004) The Paradox of Choice – Why More is Less. Harper Collins Publishers

18.

Ter Meulen R (1995) Limiting Solidarity in the Netherlands: a Two-Tier System on the Way. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20, 607–616

19.

Van de Ven W, Ellis R (2000) Risk Adjustment in Competitive Health Policy Markets. In: A. Culyer, J. Newhouse (eds.) Handbook of Health Economics, volume 1A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, chapter 14

20.

Van de Ven W, Prinsze F, de Bruijn D, Schut F (2005) Nieuw zorgstelsel vereist betere risicoverevening. Economisch Statistische Berichten 20-5-2005: 223-225

21.

Van Dijk M, Pomp M, Laske-Aldershof T, Schut E, Boer W, de Boo A, Smit M (2005) Consumer Price Sensitivity in Social Health Insurance. The Hague: discussion paper

22.

Vektis (2005) Verzekeringsmonitor (www.vektis.nl). Accessed July 14, 2005

Title: Consumer Choice in Dutch Health Insurance after Reform
Authors: Hans Maarse
Ruud Ter Meulen
Publication date: 01-03-2006
Publisher: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
Published in: Health Care Analysis / Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 1065-3058
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3394
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-006-0010-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Consumer Choice in Dutch Health Insurance after Reform

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Is Health Inequality Across Individuals of Moral Concern?

Working Up Policy: The Use of Specific Disease Exemplars in Formulating General Principles Governing Childhood Genetic Testing

The Québec Complaint Examination System: Stakeholder Perspectives on the Purpose and Intake of Complaints

Leib ohne Seele (Body Without Soul)

Health Promotion and the Freedom of the Individual