Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 4/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

Cancer genetic testing panels for inherited cancer susceptibility: the clinical experience of a large adult genetics practice

Authors: Christina G. Selkirk, Kristen J. Vogel, Anna C. Newlin, Scott M. Weissman, Shelly M. Weiss, Chi-Hsiung Wang, Peter J. Hulick

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing genetic testing panels for cancer susceptibility (cancer panels) have recently become clinically available. At present, clinical utility is unknown and there are no set criteria or guidelines established for whom to offer such testing. Although it may be a cost-effective method to test multiple cancer susceptibility genes concurrently, the rate of finding variants of unknown significance (VUS) may be high and testing may yield mutations in genes with no established management recommendations. We describe our Center’s experience over a 14-month period (April 2012–June 2013) for patient interest and uptake in cancer panel testing and whether there were predictors of pursuing testing or identifying mutations. Using a clinical ranking system, patients’ family histories were ranked from 0 to 3 (low likelihood to high likelihood for underlying genetic susceptibility). The clinical ranking system was assessed to determine its predictability of finding mutations. Of the 689 patients who met inclusion criteria, the option of pursuing a cancer panel was discussed with 357 patients; 63 (17.6 %) patients pursued testing. Those who pursued testing were more likely to be older, male, affected with cancer, affected with multiple primary cancers, and had a higher clinical rank than non-pursuers. There were no significant predictors of finding a mutation on panel testing. Of the 61 patients who have received results, there was a 6.6 % mutation rate and 19.7 % VUS rate. The yield of cancer panels in clinical practice is low and the strength of family history alone may not predict likelihood of finding a mutation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Domchek SM, Bradbury A, Garber JE, Offit K, Robson ME (2013) Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net? J Clin Oncol 31:1267–1270PubMedCrossRef Domchek SM, Bradbury A, Garber JE, Offit K, Robson ME (2013) Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net? J Clin Oncol 31:1267–1270PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Katsanis SH, Katsanis N (2013) Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics. Nat Rev Genet 14:415–426PubMedCrossRef Katsanis SH, Katsanis N (2013) Molecular genetic testing and the future of clinical genomics. Nat Rev Genet 14:415–426PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Need AC, Shashi V, Hitomi Y, Schoch K, Shianna KV, McDonald MT, Meisler MH, Goldstein DB (2012) Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. J Med Genet 49:353–361PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Need AC, Shashi V, Hitomi Y, Schoch K, Shianna KV, McDonald MT, Meisler MH, Goldstein DB (2012) Clinical application of exome sequencing in undiagnosed genetic conditions. J Med Genet 49:353–361PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Guttmacher AE, McGuire AL, Ponder B, Stefansson K (2010) Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine. Nat Rev Genet 11:161–165PubMedCrossRef Guttmacher AE, McGuire AL, Ponder B, Stefansson K (2010) Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine. Nat Rev Genet 11:161–165PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Walsh T, Lee MK, Casadei S, Thornton AM, Stray SM, Pennil C, Nord AS, Mandell JB, Swisher EM, King MC (2010) Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12629–12633PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Walsh T, Lee MK, Casadei S, Thornton AM, Stray SM, Pennil C, Nord AS, Mandell JB, Swisher EM, King MC (2010) Detection of inherited mutations for breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture and massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12629–12633PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Roberts NJ, Vogelstein JT, Parmigiani G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE (2012) The predictive capacity of personal genome sequencing. Sci Transl. Med 4:133ra58PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Roberts NJ, Vogelstein JT, Parmigiani G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Velculescu VE (2012) The predictive capacity of personal genome sequencing. Sci Transl. Med 4:133ra58PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gracia-Aznarez FJ, Fernandez V, Pita G, Peterlongo P, Dominguez O, de la HM, Duran M, Osorio A, Moreno L, Gonzalez-Neira A, Rosa-Rosa JM, Sinilnikova O, Mazoyer S, Hopper J, Lazaro C, Southey M, Odefrey F, Manoukian S, Catucci I, Caldes T, Lynch HT, Hilbers FS, van Asperen CJ, Vasen HF, Goldgar D, Radice P, Devilee P, Benitez J (2013) Whole exome sequencing suggests much of non-BRCA1/BRCA2 familial breast cancer is due to moderate and low penetrance susceptibility alleles. PLoS One 8:e55681 Gracia-Aznarez FJ, Fernandez V, Pita G, Peterlongo P, Dominguez O, de la HM, Duran M, Osorio A, Moreno L, Gonzalez-Neira A, Rosa-Rosa JM, Sinilnikova O, Mazoyer S, Hopper J, Lazaro C, Southey M, Odefrey F, Manoukian S, Catucci I, Caldes T, Lynch HT, Hilbers FS, van Asperen CJ, Vasen HF, Goldgar D, Radice P, Devilee P, Benitez J (2013) Whole exome sequencing suggests much of non-BRCA1/BRCA2 familial breast cancer is due to moderate and low penetrance susceptibility alleles. PLoS One 8:e55681
9.
go back to reference Bogdanova N, Dork T (2012) Molecular genetics of breast and ovarian cancer: recent advances and clinical implications. Balkan. J Med Genet 15:75–80PubMedCentralPubMed Bogdanova N, Dork T (2012) Molecular genetics of breast and ovarian cancer: recent advances and clinical implications. Balkan. J Med Genet 15:75–80PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nevanlinna H, Bartek J (2006) The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility. Oncogene 25:5912–5919PubMedCrossRef Nevanlinna H, Bartek J (2006) The CHEK2 gene and inherited breast cancer susceptibility. Oncogene 25:5912–5919PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Pharoah P, Bolla MK, Nevanlinna H, Van’t Veer LJ, Garcia-Closas M, Hopper JL, Hall P, Andrulis IL, Devilee P, Fasching PA, nton-Culver H, Lambrechts D, Hooning M, Cox A, Giles GG, Burwinkel B, Lindblom A, Couch FJ, Mannermaa A, Grenaker AG, John EM, Dork T, Flyger H, Dunning AM, Wang Q, Muranen TA, van HR, Figueroa J, Southey MC, Czene K, Knight JA, Tollenaar RA, Beckmann MW, Ziogas A, Christiaens MR, Collee JM, Reed MW, Severi G, Marme F, Margolin S, Olson JE, Kosma VM, Kristensen VN, Miron A, Bogdanova N, Shah M, Blomqvist C, Broeks A, Sherman M, Phillips KA, Li J, Liu J, Glendon G, Seynaeve C, Ekici AB, Leunen K, Kriege M, Cross SS, Baglietto L, Sohn C, Wang X, Kataja V, Borresen-Dale AL, Meyer A, Easton DF, Schmidt MK, Bojesen SE (2012) CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:4308–4316 Weischer M, Nordestgaard BG, Pharoah P, Bolla MK, Nevanlinna H, Van’t Veer LJ, Garcia-Closas M, Hopper JL, Hall P, Andrulis IL, Devilee P, Fasching PA, nton-Culver H, Lambrechts D, Hooning M, Cox A, Giles GG, Burwinkel B, Lindblom A, Couch FJ, Mannermaa A, Grenaker AG, John EM, Dork T, Flyger H, Dunning AM, Wang Q, Muranen TA, van HR, Figueroa J, Southey MC, Czene K, Knight JA, Tollenaar RA, Beckmann MW, Ziogas A, Christiaens MR, Collee JM, Reed MW, Severi G, Marme F, Margolin S, Olson JE, Kosma VM, Kristensen VN, Miron A, Bogdanova N, Shah M, Blomqvist C, Broeks A, Sherman M, Phillips KA, Li J, Liu J, Glendon G, Seynaeve C, Ekici AB, Leunen K, Kriege M, Cross SS, Baglietto L, Sohn C, Wang X, Kataja V, Borresen-Dale AL, Meyer A, Easton DF, Schmidt MK, Bojesen SE (2012) CHEK2*1100delC heterozygosity in women with breast cancer associated with early death, breast cancer-specific death, and increased risk of a second breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:4308–4316
12.
go back to reference Culver J, Brinkerhoff C, Clague J, Yang K, Singh K, Sand S, Weitzel J (2013) Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress. Clin Genet 84:464–472PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Culver J, Brinkerhoff C, Clague J, Yang K, Singh K, Sand S, Weitzel J (2013) Variants of uncertain significance in BRCA testing: evaluation of surgical decisions, risk perception, and cancer distress. Clin Genet 84:464–472PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Colorectal Cancer Screening (online). 2013. (cited 2013 November 8). National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013) National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Colorectal Cancer Screening (online). 2013. (cited 2013 November 8). National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2013)
14.
go back to reference Boursi B, Sella T, Liberman E, Shapira S, David M, Kazanov D, Arber N, Kraus S (2013) The APC p. I1307K polymorphism is a significant risk factor for CRC in average risk Ashkenazi Jews. Eur J Cancer 49:3680–3685PubMedCrossRef Boursi B, Sella T, Liberman E, Shapira S, David M, Kazanov D, Arber N, Kraus S (2013) The APC p. I1307K polymorphism is a significant risk factor for CRC in average risk Ashkenazi Jews. Eur J Cancer 49:3680–3685PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Locker GY, Kaul K, Weinberg DS, Gatalica Z, Gong G, Peterman A, Lynch J, Klatzco L, Olopade OI, Bomzer CA, Newlin A, Keenan E, Tajuddin M, Knezetic J, Coronel S, Lynch HT (2006) The I1307K APC polymorphism in Ashkenazi Jews with colorectal cancer: clinical and pathologic features. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 169:33–38PubMedCrossRef Locker GY, Kaul K, Weinberg DS, Gatalica Z, Gong G, Peterman A, Lynch J, Klatzco L, Olopade OI, Bomzer CA, Newlin A, Keenan E, Tajuddin M, Knezetic J, Coronel S, Lynch HT (2006) The I1307K APC polymorphism in Ashkenazi Jews with colorectal cancer: clinical and pathologic features. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 169:33–38PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Aretz S, Uhlhaas S, Goergens H, Siberg K, Vogel M, Pagenstecher C, Mangold E, Caspari R, Propping P, Friedl W (2006) MUTYH-associated polyposis: 70 of 71 patients with biallelic mutations present with an attenuated or atypical phenotype. Int J Cancer 119:807–814PubMedCrossRef Aretz S, Uhlhaas S, Goergens H, Siberg K, Vogel M, Pagenstecher C, Mangold E, Caspari R, Propping P, Friedl W (2006) MUTYH-associated polyposis: 70 of 71 patients with biallelic mutations present with an attenuated or atypical phenotype. Int J Cancer 119:807–814PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jenkins MA, Croitoru ME, Monga N, Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Hopper JL, Gallinger S (2006) Risk of colorectal cancer in monoallelic and biallelic carriers of MYH mutations: a population-based case-family study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:312–314PubMedCrossRef Jenkins MA, Croitoru ME, Monga N, Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Hopper JL, Gallinger S (2006) Risk of colorectal cancer in monoallelic and biallelic carriers of MYH mutations: a population-based case-family study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:312–314PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Win AK, Cleary SP, Dowty JG, Baron JA, Young JP, Buchanan DD, Southey MC, Burnett T, Parfrey PS, Green RC, Le ML, Newcomb PA, Haile RW, Lindor NM, Hopper JL, Gallinger S, Jenkins MA (2011) Cancer risks for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers with a family history of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 129:2256–2262PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Win AK, Cleary SP, Dowty JG, Baron JA, Young JP, Buchanan DD, Southey MC, Burnett T, Parfrey PS, Green RC, Le ML, Newcomb PA, Haile RW, Lindor NM, Hopper JL, Gallinger S, Jenkins MA (2011) Cancer risks for monoallelic MUTYH mutation carriers with a family history of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 129:2256–2262PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rennert G, Lejbkowicz F, Cohen I, Pinchev M, Rennert HS, Barnett-Griness O (2012) MutYH mutation carriers have increased breast cancer risk. Cancer 118:1989–1993PubMedCrossRef Rennert G, Lejbkowicz F, Cohen I, Pinchev M, Rennert HS, Barnett-Griness O (2012) MutYH mutation carriers have increased breast cancer risk. Cancer 118:1989–1993PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA (2011) Association between monoallelic MUTYH mutation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-regression analysis. Fam Cancer 10:1–9PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Win AK, Hopper JL, Jenkins MA (2011) Association between monoallelic MUTYH mutation and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-regression analysis. Fam Cancer 10:1–9PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Out AA, Wasielewski M, Huijts PE, van Minderhout IJ, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Tops CM, Nielsen M, Seynaeve C, Wijnen JT, Breuning MH, van Asperen CJ, Schutte M, Hes FJ, Devilee P (2012) MUTYH gene variants and breast cancer in a Dutch case-control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:219–227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Out AA, Wasielewski M, Huijts PE, van Minderhout IJ, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Tops CM, Nielsen M, Seynaeve C, Wijnen JT, Breuning MH, van Asperen CJ, Schutte M, Hes FJ, Devilee P (2012) MUTYH gene variants and breast cancer in a Dutch case-control study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:219–227PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Canto MI, Harinck F, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Poley JW, Kamel I, Nio Y, Schulick RS, Bassi C, Kluijt I, Levy MJ, Chak A, Fockens P, Goggins M, Bruno M (2013) International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut 62:339–347PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Canto MI, Harinck F, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Poley JW, Kamel I, Nio Y, Schulick RS, Bassi C, Kluijt I, Levy MJ, Chak A, Fockens P, Goggins M, Bruno M (2013) International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut 62:339–347PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Casadei S, Norquist BM, Walsh T, Stray S, Mandell JB, Lee MK, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, King MC (2011) Contribution of inherited mutations in the BRCA2-interacting protein PALB2 to familial breast cancer. Cancer Res 71:2222–2229PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Casadei S, Norquist BM, Walsh T, Stray S, Mandell JB, Lee MK, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, King MC (2011) Contribution of inherited mutations in the BRCA2-interacting protein PALB2 to familial breast cancer. Cancer Res 71:2222–2229PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fecteau H, Vogel KJ, Hanson K, Morrill-Cornelius S (2014) The evolution of cancer risk assessment in the era of next generation sequencing. J Genet Couns 23(4):633–639 Fecteau H, Vogel KJ, Hanson K, Morrill-Cornelius S (2014) The evolution of cancer risk assessment in the era of next generation sequencing. J Genet Couns 23(4):633–639
26.
go back to reference Eggington JM, Burbridge LA, Roa BB, Pruss D, Bowles K, Rosenthal E, Esterling L, Wenstrup RJ (2012) Current variant of uncertain significance rate in BRCA1/2 and Lynch Syndrome testing (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM). Presented American College of medical genetics and genomics annual meeting 2012 Eggington JM, Burbridge LA, Roa BB, Pruss D, Bowles K, Rosenthal E, Esterling L, Wenstrup RJ (2012) Current variant of uncertain significance rate in BRCA1/2 and Lynch Syndrome testing (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, EPCAM). Presented American College of medical genetics and genomics annual meeting 2012
27.
go back to reference American College of Surgeons: Commission on cancer. Cancer program standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care V1.2 American College of Surgeons: Commission on cancer. Cancer program standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care V1.2
28.
go back to reference (2003) American Society of clinical oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 21:2397–2406 (2003) American Society of clinical oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 21:2397–2406
29.
go back to reference Daly MB, Axilbund JE, Buys S, Crawford B, Farrell CD, Friedman S, Garber JE, Goorha S, Gruber SB, Hampel H, Kaklamani V, Kohlmann W, Kurian A, Litton J, Marcom PK, Nussbaum R, Offit K, Pal T, Pasche B, Pilarski R, Reiser G, Shannon KM, Smith JR, Swisher E, Weitzel JN (2010) Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:562–594PubMed Daly MB, Axilbund JE, Buys S, Crawford B, Farrell CD, Friedman S, Garber JE, Goorha S, Gruber SB, Hampel H, Kaklamani V, Kohlmann W, Kurian A, Litton J, Marcom PK, Nussbaum R, Offit K, Pal T, Pasche B, Pilarski R, Reiser G, Shannon KM, Smith JR, Swisher E, Weitzel JN (2010) Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8:562–594PubMed
Metadata
Title
Cancer genetic testing panels for inherited cancer susceptibility: the clinical experience of a large adult genetics practice
Authors
Christina G. Selkirk
Kristen J. Vogel
Anna C. Newlin
Scott M. Weissman
Shelly M. Weiss
Chi-Hsiung Wang
Peter J. Hulick
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-014-9741-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Familial Cancer 4/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine